Reason and Knowledge

  • Carlo Cellucci
Part of the Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning book series (LARI, volume 1)


The limitations of mathematical logic and the divorce of logic from method suggest that a different approach to logic is necessary, based on an alternative logic paradigm.


Human Nature Biological Evolution Cultural Evolution Extended Mind Unconscious Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Calvino, Italo. 1985. Mr. Palomar. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  2. Cellucci, Carlo. 2008a. Perché ancora la filosofia. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
  3. Dehaene, Stanislas, and Laurent Cohen. 2007. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Descartes, René. 1996. Œuvres, ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  5. Devlin, Keith. 2005. The math instinct. Why you’re a mathematical genius (along with lobsters, birds, cats, and dogs). New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, John. 1916. Essays in experimental logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey, John. 1938. Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  8. Fodor, Jerry Alan. 1981. Representations. Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ivancevic, Vladimir G., and Tijana T. Ivancevic. 2008. Quantum leap. From Dirac and Feynman, across the universe, to human body and mind. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  11. Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Critique of pure reason, ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical philosophy after 1781, ed. Henry Allison and Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mach, Ernst. 1976. Knowledge and error. Sketches on the psychology of enquiry. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. Collected papers, ed. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pinker, Steven. 1995. The language instinct. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  17. Plotkin, Henry. 1997. Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Renfrew, Andrew Colin. 2008. Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: The factuality of value and of the sacred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 2041–2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality. A philosophical inquiry into the nature and the rationale of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rescher, Nicholas. 2009. Unknowability. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, Bertrand. 1954. Human society in ethics and politics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Spelke, Elizabeth Shilin. 2011. Natural number and natural geometry. In Space, time and number in the brain, ed. Stanislas Dehaene and Elizabeth Merrit Brannon, 287–317. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sullivan, Philip Richard. 2009. Objects limit human comprehension. Biology and Philosophy 24: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suppes, Patrick. 1984. Probabilistic metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916, ed. Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe and Georg Henrik von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Cellucci
    • 1
  1. 1.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations