Abstract
Globalization and intensified international cooperation have led to a significant transfer of power from democratic assemblies to governments, bureaucracies, and anonymous, or at least non-transparent, networks of agents largely free of political accountability. But how can democratic decision-making be established in a largely de-nationalized world? In this paper, I shall focus on John Burnheim’s conception of global “demarchy.” Since it is a thoroughly anti-statist conception flirting with certain anarchistic ideas, demarchy seems to be a fresh and interesting alternative. It suggests a variety of overlapping functional communities, communities of people who are confronted with one and the same social problem and therefore have a legitimate material interest in decisions of an authority that has the power to deal with the particular problem. Furthermore, in demarchy, decision-makers are not being elected but assigned by lot. Not many will find this conception feasible and attractive. However, a critical analysis of the shortcomings of “demarchy” can provide us with a clearer picture of today’s problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Baums, Ansgar. 2000. Normative Demokratiemodelle und Globalisierung. In Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der FU Berlin. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~segbers/working_papers/AP30.pdf.
Burnheim, John. 1985. Is democracy possible? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burnheim, John. 1986. Democracy, nation states, and the world system. In New forms of democracy, ed. D. Held and C. Pollit, 218–239. London: Sage.
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice interruptus. Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. London/New York: Routledge.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the global order. From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Höffe, Otfried. 1999. Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. München: Beck.
Martin, Brian. 1993. Making global decisions. Green Left, 3 November: 12. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/93gl2.html.
McGrew, Anthony. 1998. Demokratie ohne Grenzen? Globalisierung und demokratische Theorie und Politik. In Politik der Globalisierung, ed. Ulrich Beck, 374–422. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Rancière, Jacques. 1995. On the shores of politics. London/New York: Verso.
Streeck, Wolfgang (ed.). 1998. Internationale Wirtschaft und nationale Demokratie. Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.
Walzer, Michael. 1984. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hiebaum, C. (2013). Demarchy: A Dubious Conception of Global Democracy. In: Merle, JC. (eds) Spheres of Global Justice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5998-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5998-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5997-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5998-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)