Social Justice in the Context of Fisheries – A Governability Challenge

Chapter
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 7)

Abstract

Social justice figures among the key concerns of fisheries governance. This is for various reasons; one being that it is an important value in and of itself. Fisheries governance as a distributional and potentially disempowering or empowering mechanism should be evaluated on the basis of whether it works in accordance with general justice principles, such as those pertaining to human rights. However, as is argued in this chapter, justice is also an important governability condition. Without justice, stakeholders are likely to revolt against governing efforts to sustain the resource or to promote development. This chapter draws on international experiences to illustrate what justice as a governance principle implies for fisheries.

Keywords

Interactive governance Social justice Governability Governance orders Fisheries 

References

  1. Bavinck, M. (2001). Marine resource management: Conflict and regulation in the fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Berkes, F., Hughes, T.P., Steneck, R.S., Wilson, H.A., Bellwood, D.R., Crona, B., Folke, C., Gunderson, L.H., Leslie, H.M., Norberg, J., Nyström, M., Olsson, P., Osterblom, H., Scheffer, H., Worm, B. (2008). Globalization, roving bandits and marine resources. Science, 311(5767), 1557–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bojer, H. (2006). Distributional justice: Theory and measurement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2007). Step zero for fisheries co-management: What precedes implementation. Marine Policy, 31, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuenpagdee, R., Degnbol, P., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Johnson, D., Pullin, R., Williams, S. (2005). Challenges and concerns in capture fisheries and aquaculture. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.). Fish for life: Interactive fisheries for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dahl, R.A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, A., & Jentoft, S. (2001). The challenge and promise of indigenous peoples’ fishing rights – From dependency to agency. Marine Policy, 25(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Degnbol, D., & Wilson, D.C. (2008). Spatial planning on the North Sea: A case of cross-scale linkages. Marine Policy, 32, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elster, J. (1992). Local Justice. How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Eythòrsson, E. (2003). The coastal Sami: A ‘pariah caste’ of the Norwegian fisheries? A reflection on ethnicity and power in Norwegian resource management. In S. Jentoft, H. Minde, R. Nilsen (Eds.), Indigenous people: Resource management and global rights (pp. 149–162). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J, (1987). The theory of communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Haldemann, F. (2008). Another kind of justice: Transitional justice as recognition. Cornell International Law Journal, 41(2), 675–737.Google Scholar
  13. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hauck, M. (2008). Rethinking small-scale fisheries compliance: From criminal justice to social justice. PhD thesis, Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  15. Hernes, H. K., Jentoft, S., Mikalsen, K.H. (2005). Fisheries governance, social justice and participatory decision-making (pp. 103–118). In T. Gray (Ed.), Participation in fisheries governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  16. Hersoug, B. (2006, November 3–7). Opening the tragedy. SAMUDRA Report No. 45.Google Scholar
  17. Honneth, A. (2001). Recognition or redistribution: Changing perspective on the moral order of society. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2–3), 43–55.Google Scholar
  18. Jagers, S., Berlin, B., Jentoft, S. (2012). Why comply? Attitudes towards harvest regulations among Swedish fishers. Marine Policy, 36(5), 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jentoft, S. (1993). Dangling lines: The fisheries crisis and the future of coastal communities. The Norwegian experience. St. John’s: ISER Books.Google Scholar
  20. Jentoft, S. (2000). Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 24(2), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jentoft, S. (2004). The community in fisheries management: Challenges, opportunities and risks. In B. Hersoug, S. Jentoft, P. Degnbol (Eds.), Fisheries development: The institutional challenge (pp. 93–129). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  22. Jentoft, S. (2007). In the power of power: The understated aspect of fisheries management. Human Organization, 66(4), 426–437.Google Scholar
  23. Jentoft, S. (2011). Fisheries development as freedom. In R. Chuenpagdee (Ed.), World small-scale fisheries: Contemporary visions (pp. 367–379). Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Jentoft, S., & Karlsen, G.R. (1997). Saami fisheries, quota management, and the rights issue. In G. Pàlsson, & G. Petursdottir (Eds.), Social implications of quota systems in fisheries (pp. 147–164). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, Tema Nord Fisheries.Google Scholar
  26. Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D., Kaleekal, T. (2009). Co-management and legal pluralism: How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  27. Jentoft, S., Onyango, P., Islam, M.M. (2010). Freedom and poverty in the fishery commons. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 345–366.Google Scholar
  28. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Kooiman, J. (2008). Exploring the concept of governability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mikalsen, K.H., Hernes, H.K., Jentoft, S. (2007). Leaning on user-groups: The role of civil society in fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 31, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Perusse Daigle, C., Loomis, D.K., Ditton, R.B. (1996). Procedural justice in fishery resource allocations. Fisheries, 21(11), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pojman, L. (2001). Justice as desert. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 1, 88.Google Scholar
  36. Proudhon, P.-J. (1840[1890]). What is property?. New York: Humboldt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, J. (1971/1973). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Samudra. (2008a). No. 49, Tripartite Report of ICSF. http://www.springerlink.com/content/100370
  39. Schattschneider, E.E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.Google Scholar
  40. Schlosberg, D. (2003). The justice of environmental justice: Reconciling equity, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In A. Light, & A. de-Shalit (Eds.), Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Song, A.M., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). Conservation principle: A normative imperative in addressing illegal fishing in Lake Malawi. MAST, 10(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  43. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defence of pluralism and equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, D.C., Nielsen, J.R., Degnbol, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Fisheries co-management experience: Accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and EconomicsUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations