Advertisement

Modeling Emergency Department Using a Hybrid Simulation Approach

  • Norazura Ahmad
  • Noraida Abdul Ghani
  • Anton Abdulbasah Kamil
  • Razman Mat Tahar
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 229)

Abstract

Within hospital, emergency department is one of the most important unit that involves complex patient movement flow and detailed operational activities. As an integrated system, the efficiency of emergency department depends on its interaction between inter-departmental units and intra-departmental elements. Over the years, with the rapid development of computer technology, there has been a rising trend of using simulation modeling to improve healthcare operations. Discrete-event simulation (DES) has become a popular and effective decision-making tool for modeling the stochastic operational activities in a system. However for a whole system approach, system dynamics (SD) has advantages over DES. SD does not require vast data and is able to capture the interdependency relations between different units in an integrated system. Both approaches have strengths and weaknesses that may support and complement each other. An integrated model of both approaches will provide a realistic view of a complex system. This chapter provides an overview of the hybrid simulation modeling applications to emergency department.

Keywords

Complex system Discrete-event simulation Emergency department Healthcare system Hybrid simulation System dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Kolb EMW, Lee T, Peck J (2007) Effect of coupling between emergency department and inpatient unit on the overcrowding in emergency department. In: Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, pp 1586–1593Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jun JB, Jacobson SH, Swisher JR (1999) Application of discrete event simulation in healthcare clinics: a survey. J Oper Res Soc 50:109–123MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brailsford SC (2007) Tutorial: advances and challenges in healthcare simulation modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, pp 1436–1448Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chahal K, Eldabi T (2008) Applicability of hybrid simulation to different modes of governance in UK healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, pp 1469–1477Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad N, Ghani NA, Anton AK, Mat Tahar R (2012) Emergency department problems: a call for hybrid simulation, lecture notes in engineering and computer science. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2012, WCE 2012, 4–6 July, 2012, London UK, pp 1470–1474Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zulkepli J (2012) A theoretical framework for hybrid simulation in modeling complex patient pathways. PhD thesis 2012, Brunel University, London, UK (unpublished), p 1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garg L, McClean S, Barton M (2008) Is management science doing enough to improve healthcare? Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol 30:76–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruohonen T, Neittaanmaki P, Teittinen J (2006) Simulation model for improving the operation of the emergency department of special healthcare. In: Proceeding of the 2006 winter simulation conference, pp 453–458Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed MA, AlKhamis TM (2009) Simulation optimization for an emergency department healthcare unit in Kuwait. Eur J Oper Res 198(3):936–942MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahapatra S, Koelling CP, Patvivatsiri L, Fraticelli B, Eitel D, Grove L (2003) Pairing emergency severity index5-level triage data with computer aided system design to improve emergency department access and throughput. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on winter, simulation, pp 1918–1925Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takakuwa S, Shiozaki H (2004) Functional analysis for operating emergency department of a general hospital. In: Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference, pp 2003–2011Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medeiros DJ, Swenson E, DeFlitch C (2008) Improving patient flow in a hospital emergency department. In: Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, pp 1526–1531Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Komashie A, Mousavi A (2005) Modeling emergency departments using discrete event simulation techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, pp 2681–2685Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cochran JK, Roche KT (2009) A multi-class queuing network analysis methodology for improving hospital emergency department performance. Comput Oper Res 36:1497–1512MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baesler FF, Jahnsen HE, DaCosta M (2003) The use of simulation and design of experiments for estimating maximum capacity in an emergency room. In: Proceedings of 2003 winter simulation conference, pp 1903–1906Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Royston G, Dost A, Townshend J, Turner H (1999) Using system dynamics to help develop and implement policies and programmes in healthcare in England. Syst Dyn Rev 15:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lane DC, Monefeldt C, Rosenhead JV (2000) Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: a system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department. J Oper Res Soc 51(5):518–531MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brailsford S, Lattimer VA, Tarnaras P, Turnbull JC (2004) Emergency and on-demand healthcare: modelling a large complex system. J Oper Res Soc 55(1):34–42MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brenner S, Zeng Z, Liu Y, Wang J, Li J, Howard PK (2010) Modeling and analysis of the emergency department at university of Kentucky Chandler hospital using simulations. J Emerg Nurs 36(4):303–310Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brailsford SC, Churilov L, Liew SK (2003) Treating ailing emergency departments with simulation: an integrated perspective. In: Anderson J (ed) Proceedings of western multiconference on health sciences simulation. Florida, Society for Modelling & Simulation International (SCS), San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brailsford SC, Desai SM, Viana J (2010) Towards the holy grail: combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 2010 winter, simulation, pp 2293–2303Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahacheck A (1992) An introduction to patient flow simulation for healthcare managers. J Soc Health Syst 3:73–81Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Isken MW, Ward TJ, McKee TC (1999) Simulating outpatient obstetrical clinics. In: Proceedings of the 1999 winter simulation conference, pp 1557–1563Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eldabi T, Young T (2007) Towards a framework for healthcare simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, pp 1454–1460Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eldabi T, Paul RJ, Young T (2007) Simulation modelling in healthcare: reviewing legacies and investigating futures. J Oper Res Soc 58(2):262–270MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zulkepli J, Eldabi T (2011) Technique for improving care integration models. In: Proceedings of the european, Mediterranean & middle eastern conference on information systems 2011, Athens, Greece, pp 46–58May 30–31, 2011Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chahal K, Eldabi T (2008) Which is more appropriate: a multi-perspective comparison between system dynamics and discrete event simulation. In: Proceedings of the (2008) European Mediterranean conference on information systems, Dubai, UAEGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuljis J, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK (2007) Can healthcare benefit from modeling and simulation methods in the same way as business and manufacturing has? In: Procedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, pp 1449–1453Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ford A (1999) Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics models of environmental systems. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martin RH, Raffo D (2000) A model of the software development process using both continuous and discrete models. Softw Process Improv Pract 5(2–3):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Setamanit S, Wakeland W, Raffo D (2007) Using simulation to evaluate global software development task allocation strategies. Softw Process Improv Pract 12(5):491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rabelo L, Helal M, Jones A, Min HS (2005) Enterprise simulation: a hybrid system approach. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 18(6):498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Helal M, Rabelo L, Sepúlveda J, Jones A (2007) A methodology for integrating and synchronizing the system dynamics and discrete event simulation paradigms. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference of the system dynamics society, vol 3, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reiner G (2005) Customer-oriented improvement and evaluation of supply chain processes supported by simulation models. Int J Prod Econ 96(3):381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Venkateswaran J, Son YJ, Jones AT, Min HSJ (2006) A hybrid simulation approach to planning in a VMI supply chain. Int J Simul Process Model 2(3–4):133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Giachetti RE, Centeno EA, Centeno MA, Sundram R (2005) Assessing the viability of an open access policy in an outpatient clinic: a discrete event and continuous simulation modelling approach. In: Proceeding of the 2005 winter simulation conference, pp 2246–2255Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chahal K, Eldabi T (2010) A generic framework for hybrid simulation in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the system dynamics conference 2010, (April 10, 2011). http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2010/proceed/papers

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norazura Ahmad
    • 1
  • Noraida Abdul Ghani
    • 2
  • Anton Abdulbasah Kamil
    • 2
  • Razman Mat Tahar
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Quantitative Sciences, College of Arts and SciencesUniversiti Utara, MalaysiaSintokMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Distance EducationUniversiti Sains Malaysia, USM GeorgetownMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Technology ManagementUniversiti Malaysia Pahang GambangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations