Advertisement

A Historical Overview of Social Representation of Earthquake Risk in Japan: Fatalism, Social Reform, Scientific Control and Collaborative Risk Management

  • Katsuya Yamori
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 33)

Abstract

The historical development of social representations of earthquake risk in Japan can be summarised in terms of four stages: fatalism (before the eighteenth century), social reform (from the mid-nineteenth century), scientific control (after World War II) and collaborative risk management (after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in 1995). This evolution is not a linear, chronological movement through these modes of representation. Rather, these four basic styles of risk representation create a multilayered structure, allowing two or more types of risk representation to coexist. In Japanese society since the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, in particular, these four types of social representation of earthquake risk have developed into a complicated mixture. Seismologists have publicly referred to the ‘failure of earthquake sciences’, and criticism from society is increasing in regard to the ineffectiveness of safety measures regarding nuclear power plants. Thus, confidence in scientific control, which previously had been trusted and relied upon, is greatly shaken. Concurrent with this declining trust in science, vernacular science knowledge regarding disaster and disaster prevention is being disseminated at much higher rates to society at large, and the line separating such vernacular knowledge, older traditional views and ‘pure’ scientific knowledge is being blurred. Hence, a growing trend towards cognitive polyphasia (Moscovici 1976) is apparent. Furthermore, because widespread damage occurred in spite of the mutual cooperation of residents of local communities at the time of the emergency tsunami evacuation, the limits of collaborative risk management, which came into prominence after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, have been quickly indicated. Meanwhile, through statements such as that by a prominent politician claiming that “this disaster is divine punishment for our selfishness”, and arguments that the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 should represent a great turning point for an economically and politically stagnant Japanese society, it has become evident that old risk representation styles such as fatalism and social reform also remain firmly entrenched.

Keywords

Social Representation Earthquake Damage Social Reform Earthquake Risk Japan Trench 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atsumi T (1997) Disaster relief efforts by Japanese governmental and non-governmental organizations: impact of the Hanshin Earthquake on domestic and international disaster relief. Papers and proceedings of international symposium on disaster and health, Manila, 1997Google Scholar
  2. Atsumi T, Suzuki I (2003) A nationwide network of disaster NPO’s to cope with regional vulnerability in Japan. Paper presented at the third DPRI-IIASA international symposium on integrated disaster risk management: coping with regional vulnerability, Kyoto, 2003Google Scholar
  3. Britton N (2006) National planning and response: national systems. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 347–367Google Scholar
  4. Gallup Inc. (2012) The impact of The Great Tohoku Earthquake on people’s attitude towards nuclear power station. http://donjon.rulez.jp/refeqsum/Gallup-110420.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  5. Hiroi O (1986) Disasters and Japanese people. Jiji-Tushin-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosobuchi J (2011) Pre-disaster recovery planning: Tokyo. Paper presented at the international recovery forum 2011, Kobe, 2011Google Scholar
  7. Japan National Council of Social Welfare (2012) Statistics report on volunteer people in the Great Tohoku Earthquake. http://www.saigaivc.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  8. Japanese Cabinet Office (2006) Disaster management in Japan. http://www.bousai.go.jp/panf/saigaipanf.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  9. Japanese Cabinet Office (2010) White paper on disaster management 2010. http://www.bousai.go.jp/hakusho/h22/index.htm. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  10. Joffe H (1999) Risk and ‘the other’. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joffe H (2003) Risk: from perception to social representation. Br J Soc Psychol 42:55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joffe H (2011) Thematic analysis. In: Harper D, Thompson AR (eds) Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jovchelovitch S (2002) Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation. Psychologie et Société 5:121–138Google Scholar
  14. Jovchelovitch S (2007) Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kato T, Nakabayashi I, Ichiko T (2008) Development of planning support system for urban rehabilitation and reconstruction. J Disaster Res 3(6):422–428Google Scholar
  16. Kawata Y (1997) Prediction of loss of human lives due to catastrophic earthquake disaster. J Nat Disaster Sci 16:3–14Google Scholar
  17. Kingston J (ed) (2012) Natural disaster and nuclear crisis in Japan: response and recovery after Japan’s 3/11. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kingston J (2011) Foreign policy: Tsunami–Japan’s post-Fukushima future. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/tutEkfeUr4fOa3v/06282011_Tsunami.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  19. Kitahara I (2000) Social history of earthquakes in Japan: the Ansei Edo Earthquake and Japanese people. Kodansha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitazawa R (1973) Collection of Rakuten cartoon: Taisho period version. Graphic-sha, OhamiyaGoogle Scholar
  21. Koshizawa A (2011) Shinpei Goto: the Great Kanto Earthquake and reconstruction of imperial capital Tokyo. Chikuma Shobo Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  22. McCormack G (2001) The emptiness of Japanese affluence. M.E. Sharp, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Miyata N, Kitani M, Imada Y, Takada M, Kitahara I (1995) Catfish cartoon picture: earthquakes and Japanese culture. Ribun Shuppann Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  24. Moscovici S (1976) La Psychanalyse, Son Image et Son Public, 2nd edn. Press Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakabayashi I, Aiba S, Ichiko T (2008) Pre-disaster restoration measure of preparedness for post-disaster restoration in Tokyo. J Disaster Res 3(6):407–421Google Scholar
  26. Nakada M (1985) Disaster and Japanese people: natural disasters as psychological phenomena. Unpublished manuscript. http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/∼info-pat/disastersandJ.htm. Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  27. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2011) Change of Japanese people’s attitude towards science and technology after the 3.11 disaster: based on a monthly attitude survey of science and technology http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu0/shiryo/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/06/10/1307169_07.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  28. Ouwehand C (1964) Namazu-e and their themes: an interpretative approach to some aspects of Japanese folk religion. E.J. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  29. Palm R (1998) Urban earthquake hazards: the impacts of culture on perceived risk and response in the USA and Japan. Appl Geogr 18(1):35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sankei Newspaper (2011) “A serious defeat of seismology”: unusual self-criticizing statement at the symposium of Seismological Society of Japan. 16 Oct 2011. http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/news/111016/dst11101607570002-n1.htm. Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  31. Sankei Newspaper (2012) Unguarded, unprepared: “No expectation of huge earthquake,” “Over-trust on a giant seawall”, 10 Mar 2012Google Scholar
  32. Shaw R (2003) The role of non-governmental organizations in earthquake disaster management: an Asian perspective. Reg Dev Dialogue 24(1):117–29Google Scholar
  33. Shaw R, Goda K (2004) From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters 28(1):16–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Terada T (2011) Natural disaster and Japanese people. Kadokawa Shoten Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  35. The Japan Times (2011) The Japan Times special report 3.11: a chronicle of events following the Great East Japan Earthquake. The Japan Times Ltd., June 2011Google Scholar
  36. The Japan Times (2012) The Japan Times special report: 3.11, one year on – a chronicle of Japan’s road to recovery. The Japan Times Ltd., April 2012Google Scholar
  37. Tokyo Electric Company (2006) Questionnaire survey on earthquake countermeasures at home: TEPORE members internet research. http://www.tepore.com/research/co/060831/page02.htm. Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  38. Tokyo Metropolitan Government (2003) Preparation for recovery by the TMG: TMG earthquake disaster recovery manual. http://www.bousai.metro.tokyo.jp/japanese/knowledge/material_t.html. Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  39. Wagner W, Duveen G, Verma J, Temel M (2000) I have faith and at the same time I don’t believe: cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 10(4):301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagner W, Hayes N (2005) Everyday discourse and common sense: the theory of social representation. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner W (2007) Vernacular science knowledge: its role in everyday life communication. Public Underst Sci 16(1):7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weinstein ND (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):806–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamaori T (2011) Peaceful death in our days. At-pluss 8:154–167Google Scholar
  44. Yamori K (2007) Disaster risk sense in Japan and gaming approach to risk communication. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 25(2):101–131Google Scholar
  45. Yamori K (in press) Revisiting the concept of tsunami tendenko: Tsunami evacuation behavior in the Great East Japan Earthquake. In: Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University (ed) Natural disaster science and mitigation engineering: DPRI reports, vol 1, Investigation on the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  46. Yatsuzuka I (1999) The activity of disaster relief volunteers from the viewpoint of social representations: social construction of borantia (volunteer) as a new social reality after the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake in Japan. In: Sugiman T, Karasawa M, Liu J, Ward C (eds) Progress in Asian social psychology, vol 2. Kyoyook Kwahaksa, Seoul, pp 275–290Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Disaster Prevention Research InstituteKyoto UniversityUjiJapan

Personalised recommendations