Advertisement

World Poverty and the Duty to Aid

  • Johan Graafland
  • Mandy Bosma
Chapter

Abstract

Currently, many countries are reducing their contribution to development aid as a consequence of the economic crisis and the need for limiting government budget deficits. In the Netherlands, some political parties have proposed to abolish or substantially reduce the budget for development aid. In this paper, we analyse whether a case can be made in favour of a moral duty for the developed countries to alleviate poverty in the low developing countries (LDCs) through providing development aid. We will evaluate whether there is a duty to provide aid from the perspective of several liberal ethical positions: utilitarianism, negative rights ethics, duty ethics and basic rights ethics. In this way, we will be able to establish how robust the moral duty for development aid is. We conclude that we find that the moral duty to aid is quite robust if development aid can effectively reduce poverty. If development aid is not effective, most theories imply that rich countries do not have a duty to aid developing countries, but rather should reform the existing global institutional order to diminish perverse incentives.

Keywords

Rich Country Moral Duty Debt Relief Positive Duty Duty Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Brand Commission. 1983. Common crisis north–south: Co-operation for world recover. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  2. Burnside, C., and D. Dollar. 2000. Aid, policies and growth. American Economic Review 90(4): 847–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duchrow, U. 1987. Global economy, a confessional issue for the churches? Geneve: World Council of Churches.Google Scholar
  4. Easterly, W., R. Levine, and D. Roodman. 2004. Aid, policies and growth. Comment. The American Economic Review 94: 774–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fieldhouse, D.K. 1999. The west and the third world. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Gupta, S., B. Clements, A. Pivorarsky, and E.R. Tiongson. 2003. Foreign aid and revenue response: Does the composition of aid matter? Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Foundation. Working paper 3/176.Google Scholar
  7. Klein, N. 2002. No logo. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
  8. Landes, D.S. 1998. Arm en rijk (The wealth and poverty of nations. Why some are so rich and some so poor). Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
  9. Norberg, Johan. 2002. Leve de globalisering. Antwerpen: Houtekiet.Google Scholar
  10. Novak, M. 1982. The spirit of democratic capitalism. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Pogge, T. 2001. Priorities of global justice. In Global justice, ed. T. Pogge, 6–23. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Rajan, R., and A. Subramanian. 2005a. Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show? Washington, D.C: International Monetary Foundation. Working paper 05/127.Google Scholar
  14. Rajan, R., and A. Subramanian. 2005b. What undermines aid’s impact on growth. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Foundation. Working paper 05/126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rawls, J. 1999. The law of peoples: With the idea of public reason revisited. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Roodman, D. 2004. The anarchy of numbers; aid, development, and cross-country empirics. Washington, D.C: Center for Global Development. Working paper 32.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A.K. 1984. Resources, values and development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Shleifer, A. 2004. Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Mimeo (January, 12). Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  19. Shue, H. 1996. Basic rights. Subsistence, affluence and U.S. foreign policy, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
  21. Singer, P. 2002. One world, the ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stiglitz, J. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Tinbergen, J. (ed.). 1977. RIO Reshaping the International Order. A report to the club of Rome. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.Google Scholar
  24. United Nations. 2005. Investing in development. A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. Overview at: www.unmilleniumproject.org.
  25. Velasquez, M.G. 1998. Business ethics. Concepts and cases, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. World Bank. 2003. Supporting sound policies with adequate and appropriate financing. Report DC2003-0016 prepared for the development committee. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEVCOMMINT/Documentation/20127712/DC2003-0016(E)-Financing.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics/Department of PhilosophyTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations