Skip to main content

Will “Free Entry into the Forest” Remain?

Argumentation Analysis of Finnish and Swedish Discussions on Everyman’s Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Issues in Polar Tourism

Abstract

In Europe, the public right of access is most widely applied in the Nordic countries. So-called everyman’s rights give everyone the basic right to roam freely in the countryside, no matter who owns or occupies the land. What makes everyman’s rights problematic is that they do not cover activities which damage the environment or disturb others, but the understanding of damage and especially disturbance is situational and depends on subjective valuation. There has been a lot of debate around everyman’s rights over the past decade. Also, several surveys have been made for administrative purposes. By analyzing argumentation in recent discussion in the Internet, we evaluate in the article what are the most urgent issues at stake in Sweden and Finland. Our results show that the discussed themes vary from private ownership and national identity to commercialization and lifestyle. Especially berry pickers from Asian countries and the commercialization of recreational nature use have generated as well extreme nationalistic arguments as worried expressions of the ownership rights. A more moderate stance is to suggest negotiations between parties and to give more information in public. New devices to conceptualize the use of nature in a different way are slowly emerging but are not yet adapted to public common sense discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reference (Number + SWE/FI) refers to our empirical data of blog-writings in Sweden (SWE) or Finland (FI).

References

  • Fairclough N (1989) Language and power. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish Ministry of the Environment (2007) Everyman’s rights in Finland: public access to the countryside: rights and responsibilities. Edita Prima, Helsinki. Available at: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=25603&lan=fi. Accessed 27 Oct 2011

  • Fiske J (1990) Introduction to communication studies. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel A (1981) Forms of explanation: rethinking the questions in social theory. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2002) Scaling environmental issues: problems and paradoxes. Landsc Urban Plan 61:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2004) Retkeilyn rikkaus. Luonto ympäristöhuolen aikakaudella. Kustannus Oy Taide, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen A (2002) Metsänomistaja metsänsä hoitajana. Rutiinit, “tarjokkeet” ja vastavuoroisuus. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 67(2):134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenborn BP, Haaland H, Sandell K (2001) The public right of access -- some challenges to sustainable tourism development in Scandinavia. J Sustain Tour 9(5):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans R, Statham P (1999) Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4(2):203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehti L (2011) Blogging politics in various ways: a typology of French politicians’ blogs. J Pragmat 43:1610–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen S, Heikkinen T, Hirvonen J (2007) Jokamiehenoikeuksien tulkintoja ja haasteita luontoliikunnan ja -matkailun kannalta. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmän julkaisu 1/2007. Available at: http://www.maaseutupolitiikka.fi/files/50/YTR_1_07.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • Lomborg S (2009) Navigating the blogosphere: towards a genre-based typology of weblogs. First Monday 14(5). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2329/2178. Accessed 14 Nov 2012

  • Miettinen M-K (1997) Maanomistajien näkemykset jokamiehen oikeuksista ja niiden toimivuudesta. Master’s thesis in Sport sociology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Available: http://www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • Nardi BA, Schiano DJ, Gumbrecht M, Swartz L (2004) Commun ACM 47(12):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naturvårdsverket (2011) Naturvårdsverket gör utredning om allemansrätten. Available at: http://www.naturvardsverket.se/sv/Start/Friluftsliv/Allemansratten/Arbete-med-Allemansratten/Naturvardsverket-gor-utredning-om-allemansratten. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • Natural Resource Council (2008) Statement of the utilization of everyman’s rights and intensification of communication. Available at: http://www.mmm.fi/attachments/ymparisto/luonnonvara/5yFmNCu5z/LVNn_kannanotto_jokamiehenoikeuksien_hyodyntamisesta_12.6.2008.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • Ostrom E (2000) Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept? In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. The World Bank, Washington, pp 172–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer K (2003) Intimate citizenship: private decisions and public dialogues. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell K, Fredman P (2010) The right of public access – opportunity or obstacle for nature tourism in Sweden? Scand J Hosp Tour 10(3):291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki T (2001) Introduction: practice theory. In: Schatzki T, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London, pp 10–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1908/1971) The stranger. In: Simmel G (ed) On individuality and social forms: selected writings. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D (1998) The argument culture. Moving from debate to dialogue. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuulentie S (2001) Meidän vähemmistömme. Valtaväestön retoriikat saamelaisten oikeuksista käydyissä keskusteluissa. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljanen P, Rautiainen A (2007) Jokamiehenoikeuden toimivuus. Report by the Ministry of the Environment 19/2007. Available at: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=74190. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • Westerlund S (1991) EG:s miljöregler ur svenskt perspektiv. Naturskyddsföreningen, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seija Tuulentie Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tuulentie, S., Rantala, O. (2013). Will “Free Entry into the Forest” Remain?. In: Müller, D., Lundmark, L., Lemelin, R. (eds) New Issues in Polar Tourism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5884-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics