Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 1))

  • 1375 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 10 it has been argued that Frege’s analysis of deduction does not achieve his ideal of atomizing deduction. A better approximation to this ideal is provided by Gentzen’s analysis of deduction. In order to describe it, we need to fix some terminology and notation about first-order languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gentzen sequent calculus rules give an analysis of deducibility rather than deduction.

  2. 2.

    See Gentzen (1969, 77).

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 80.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., 81.

  5. 5.

    Prawitz (1971, 247).

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 246.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 247.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 259.

  11. 11.

    Prawitz (2011, 393).

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 387.

  13. 13.

    Prawitz (1971, 248).

  14. 14.

    See Prawitz (2006, 35–38); Prawitz (1971, 252–253).

  15. 15.

    See Prawitz (2006, 51); Prawitz (1971, 253).

  16. 16.

    See Prawitz (2006, 50–51).

  17. 17.

    Prawitz (1971, 259).

  18. 18.

    See Prawitz (2006, 53).

  19. 19.

    Gentzen (1969, 69).

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 149.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., 154.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 153.

  23. 23.

    Prawitz (2006, 35).

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 39–41.

  25. 25.

    Gentzen (1969, 68).

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 79.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 255.

  28. 28.

    See Shoesmith and Smiley (1978); Ungar (1992).

  29. 29.

    Gentzen (1969, 255).

  30. 30.

    See Cellucci (1992).

  31. 31.

    Zimmermann (2002, 562).

  32. 32.

    Prawitz (2011, 394, footnote 6).

  33. 33.

    See Read (2010); Wansing (2006).

  34. 34.

    Prawitz (2011, 395).

  35. 35.

    Belnap (1962, 1932).

References

  • Belnap, Nuel D. 1962. Tonk, plonk and plink. Analysis 22: 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, Carlo. 1992. Existential instantiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58: 111–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, Gerhard. 1969. Collected papers, ed. Manfred E. Szabo. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, Dag. 1971. Ideas and results in proof theory. In Proceedings of the second Scandinavian logic symposium, ed. Jens Erik Fenstad, 235–307. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, Dag. 2006. Natural deduction. A proof-theoretical study. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, Dag. 2011. Proofs and perfect syllogisms. In Logic and knowledge, ed. Carlo Cellucci, Emily Rolfe Grosholz, and Emiliano Ippoliti, 385–402. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Stephen. 2010. General-elimination harmony and the meaning of the logical constants. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39: 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoesmith, David John, and Timothy John Smiley. 1978. Multiple-conclusion logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, Anthony M. 1992. Normalization, cut-elimination and the theory of proofs. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansing, Heinrich. 2006. Connectives stranger than tonk. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35: 653–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Ernst. 2002. Peirce’s rule in natural deduction. Theoretical Computer Science 275: 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cellucci, C. (2013). Gentzen’s Approach to Logic. In: Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics