Knowledge and Space in Economic History: Innovations in the German Empire, 1877–1918

Chapter
Part of the Knowledge and Space book series (KNAS, volume 5)

Abstract

Analyzing a new data set of 39,343 high-value patents, the authors find ample evidence that interindustry knowledge spillover between technologically, economically, and geographically related industries were a major source of innovative activities during German industrialization. It is discovered that most of the parallel patent booms of the successive waves of technological progress (railroads, dyes, chemicals, and electrical engineering) occurred in innovative industries that were closely related technologically. The authors then show that these industries were often also geographically clustered. Nearly all German regions that maintained or improved their above-average innovativeness over time had at least one innovative cluster in the fields of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, or chemicals. The existence and success of these innovative clusters suggest that knowledge spillover between firms of different industries occurred frequently and increased the innovative output of the firms involved.

Keywords

Electrical Engineering Knowledge Spillover Patent Activity Related Industry German Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P. (2008). Higher education and innovation. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baten, J., Spadavecchia, A., Streb, J., & Yin, S. (2007). What made southwest German firms innovative around 1900? Assessing the importance of intra- and inter-industry externalities. Oxford Economic Papers, 59, i105–i126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantwell, J. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, G. (2007). A farewell to alms: A brief history of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Degner, H. (2009). Schumpeterian German firms before and after World War I: The innovative few and the non-innovative many. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte, 54, 50–72.Google Scholar
  7. Degner, H., & Streb, J. (2010). Foreign patenting in Germany, 1877–1932 (FZID Discussion Papers 21-2010). Hohenheim: Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).Google Scholar
  8. DeLong, J. B., & Shleifer, A. (1993). Princes and merchants: European city growth before the Industrial Revolution. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denison, E. F. (1967). Why growth rates differ: Postwar experience in nine western countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Döring, T. (2004). Räumliche Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wirtschaftswachstum [Spatial knowledge spillover and regional economic growth]. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124, 95–137.Google Scholar
  11. Fremdling, R. (1975). Eisenbahnen und deutsches Wirtschaftswachstum 1840–1879 [Railroads and German economic growth, 1840–1879]. Dortmund: Gesellschaft für westfälische Wirtschaftsgeschichte.Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J. K. (1957). American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power (2nd ed.). London: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Labuske, K., & Streb, J. (2008). Technological creativity and cheap labor? Explaining the growing international competitiveness of German mechanical engineering before World War I. German Economic Review, 9, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landes, D. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Lundvall, B.-Ả. (1988). Systems of innovation as an interactive process: From user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  20. Metz, R., & Watteler, O. (2002). Historische Innovationsindikatoren: Ergebnis einer Pilotstudie [Historical innovation indicators]. Historical Social Research, 27, 4–129.Google Scholar
  21. Mokyr, J. (1990). The levers of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pakes, A. (1986). Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica, 54, 755–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polanyi, M. (1989). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Reichspatentamt (Ed.). (1914). Blatt für Patent-, Muster- und Zeichenwesen [Patent, Design, and Drafting Registry]. Berlin: Carl Heymanns.Google Scholar
  28. Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96, 1052–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seckelmann, M. (2006). Industrialisierung, Internationalisierung und Patentrecht im Deutschen Reich, 1871–1914 [Industrialization, internationalization, and patent law in the German Empire, 1871–1914]. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  30. Sokoloff, K. L. (1988). Inventive activity in early industrial America: Evidence from patent records, 1790–1846. Journal of Economic History, 48, 813–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spoerer, M., Baten, J., & Streb, J. (2007). Wissenschaftlicher Standort, Quellen und Potentiale der Innovationsgeschichte [Scientific location, sources, and potential of innovation history]. In R. Walter (Ed.), Innovationsgeschichte (pp. 39–59). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  32. Streb, J. (2003). Shaping the national system of inter-industry knowledge exchange: Vertical integration, licensing and repeated knowledge transfer in the German plastics industry. Research Policy, 32, 1125–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Streb, J. (2004). Product differentiation by bundling standard good and innovative knowledge: Technological transfer in the German plastics industry from the 1930s to the 1970s. Journal of European Economic History, 33, 71–106.Google Scholar
  34. Streb, J., Baten, J., & Yin, S. (2006). Technological and geographical knowledge spillover in the German Empire 1877–1918. Economic History Review, 59, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Streb, J., Wallusch, J., & Yin, S. (2007). Knowledge spill-over from new to old industries: The case of German synthetic dyes and textiles 1878–1913. Explorations in Economic History, 44, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sullivan, R. J. (1994). Estimates of the value of patent rights in Great Britain and Ireland, 1852–1976. Economica, New Series, 61, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Department of Economic and Social HistoryUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations