Six Sigma Methodology for the Environment Sustainable Development

  • Seifedine Kadry


The Six Sigma (6-σ) methodology, as it has evolved over the last two decades, provides a proven framework for problem solving and organizational leadership and enables leaders and practitioners to employ new ways of understanding and solving their sustainability problems. While business leaders now understand the importance of environmental sustainability to both profitability and customer satisfaction, few are able to translate good intentions into concrete, measurable improvement programs. Increasingly, these leaders are looking to their corps (Six Sigma experts) of Six Sigma “Master Black belts,” “Black belts,” and “Green belts” to lead and implement innovative programs that simultaneously reduce carbon emissions and provide large cost savings. In my experience, and that of many others, Six Sigma processes show a proven approach for businesses and organizations to improve their performance and that sustainability programs are in need of this operational approach and discipline. Six Sigma rigors will help a business leader to design a sustainable program for both short- and long-term value creations. The aim of this chapter is to show the importance of applying Six Sigma methodologies to multidisciplinary sustainability-related projects and how to implement it.


Sustainable development Six Sigma Carbon emissions Multi­disciplinary sustainability-related projects Carbon emissions 


  1. ASQ (2002) The Honeywell edge. Six Sigma Forum Mag 1(2):14–17Google Scholar
  2. Barney M (2002) Motorola’s second generation. Six Sigma Forum Mag 1(3):13–16Google Scholar
  3. Harry MJ (2000) A new definition aims to connect quality with financial performance. Qual Prog 33(1):64–66Google Scholar
  4. Harry MJ, Schroeder R (2000) Six Sigma – the break-through management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Soundview Exec Book Summ 22(11):2Google Scholar
  5. Harry MJ, Schroeder R (2002) Six Sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. McCarty T, Jordan M, Probst D (2011) Six Sigma for sustainability, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Puksic M, Goricanec D (2005) Increasing quality and economic efficacy of health institutions in public and private sectors in Slovenia. In: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS international conference on distance learning and web engineering, Corfu, Greece, 23–25 Aug, pp 59–64Google Scholar
  8. Securities and Exchange Commission 2010 guidance press release.; final rule:
  9. Slater R (1999) Jack Welch and the GE Way: management insights and leadership secrets of the legendary CEO. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Wessel G, Burcher P (2004) Six sigma for small and medium-sized enterprises. TQM Mag 16(4):264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentAmerican University of the Middle EastDasmanKuwait

Personalised recommendations