Abstract
Cultural differences in learning-related dispositions are investigated amongst 7,300 first year students from 81 different nationalities, using the framework of Hofstede (Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly Hills, 1980). Comparing levels and intercorrelations of implicit theories of intelligence, effort beliefs, academic motivation, achievement goals, learning styles and approaches, and subject attitudes learns that traditional dichotomies often postulated in learning theories, such as those of surface versus deep learning, intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, self-regulation of learning versus external regulation, and mastery goals versus performance goals, do not manifest in different cultural clusters. In contrast, cluster profiles tend to be rather balanced. Cultural differences in intercorrelations are substantial and again indicate the difficulty of constructing culture-invariant learning theories. One of these differences regards the differentiation of several facets in performance goals and in different aspects of memorisation-based learning processes. Compared to students from other cultures, students of the Confucian culture appear to possess relative undifferentiated conceptions of performance goals and memorisation-based learning processes, what is at odds with contemporary theories of the Chinese learner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barmeyer, C. I. (2004). Learning styles and their impact on cross-cultural training: An international comparison in France, Germany and Quebec. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 577–594.
Blackwell, L. S. (2002). Psychological mediators of student achievement during the transition to junior high school: The role of implicit theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Bond, M. H., et al. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 395–412.
Boyle, E. A., Duffy, T., & Dunleavy, K. (2003). Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt’s Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 267–290.
Dauphinee, T. L., Schau, C., & Stevens, J. J. (1997). Survey of attitudes toward statistics: Factor structure and factorial invariance for women and men. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 129–141.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology press.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Ecles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guilford Press.
Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2004). Learning styles and approaches to studying. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 537–542). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Eringa, K., & Huei-Ling, Y. (2009). Chinese students’ perceptions of the intercultural competence of their tutors in PBL. In D. Gijbels & P. Daly (Eds.), Real learning opportunities at business school and beyond (Advances in business education and training, Vol. 2, pp. 17–37). Amsterdam: Springer.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.
Hilton, S. C., Schau, C., & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Survey of attitudes toward statistics: Factor structure invariance by gender and by administration time. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 92–109.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55, 1355–1361.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. and expanded 3rd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 69–85.
Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2005). “Towards a mapping the student world”: The identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. The British Accounting Review, 37, 177–204.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89–118.
Meyer, J. H. F. (2004). An introduction to the RoLITM. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 491–497.
Meyer, J. H. F. (2010). Helping our students: Learning, metalearning, and threshold concepts. In Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 191–213). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1997). Variation in students’ conceptions of learning: An exploration of cultural and discipline effects. Research and Development in Higher Education, 20, 491–497.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1999). On the operationalisation of conceptions of learning and their association with students’ knowledge and experiences of learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18, 289–302.
Minkov, M. (2009). Predictors of differences in subjective well-being across 97 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 152–179.
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 288–293.
Rienties, B., & Tempelaar, D. (in press). The role of cultural dimensions of international and Dutch students on academic and social integration and academic performance in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.11.004
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Schau, C., Stevens, J., Dauphinee, T. L., & Del Vecchio, A. (1995). The development and validation of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 868–875.
Tempelaar, D. T., Gijselaers, W. H., Schim van der Loeff, S., & Nijhuis, J. G. (2007). A structural equation model analyzing the relationship of student personality factors and achievement motivations, in a range of academic subjects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 105–131.
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89–99.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359–385.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy – Value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 92–120). San Diego: Academic.
Wigfield, A., Tonk, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 165–198). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Williamson, D. (2002). Forward from a critique of Hofstede’s model of national culture. Human Relations, 55, 1373–1395.
Yamazaki, Y. (2005). Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 521–548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tempelaar, D.T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., van der Loeff, S.S. (2013). Cultural Differences in Learning Dispositions. In: Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Milter, R. (eds) Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6137-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6137-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6136-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6137-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)