Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell as a Reducer of CO\(_2\) Emissions from Gas Turbine Power Plants

  • Jaroslaw Milewski
  • Rafal Bernat
  • Janusz Lewandowski
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 229)

Abstract

A Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) is shown to reduce CO\(_2\) emissions from a Gas Turbine Power Plant (GTPP). The MCFC is placed in the flue gas stream of the gas turbine. The main advantages of this solution are: higher total electricity generated by a hybrid system and reduced CO\(_2\) emissions with power generation efficiency remained the same. The model of the MCFC is given and described. The results obtained show that use of an MCFC could reduce CO\(_2\) emissions by 73.

Keywords

CO\(_2\) sequestration Emissions Engineering Fuel cells  Gas turbine Modeling Molten carbonate fuel cell  Optimization Power plants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The results presented in this paper were obtained from research work co-financed by the National Centre of Research and Development in the framework of Contract SP/E/1/67484/10 - Strategic Research Programme - Advanced technologies for energy generation: Development of a technology for highly efficiency zero-emission coal-fired power units integrated with CO2 capture. Special acknowledgments for Prof. Lee Choong Gon from Hanbat National University, South Korea for his help and support with the experimental part of the work done.

References

  1. 1.
    Blum L, Deja R, Peters R, Stolten D (2011) Comparison of efficiencies of low, mean and high temperature fuel cell systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(17):11056–11067Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Budzianowski W (2010) An oxy-fuel mass-recirculating process for H\(_2\) production with CO\(_2\) capture by autothermal catalytic oxyforming of methane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(14):7454–7469Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Lorenzo G, Fragiacomo P (2012) Electrical and electrical-thermal power plants with molten carbonate fuel cell/gas turbine-integrated systems. Int J Energy Res 36(2):153–165Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Lorenzo G, Fragiacomo P (2012) A methodology for improving the performance of molten carbonate fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid systems. Int J Energy Res 36(1):96–110Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Discepoli G, Cinti G, Desideri U, Penchini D, Proietti S (2012) Carbon capture with molten carbonate fuel cells: experimental tests and fuel cell performance assessment. Int J Greenh Gas Control 9:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Granser D, Rocca F (1996) New high-efficiency 70 mw heavy-duty gas turbine. In: Proceedings of Power-Gen conference, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeong H, Cho S, Kim D, Pyun H, Ha D, Han C, Kang M, Jeong M, Lee S (2012) A heuristic method of variable selection based on principal component analysis and factor analysis for monitoring in a 300 kw mcfc power plant. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(15):11394–11400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kotowicz J, Bartela T (2012) Optimisation of the connection of membrane CCS installation with a supercritical coal-fired power plant. Energy 38(1):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kupecki J, Badyda K (2011) SOFC-based micro-CHP system as an example of efficient power generation unit. Arch Thermodyn 32(3):33–43Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lanzini A, Santarelli M, Orsello G (2010) Residential solid oxide fuel cell generator fuelled by ethanol: cell, stack and system modelling with a preliminary experiment. Fuel Cells 10(4):654–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milewski J, Bernat R, Lewandowski J (2012) Reducing CO\(_{2}\) emissions from a gas turbine power plant by using a molten carbonate fuel cell. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2012, WCE 2012, London, UK, pp 1773–1778, 4–6 July 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milewski J, Wołowicz M, Badyda K, Misztal Z (2011) Operational characteristics of 36 kW PEMFC-CHP unit. Rynek Energii 92(1):150–156Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milewski J, Wołowicz M, Miller A (2012) An alternative model of molten carbonate fuel cell: a proposal. In: EmHyTeC 2012, number P.1-34, pp 130–132Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morita H, Komoda M, Mugikura Y, Izaki Y, Watanabe T, Masuda Y, Matsuyama T (2002) Performance analysis of molten carbonate fuel cell using a Li/Na electrolyte. J Power Sour 112(2):509–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mueller F, Gaynor R, Auld AE, Brouwer J, Jabbari F, Samuelsen GS (2008) Synergistic integration of a gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell for improved transient capability. J Power Sour 176(1):229–239Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nomura R, Iki N, Kurata O, Kawabata M, Tsutsumi A, Koda E, Furutani H (2011) System analysis of IGFC with exergy recuperation utilizing low-grade coal, vol 4, pp 243–251Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wee J-H (2011) Molten carbonate fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid systems as distributed energy resources. Appl Energy 88(12):4252–4263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu W, Luo J-J (2010) Nonlinear feedback control of a preheater-integrated molten carbonate fuel cell system. J Process Control 20(7):860–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang H, Lin G, Chen J (2011) Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of a new molten carbonate fuel cell system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(6):4015–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaroslaw Milewski
    • 1
  • Rafal Bernat
    • 1
  • Janusz Lewandowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Heat EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations