Advertisement

Economic Citizenship Rights as Barriers to Trade? Production-Related Local Justice and Business-Driven Globalisation

  • Richard Sturn
Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, I present arguments supporting “economic citizenship rights,” viz. “citizenship property” related to the sphere of production. It is shown that specific circumstances characterizing employment contracts may justify norms, institutional patterns, and legislation beyond classical liberal rights. The arguments hold good under rather parsimonious normative foundations and rely mainly on production-specific premises such as incomplete contracts. In particular, they hold good even if no social human rights beyond the classical liberal canon are invoked. The postulates implied by the kind of argument presented here include the following: [1] The global market for corporate control as well as the competition between nation states for foreign direct investment ought to be regulated by a global framework of norms entailing certain minimum standards of “citizenship property” and [2] A global framework should avoid favouring a set of such norms linked to a particular tradition of corporate and political governance.

Keywords

Labour Market Corporate Social Responsibility Foreign Direct Investment World Trade Organisation Private Sphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Arneson, R.J. 1987. Meaningful work and market socialism. Ethics 97(3): 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, S. 1985. The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian models. American Economic Review 75(1): 16–36.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1993a. The revenge of homo oeconomicus: Contested exchange and the revival of political economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(1): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1993b. A political and economic case for economic democracy. Economics and Philosophy 9: 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coase, R. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3(3): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl, R.A. 1985. A preface to economic democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Epstein, R.A. 2000. Deconstructing privacy: And putting it back together again. Social Philosophy and Policy 17(2): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelk, S., and J. Worth. 2002. Trading it away: How GATS threatens UK higher education. www.peopleandplanet.org/tradejustice/Tradingitaway.pdf.
  10. Lerner, A. 1972. The economics and politics of consumer sovereignty. American Economic Review 62(2): 258–266.Google Scholar
  11. Macey, J.R. 1992. Some causes and consequences of the bifurcated treatment of economic rights and “other” rights under the United States constitution. Social Philosophy and Policy 9(1): 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Narveson, J. 1992. Democracy and economic rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 9(1): 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. O’Neill, O. 2005. Gerechtigkeit, Vertrauen und Zurechenbarkeit. In Gerechtigkeit: Auf der Suche nach einem Gleichgewicht, ed. O. Neumaier, C. Sedmak, and M. Zichy, 33–55. Frankfurt/Lancaster: Ontos.Google Scholar
  15. Schnitzer, M.C. 1994. Comparative economic systems, 6th ed. Cincinnati: College Division of South-Western Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Sinn, H.-W. 2004a. Der Kranke Europas. Diagnose und Therapie der deutschen Krankheit. Internationale Politik 59(85): 25–34.Google Scholar
  17. Sinn, H.-W. 2004b. Das Dilemma der Globalisierung. Forschungsgemeinschaft für Nationalökonomie. St. Gallen. Engl. Transl.: “The dilemma of globalisation: A German perspective. Economie Internationale 100: 111–120.Google Scholar
  18. Sturn, R. 1994. The firm as a political institution: Economic democracy and the tradability of labour. In Ökonomie als Raum sozialen Handelns, ed. A. Biesecker and K. Grenzdörffer, 107–131. Bremen: Donat Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. von Weizsäcker, C.Ch. 1999. Logik der Globalisierung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Public EconomicsKarl-Franzens-Universität GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations