Advertisement

How Could Terrorism Be Justified?

  • Carl Wellman
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Law book series (BRIEFSLAW, volume 9)

Abstract

Terrorism cannot be justified either as he least harmful option or because it protects human rights alone because it both inflicts harms and violates human rights. However under very exceptional circumstances it might be justified when it both protects rights and prevents harms more than it violates rights and harms its victims. Although it cannot be justified merely because it equalizes rights violations, this may be a relevant consideration because the right to equitable treatment cannot be ignored in any possible justification. Terrorism could be justified because it liberates an oppressed people only if on balance it protects rights and prevents harms more fully than it violates rights and inflicts harms. It cannot be justified merely as an exercise of the right to self-determination or as a necessary means to a moral right because no moral right is absolute and unconditional. When terrorism is justified as a permissible tactic in a just war or as an exercise of the right to self-defense, this is because in this instance it protects rights and prevents harms more fully than it violates rights and inflicts harms. This might also be true when it is necessary to overcome an extreme emergency, although possibly an extreme emergency might exclude any judgment of wrongness without implying that terrorism is morally right. There is no objective evidence of any religious duty to engage in terrorism.

Keywords

Harms Human rights Equitable treatment Liberation Self-determination Just war Self-defense Necessary Supreme emergency Religious duty 

References

  1. Casals NT (2006) Group rights as human rights. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Combacau J (1986) The exception of self-defense in U.N. practice. In: Cassese A (ed) Current legal regulation of the use of force. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 9–38Google Scholar
  3. Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Dworkin R (1984) Rights as trumpts In jeremy waldron (ed) Theories of rights. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fanon F (1966) The wretched of the earth. Grove Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. General Assembly (1960) Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples. Yearbook of the United Nations 1960. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 49–50Google Scholar
  7. General Assembly (1987) Resolution 42/159. Measures to prevent international terrorism. Yearbook of the United Nations 1987. United Nations, New York, pp 1063–1965Google Scholar
  8. Hamas Charter (1988) Available on web at Hamas CharterGoogle Scholar
  9. Hare RM (1979) On terrorism. J Value Inq 13:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Held V (2008) How terrorism is wrong: morality and political violence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Honderich T (2008) Terrorism in palestine. In: Law S (ed) Israel, Palestine and terror. Continuum Publishing Group, London, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  12. Kahane M (1981) They must go. Grosset & Dunlop, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Keeton WP (1984) Prosser and keeton on the law of torts, 5th edn. West Publishing Co., Saint PaulGoogle Scholar
  14. Louw PE (2004) The rise, fall, and legacy of apartheit. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  15. Nickel JW (2007) Making sense of human rights. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Nickel JW (2008) Rethinking divisibility: towards a theory of supporting relations between human rights. Hum Rights Q 30:984–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen K (1981a) Violence and terrorism: its uses and abuses. In: Leiser BM (ed) Values in conflict: life, liberty, and the rule of law. Macmillan, New York, pp 435–470Google Scholar
  18. Nielsen K (1981b) On justifying terrorism. Inquiry 24:21–57Google Scholar
  19. Primoratz I (2007) Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/terrorism/Google Scholar
  20. Razack S (2003) Those who “Witness the Evil”. Hypatia 18:204–211Google Scholar
  21. Shue H (1980) Basic rights: subsistence, affluence and U. S. foreign policy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Valls A (2000) Can terrorism be justified? In: Valls A (ed) Ethics in international affairs: theories and cases. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 65–80Google Scholar
  23. Walzer M (2000) Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations, 3rd edn. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Wellman C (1987) Terrorism and moral rights. In: Howie J (ed) Ethical principles and practices. Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, pp 128–153Google Scholar
  25. Wellman C (1995) Real rights. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWashington University - St LouisSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations