Abating Climate Change and Feeding the World Through Soil Carbon Sequestration

Chapter

Abstract

Two degrees Celsius was accepted by the Copenhagen Accord and the G-8 Summit as an acceptable upper limit of increase in global temperature. This requires identification and implementation of viable options to reduce emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases and sequester carbon from the atmosphere: business as usual will mean a drastic increase in atmospheric CO2 with dire consequences for the environment, ecosystem services and human well-being. However, net emissions can be reduced by enhancing terrestrial C pools: the soil (4,000 Pg to 3 m depth) and the biotic (620 Pg). The soil C pool is ~5 times the atmospheric pool (780 Pg) and 6.5 times the biotic pool. Most agroecosystems have severely depleted their soil organic carbon (SOC). The magnitude of depletion (30–40 MgC/ha, i.e. 25–75 % of the antecedent) depends on climate, soil type, land use history, farming systems and management.

In the long term, extractive farming practices can severely deplete SOC, exacerbate degradation and adversely affect agronomic productivity. Nonetheless, depleted and degraded soils have a large carbon sink capacity, and the SOC pool can be restored by restorative land use and adoption of management practices that create a positive soil carbon budget, reduce emissions from farming operations like tillage, and minimize risks of soil erosion and nutrient and SOC depletion. These practices include conservation agriculture with mulch farming and cover cropping, complex rotations including agroforestry, integrated nutrient management in conjunction with biological N fixation and recycling of plant nutrients fortified by rhizobial and mycorrhizal inoculations, biochar, fertigation with drip subirrigation, and creating disease-suppressive soils through improvement of rhizospheric processes. The SOC pool should be enhanced to above a threshold level of 1.5–2.0 % in the surface layer of most cultivated soils. Increase in SOC pool in the root zone by 1 Mg/ha can enhance total food production in developing countries by 30–50 million Mg/year. The rate of SOC sequestration in most cropland soils ranges from 100 to 1,000 kgC/ha/year with a total global sequestration potential of 0.4–1.2 PgC over 50–100 years. The potential of C sequestration in the terrestrial biosphere is estimated to be equivalent to a drawdown of 50 ppm of atmospheric CO2 over a century.

References

  1. Ainsworth E, McGrath JM (2010) Direct effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide and ozone of crop yields. Glob Change Res 37:109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrow CJ (2012) Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Appl Geogr 34:21–28. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2008) No-tillage and soil carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009a) Corn stover removal for expanded uses reduces soil fertility and structural stability. Sci Soc Am J 73(2):418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009b) Indiscriminate corn stover removal reduces soil fertility, soil organic carbon and crop yields. CSA News 54:8–9Google Scholar
  7. Bloom AJ, Burger M, Assensio R et al (2010) Carbon dioxide enrichment inhibits nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis. Science 328:899–902Google Scholar
  8. Bouman BAM, Tuong TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agric Water Manag 49:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouman BAM, Peng S, Castaneda AR, Visperas RM (2005) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag 74:87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouman BAM, Yang XG, Wang HQ et al (2006) Performance of aerobic rice varieties under irrigated conditions in North China. Field Crop Res 97:53–65Google Scholar
  11. Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:12052–12057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cai Z (2012) Greenhouse gas budget for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Earth Sci 55:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christopher S, Lal R (2007) Nitrogen limitation on carbon sequestration in North America cropland soils. Crit Rev Plant Sci 26:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clements R, Haggar J, Quezada A, Torres J (2011) Technologies for climate change adaptation – agriculture sector. UNEP Ris Centre, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinar A, Somé L, Hassan R et al (2008) Climate change and agriculture in Africa: impact assessment and adaptation strategies. Earthscan/James & James, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO and WFP (2010) The state of food insecurity in the world. Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO (2011) Hunger. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D et al (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238Google Scholar
  19. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342Google Scholar
  20. Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P et al (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–280Google Scholar
  21. Galdos MV, Cerri CC, Lal R et al (2010) Net greenhouse gas fluxes in Brazilian ethanol production systems. Glob Change Biol Bioenerg 2:37–44Google Scholar
  22. Glover JD, Reganold JP, Bell LW et al (2010) Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328:1638–1639Google Scholar
  23. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818Google Scholar
  24. Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E et al (2010) Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 365:2973–2989Google Scholar
  25. Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P et al (2008) Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Nat Geosci. doi:10.1038.ngeo102
  26. Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA et al (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103:351–370Google Scholar
  27. Herrero M, Thornton PK, Havlík P and Rufino M (2011) Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: mitigation options and trade-offs. In: Wollenberg E, Nihart ML, Tapio-Bistrom, Seeberg-Elverfeldt C (eds) Climate change mitigation and agriculture. Earthscan from Routledge/CGIAR, London/Rome, pp 316–332Google Scholar
  28. HLPE-3 (2012) Food security and climate change. High Level Panel of Experts, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  29. HLPE-4 (2012) Social protection for food security. High Level Panel of Experts, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  30. Holdren JP (2008) Meeting the climate change challenge. In: Eighth annual JH Chaffe memorial lecture on science and the environment. National Council for Science and the Environment(NCSE), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Houghton RA (2003) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B 55:378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Houghton RA (2010) How well do we know the flux of CO2 from land-use change? Tellus B 62:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR and others (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press/WMO, Geneva/CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Kreye C, Bouman BAM, Castañeda AR et al (2009) Possible causes of yield failure in tropical aerobic rice. Field Crop Res 111:197–206Google Scholar
  36. Lal R (2001) Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Clim Change 15:35–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29:437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lal R (2004a) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int 30:981–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lal R (2004b) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yield in the developing countries through restoration of soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad Dev 17:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lal R (2007) There is no such thing as a free biofuel from crop residues. CSA News 52:12–13Google Scholar
  42. Lal R (2008) Crop residues as soil amendments and feedstock for bioethanol production. Waste Manage 28:747–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lal R (2009a) Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. Eur J Soil Sci 60:158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lal R (2009b) Soil quality impacts of residue removal for bioethanol production. Soil Tillage Res 102:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lal R (2010a) Beyond Copenhagen: mitigating climate change and achieving food security through soil carbon sequestration. Food Secur 2(2):169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lal R (2010b) Enhancing eco-efficiency in agroecosystems through soil C sequestration. Crop Sci 50:S120–S131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lal R (2010c) Managing soils and ecosystems for mitigating anthropogenic carbon emissions and advancing global food security. BioScience 6(9):708–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lal R, Augustin B (2011) Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  49. Lal R, Pimentel D (2007) Biofuels from crop residues. Soil Tillage Res 93:237–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lal R, Delgado JA, Gulliford J et al (2012) Adapting agriculture to drought and extreme events. J Soil Water Conserv 67(6):153A–157AGoogle Scholar
  51. LeQuéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG et al (2009) Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci. doi:10.1038/ngeo689
  52. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebald C et al (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 31:607–610Google Scholar
  53. Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lorenz K, Lal R (2005) The depth distribution of soil organic carbon in relation to land use and management and the potential of carbon sequestration in sub-soil horizons. Adv Agron 88:36–66Google Scholar
  55. McKinsey & Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy. Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. https://solutions.mckinsey.com/climatedesk/default/en-us/contact_us/fullreport.aspx
  56. NRC (2009) Emerging technologies to benefit farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Park S, Croteau P, Boering KA et al (2012) Trends and seasonal cycles in the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since 1940. Nat Geosci 5:261–265Google Scholar
  58. Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Le Quéré C et al (2001) Climate change 2001: working group I: the scientific basis; 3. The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide in scientific basis. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Reay DS, Davidson EA, Smith KA et al (2012) Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat Clim Change 2:410–416Google Scholar
  60. Ruddiman WF (2003) The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Clim Change 61:261–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Satterthwaite D, McGranahan G, Tacoli C (2010) Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365(1554):2809–2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Searchinger TD, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319:1238–1240. doi:10.1126/science.1151861 Google Scholar
  63. Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J et al (2009) Climate change. Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326:527–528. doi:10.1126/science.1178797 Google Scholar
  64. Sejian V, Rotz CA, Lakritz J et al (2011) Forage and flax seed impact on enteric methane emission in dairy cows. Res J Vet Sci 4:1–8Google Scholar
  65. Sejian V, Lakritz J, Ezeji T, Lal R (2012) Environmental stress and amelioration in livestock production. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Selhorst A, Lal R (2012) Effects of climate and soil properties on U.S. home lawn soil organic carbon concentration and pool. Environ Manag 50:1177–1192. doi:10.1007/s00207-012-9956-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snyder CS, Bruulsema TW, Jensen TL, Fixen PE (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. West TO, Marland G (2002) A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zirkle G, Lal R, Agustin B (2011) Modeling carbon sequestration in home lawns. Hortic Sci 46:808–814Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carbon Management and Sequestration CenterOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations