Skip to main content

From Academic Self-Governance to Executive University Management: Institutional Governance in the Eyes of Academics in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Work Situation of the Academic Profession in Europe: Findings of a Survey in Twelve Countries

Abstract

In recent years major shifts in the internal governance of universities occurred as a corollary of NPM-inspired reforms. Whereas the academic profession traditionally had a strong role in the internal steering of their institution, academic self-governance has been replaced by more top-down management practices in many higher education systems. This chapter attempts to analyse this shift by taking into account the views of the academic profession regarding their influence, participatory rights and perceptions of governance schemes prevailing at their institution in order to provide an overview of the state of reform and an assessment of the various university governance regimes in the countries represented in the EUROAC survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the – short lived – exception of the ‘group university’ in the 1970s and 1980s, for example, in Austria (UOG 1975), Germany (HRG 1976) and the Netherlands where more democratic decision-making structures also tried to integrate students and nonprofessorial staff more strongly by increasing their representation and voting power in university committees.

  2. 2.

    Also, stronger vertical differentiation between institutions.

  3. 3.

    The average of ten countries, not weighted.

References

  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B., & Musselin, C. (2011). New public management, network governance and organizational change in universities. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 161–176). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P. (2007). Resisting the evaluative state: Irish academics win the battle but lose the war. In G. Neave, J. Enders, & F. A. van Vught (Eds.), Towards a cartography of higher education policy change: A festschrift in honour of Guy Neave (pp. 111–118). Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of University systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations (pp. 137–152). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2006). The extent and impact of higher education governance reform across Europe. Final report to the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission. Part Three: Five case studies on governance reform. Enschede: CHEPS. http://ec.europa.eu/education/pdf/doc236_en.pdf

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechar, H. (2005). Hire and fire? Akademische Karrieren unter den Bedingungen des UG 2002. In H. Welte, M. Auer, & C. Meister-Scheytt (Eds.), Management an Universitäten: Zwischen Tradition und (Post-)Moderne (pp. 317–337). München: Rainer Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothblatt, S. (2003). The University as Utopia (The Hans Rausing Lecture 2002), Salvia Smaskrifter (University of Uppsala), no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2011). How changing governance and management affects the views and work of the academic profession. In W. Locke, W. K. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 223–242). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, E. (2013). From Academic Self-Governance to Executive University Management: Institutional Governance in the Eyes of Academics in Europe. In: Teichler, U., Höhle, E. (eds) The Work Situation of the Academic Profession in Europe: Findings of a Survey in Twelve Countries. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5977-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics