Advertisement

Beyond the Borders. Migration Policies, Justice and Citizenship from a Global Perspective

  • Juan Carlos VelascoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The universalistic logic of justice and human rights clashes with the particularistic logic of national sovereignty. This contraposition is thrown into sharp relief in the analysis of migration politics. This article provides an argumentation in favor of a flexibilization of the access to citizenship and of the conditions for border crossings as an appropriate institutional framework for the recognition of human rights and the implementation of distributive justice on a global scale. This thesis is developed in four stages by: offering some reasons for overcoming the state-centered focus of the Rawlsian theory of justice (1); describing poverty and the migrations that derive from it as a question of justice (2); analyzing the obstacles that state boundaries present at the moment of implementing a global conception of justice (3); and, finally, arguing in favor of a redefinition of the notion of citizenship that constitutes the normative horizon of migration policy (4).

Keywords

Political Community Migration Policy Planetary Scale State Sovereignty Global Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Barry, B. 1989. Theories of justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauböck, R. 2004. Cómo transforma la inmigración a la ciudadanía. In Inmigración y procesos de cambio, ed. G. Aubarell and R. Zapata, 197–214. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
  3. Bauböck, R. 2005. Expansive citizenship: Voting beyond territory and membership. Political Science and Politics 38(4): 763–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Beitz, C. 1979. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benhabib, S. 2004. The rights of others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brock, G. 2009. Immigration. In Global justice, ed. G. Brock, 190–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carens, J.H. 1987. Aliens and citizens: The case for open borders. Review of Politics 49: 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carens, J.H. 2004. La integración de los inmigrantes. In Inmigración y procesos de cambio, ed. G. Aubarell and R. Zapata, 393–420. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
  10. Castles, S. 2004. Globalización e inmigración. In Inmigración y procesos de cambio, ed. G. Aubarell and R. Zapata, 33–56. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
  11. Castles, S., and M. Miller. 2009. The age of migration. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, P. 2000. Philosophies of exclusion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dower, N. 1991. World poverty. In A companion to ethics, ed. P. Singer, 273–282. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Dummett, M. 2001. On immigration and refugees. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garzón, E. 1997. Cinco confusiones acerca de la relevancia moral de la diversidad cultural. Claves de Razón Práctica 74: 10–23.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. 2005. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  19. Höffe, O. 1999. Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  20. Hume, D. 1999. An enquiry concerning the principles of morals [1751]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Huntington, S.P. 2004. Who are we? New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Kymlicka, W. 2001. Territorial boundaries: A liberal egalitarian perspective. In Boundaries and Justice, ed. D. Miller and S.H. Hashmi, 249–275. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Merle, J.-C. 2002. État moderne et naturalisation. In Diversité humaine, ed. Lukas K. Sosoe, 217–226. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  24. Morris, L. 2002. Managing migration. Civic stratification and migrants’ rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ong, A. 1999. Flexible citizenship: The cultural logic of transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pogge, T. 2002. World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pogge, T. 2004. The incoherence between Rawls’s theories of justice. Fordham Law Review 72(5): 1739–1759.Google Scholar
  29. Pogge, T. 2005. Migration and poverty. In Contemporary political philosophy, ed. R. Goodin and P. Pettit, 710–720. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rawls, J. 2001. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sassen, S. 2005. Denationalization: Territory, authority and rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sen, A. 2005. Reif für die Freiheit. Internationale Politik 60(6): 34–38.Google Scholar
  34. Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Singer, P. 2002. One world. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Velasco, J.C. 2005. Estado nacional y derechos de los inmigrantes. Arbor 713: 37–48.Google Scholar
  37. Velasco, J.C. 2006. El estado y la ciudadanía ante el desafío de la immigración. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 27: 5–17.Google Scholar
  38. Velasco, J.C. 2010. La justicia en un mundo globalizado. Isegoría 43: 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Velasco, J.C. 2012. Fronteras abiertas, derechos humanos y justicia global. Arbor 755: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations