Determining the Importance of Design Features on Usable Educational Websites
This research investigated the relative importance of specific design criteria developed for the purpose of this research, in the evaluation of the usability of educational websites from the point view of students. The results showed that content and navigation were the first and second preferred design categories to be considered while evaluating the usability of educational websites, while the architecture/organisation was the leasts important category. Also, the results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between males and females regarding only one category: the content. Females considered this to be the most important category while males considered it as the second most important. By contrast, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the students of the two selected faculties (the Faculty of Information Technology and Science, and the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences) concerning the relative importance of the developed criteria based on their majors/specialisations.
KeywordsDesign criteria Educational Students’ preferences Usability User testing websites
This research was funded by the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies in Zarqa University /Jordan.
- 1.Murugappan A, Ferdin JJ, Shamika M, Manideep V, Mridul M (2009) Metric based architecture to enhance software usability. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists 2009, IMECS 2009, vol I, Hong Kong, pp 18–20Google Scholar
- 2.Nielsen J (2009) Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Useit.com. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2006
- 3.Anonymous, Step-by-Step Usability Guide, (2006). http://www.usability.gov Accessed 20 Sept 2011
- 5.Nielsen J (2000) Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lencastre J, Chaves J (2008) A usability evaluation of educational websites. In: Proceedings of the EADTU conferenceGoogle Scholar
- 7.Toit M, Bothma C (2010) Evaluating the usability of an academic marketing department’s website from a marketing student’s perspective. Int Retail and Mark Rev 5(1): 15–24Google Scholar
- 8.Mustafa S, Al-Zoua’bi L (2008) Usability of the academic websites of Jordan’s universities. In: Proceedings of the international Arab conference on information technology, TunisiaGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gonzalez M, Granollers T, Pascual A (2008) Testing website usability in Spanish-speaking academia through heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough. J Univ Comput Sci 14(9):1513–1527Google Scholar
- 10.Kostaras N, Xenos M (2006) Assessing educational web-site usability using heuristic evaluation rules. In: Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic conference in informaticsGoogle Scholar
- 11.Papadopoulos T, Xenox M (2008) Quality evaluation of educational websites using heuristic and laboratory methods. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Panhellenic scientific student conference on informatics, related technologies, and applications, pp 43–54Google Scholar
- 14.Zhang P, von Dran G, Blake P, Pipithsuksunt V (2000) A comparison of the most important website features in different domains: an empirical study of user perceptions. In: Proceedings of Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS’2000), Long Beach, CA, pp 1367–1372Google Scholar
- 15.Hasan L (2012) Investigating the relative importance of design criteria in the evaluation of the usability of educational websites from the viewpoint of students. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2012, WCE 2012, London, UK, 4–6 July 2012, pp 832–837Google Scholar