Skip to main content

A Portrait of Australia’s Children’s Courts: Findings of a National Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Australia's Children's Courts Today and Tomorrow

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 7))

Abstract

The Children’s Court is a critical social institution that decides important legal and social issues relating to children and families. This chapter reports the findings of a national study which canvassed the views of judicial officers and other key stakeholders in each of Australia’s eight States and Territories concerning the court’s contemporary status and challenges and future reform directions with a view to informing current policy debates and deliberations. It draws together the major themes that emerged from the analysis of data gathered from study participants in eight separate but parallel sub-studies conducted concurrently which together comprised the national study. Data were gathered in metropolitan and regional (and, in the larger States and Territories, remote) locations across Australia. The chapter provides an overview of Australia’s Children’s Courts before presenting the major findings. The national findings point to the need, for example, for additional resources for the court and the youth justice and child protection systems, for further training of courtroom personnel, for greater clarity about the role of lawyers, for the greater use of Indigenous sentencing courts and circles and for raising the lower age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 12 years. Two further prominent findings were concern about the underutilization of bail in general and in relation to Indigenous youth in particular and support for the broader use by Children’s Courts of the therapeutic jurisprudence-oriented problem-solving approaches already found in some other Australian courts. In conclusion, the chapter points to the underinvestment in Children’s Courts. While the inadequacy of resources is a common refrain across the public sector, in some jurisdictions the dearth of resources has placed the Children’s Court at risk of becoming a meaningless institution in the absence of the wherewithal to achieve its mandate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC). (2012). Australian crime: Facts and figures 2011. Canberra: Australian Institute o Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2012a). Child protection Australia, 2010–11 (Child Welfare Series No. 53, Catalogue number CWS 41). Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2012b). Juvenile detention population in Australia 2011 (Juvenile Justice Series No. 9, Catalogue number JUV 9). Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, L. A., & Cesaroni, C. (1999). Changing role of the youth court judge. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 3(7), 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, G., & Feinblatt, J. (2001). Problem-solving courts: A brief primer. Law and Policy, 23(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. (2002). Representing children and young people: A lawyer’s guide. Melbourne: Victoria Law Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, A. (2010). Indigenous participation in sentencing young offenders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, J. (2011). The link between child maltreatment and adolescent offending: Systems neglect of adolescents. Family Matters, 89, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Children’s Court of Victoria. (2010). Annual report 2009–2010. Melbourne: The Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyer, C. J. (2007). Innovation and discretion: The drug court as a people-processing institution. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(3), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Children and Young People WA (Western Australia). (2012). The state of Western Australia’s children and young people—Edition One. Subiaco: The Commission for Children and Young People.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneen, C., & White, R. (2007). Juvenile justice: Youth and crime in Australia (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. (2007). Non-adversarial approaches to criminal justice. Journal of Judicial Administration, 16, 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. (2011). Post-adversarial and post-inquisitorial justice: Transcending traditional penological paradigms. European Journal of Criminology, 8(1), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A., Kirby, P., & Ward, L. (2004). The report of the panel to oversee the consultation on protecting children: The Child Protection Outcomes Project. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y., & Cheung, P. P. L. (1985). The juvenile court as a people-processing organization: A political economy perspective. The American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 801–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (2008). Designing and managing programs (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, G. (2008). Autonomy vs beneficence: Ethics and the representation of children and young people in legal proceedings. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8(2), 392–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. (2003). Justice for families and young offenders: A unified court system as a 21st century reform. The John Barry Memorial Lecture. Melbourne: Department of Criminology, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, I. (1997). Models of juvenile justice. In A. Borowski & I. O’Connor (Eds.), Juvenile crime, justice and corrections (pp. 229–253). South Melbourne: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, S., & Croucher, R. F. (2011). Mind(ing) the gap: Law reform recommendations responding to child protection in a federal system. Family Matters, 89, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salusinszky, I. (2012). Youth bail laws to be eased. The Australian, 7 February, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J. (2005). Parental rights and the protection of children: A presumption against state intervention. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 7(2), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & O’Connor, I. (1997). Child abuse, youth homelessness and juvenile crime. In A. Borowski & I. O’Connor (Eds.), Juvenile crime, justice and corrections (pp. 121–150). South Melbourne: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). (2012). Report on Government Services 2012. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G. (2004). The ‘Australian settlement’ and Australian political thought. Australian Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Borowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borowski, A. (2013). A Portrait of Australia’s Children’s Courts: Findings of a National Assessment. In: Sheehan, R., Borowski, A. (eds) Australia's Children's Courts Today and Tomorrow. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5928-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics