Design of an Actigraphy Based Architecture for Mental Health Evaluation

  • Mi-Hwa Song
  • Jae-Sung Noh
  • Seung-Min Yoo
  • Young-Ho Lee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 215)

Abstract

This paper introduces a decision support system architecture for continuous activity recognition and actigraphy, which are important for mental health evaluation; the architecture is based on triaxial accelerometer data. Recent developments in acceleration sensor device technologies have made it possible to precisely measure the acceleration of motor activity with a triaxial accelerometer for a lengthy period of time. We propose an AMD (Actigraphy based Mental health Decision support system) architecture for objectively measuring daily activity, recognizing continuous activities, and analyzing the behavior pattern of people with mental disorders, as well as the correlation between change in mood symptoms and mental disorders.

Keywords

Actigraphy Tri-axial accelerometer Activities of daily living Activity recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant no. 10037283 from the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy.

References

  1. 1.
    Tryon WW (1986) Motor activity measurements and DSM-III. Prog Behav Modif 20:35–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sobin C, Sackeim H (1997) Psychomotor symptoms of depression. Am J Psychiatry 154:4–17Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tryon WW (1991) Activity measurement in psychology and medicine. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finazzi ME, Mesquita ME, Lopes JR, Fu LI, Oliveira MG, Del Porto JA (2010) Motor activity and depression severity in adolescent outpatients. Neuropsychobiology 61:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Razavi N, Horn H, Koschorke P, Hugli S, Hofle O, Muller T, Strik W, Walther S (2011) Measuring motor activity in major depression: the association between the Hamilton depression rating Scale and actigraphy. Psychiatry Res 190:212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grap MJ, Hamilton VA, McNallen A, Ketchum JM, Best AM, Arief NY, Wetzel PA (2011) Actigraphy: analyzing patient movement. Heart Lung 40:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mistraletti G, Taverna M, Sabbatini G, Carloni E, Bolgiaghi L, Pirrone M, Cigada M, Destrebecq AL, Carli F, Iapichino G (2009) Actigraphic monitoring in critically ill patients: preliminary results toward an “observation-guided sedation”. J Crit Care 24:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michelle NB, Mark B, Jennifer D, Darren G, Chris JK, Emily G, David CM (2011) Harnessing context sensing to develop a mobile intervention for depression. J Med Int Res 13(3):e55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jelinek F (1997) Statistical methods for speech recognition. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York, pp 134–150Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mi-Hwa Song
    • 1
  • Jae-Sung Noh
    • 2
  • Seung-Min Yoo
    • 2
  • Young-Ho Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.U-Healthcare InstituteGachon UniversityYeonsu-GuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of MedicineAjou UniversityYeoungtong-guSouth Korea
  3. 3.IT DepartmentGachon UniversityYeonsu-GuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations