Advertisement

Concerns and Problems in Fisheries and Aquaculture – Exploring Governability

  • Svein Jentoft
  • Ratana Chuenpagdee
Chapter
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 7)

Abstract

Concerns, problems and issues in fisheries and aquaculture are, in many instances, undermined by the lack of a thorough examination of their nature and of the characteristics of the associated systems. Their persistence creates governability challenges, which have restricted effective policy interventions. In order to improve governability, we submit that there is a need to first recognize the complexity of the problems, and then conceptualize them in a way that points towards solutions. In so doing, it may reveal not only limits to governance but also the opportunities and possibilities that exist to enhance governability, i.e., the overall quality for governance.

Keywords

Governability assessment Interactive governance Wicked problems Fisheries Aquaculture 

References

  1. Archeson, J.M. (2006). Institutional failure in resource management. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, M., & Waldo, S. (2009). Fixing problems in fisheries – Integrating ITQs, CBM and MPAs in management. Marine Policy, 33, 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butcher, J.G. (2004). The closing of the frontier: A history of the marine fisheries of Southeast Asia ca 1850–2000. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Christie, P., McCay, B.J., Miller, M.L., Lowe, C., White, A.T., Stoffle, R., Fluharty, D.L., McManus, L.T., Chuenpagdee, R., Pomeroy, C., Suman, D.O., Blount, B.G., Huppert, D., Eisma, R.L.V., Oracion, E., Lowry, K., Pollnac, R.B. (2003). Toward developing a complete understanding: A social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries, 28(12), 22–26.Google Scholar
  5. Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). A matter of scale: prospects in small-scale fisheries. In R. Chuenpagdee (Ed.), Contemporary visions for world small-scale fisheries (pp. 21–36). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  6. Chuenpagdee, R., Morgan, L.E., Maxwell, S.M., Norse, E.A., Pauly, D. (2003). Shifting gears: Assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in the U.S. waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(10), 517–524.Google Scholar
  7. Degnbol, P., & McCay, B.J. (2007). Unintended consequences of ignoring linkages in fisheries systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64(4), 793–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilmore, W.S., & Camilius, J.C. (1996). Do your planning processes meet the reality check? Long Range Planning, 29(6), 869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanna, S., & Jentoft, S. (1996). The human use of the environment: An overview of social and economic dimensions. In S. Hanna, K. Folke, K-G. Mähler, K. Arrow (Eds.), Rights to nature (pp. 35–55). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 31, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.Google Scholar
  12. Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Jentoft, S., & McCay, B.J. (1995). User participation in fisheries management: Lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy, 19(3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D., Kaleekal, T. (2009). Co-management and legal pluralism: How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  15. Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee R., & Pascual-Fernandez, J. (2011) What MPAs are for. On Goal Formation and Displacement. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(1), 75–83.Google Scholar
  16. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance for natural resources: Choices, values and principles. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahon, R., McConney, P., Roy, R.N. (2008). Governing fisheries as complex systems. Marine Policy, 32, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McEvoy, A.F. (1990). The fisherman’s problem: Ecology and law in the California fisheries, 1850–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., Torres, F. Jr. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. Science, 279, 860–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  24. Turnbull, N. (2006). How should we theorize public policy? Problem solving and problematicity. Policy and Society, 25(2), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and EconomicsUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of GeographyMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations