Skip to main content

A Starting Point: Understanding Governance, Good Governance and Water Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 54))

Abstract

Governance has been a widely and deeply discussed concept in the political sciences. As global freshwater resources have become increasingly degraded and impacts of climate change begin to take hold on local hydrological systems, scholars and practitioners have increasingly recognised a crisis of governance. This chapter presents a broad overview of governance theories and discusses the shifts from state centric notions of ‘government’ to a wider range of governance modes and types, as a way of contextualising the shift from a ‘command and control’ paradigm in water governance to more decentralised, integrated and flexible approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a definition of legitimacy see later discussion of good governance in Sect. 2.2.

  2. 2.

    Demsetz 1967, p 348: Externality is an ambiguous concept. For the purposes of this paper, the concept includes external costs, external benefits, and pecuniary as well as non-pecuniary externalities. No harmful or beneficial effect is external to the world. Some person or persons always suffer or enjoy these effects. That converts a harmful or beneficial effect into an externality is that the cost of bringing the effect to bear on the decisions of one or more of the interacting persons is too high to make it worthwhile, and this is what the term shall mean here. “Internalizing” such effects refers to a process, usually a change in property rights, that enables these effects to bear (in greater degree) on all interacting persons.

  3. 3.

    Refer to: http://www.gwpforum.org/servlet/PSP?iNodeID=1345

References

  • Allan A (2008) Governance assessment methodology. Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, University of Dundee, Dundee

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2003) Good governance in restructuring water supply: a handbook. Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and the Program on Water Issues (POWI), Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer CJ (1997) Bringing global markets down to earth: the political economy of water rights in Chile, 1976–95. World Dev 25(5):639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes FC, Folke C (2001) Back to the future: ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M, Dewulf A, Pahl-Wostl C, Taillieu T (2008) Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: about knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecol Soc 13(2): [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss32/art30/

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1967) Toward a theory of property rights. Am Econ Rev Pap & Proc 79th Ann Meet Am Econ Assoc 57(2):347–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL, Johns OR, Lemos MC, Nelson DR (2011) Integrated and adaptive management of water resources: tensions, legacies, and the next best thing. Ecol Soc 16(1):19. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss11/art19/

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Kolstad CD (2007) Moving to markets in environmental regulation: lessons from twenty years of experience. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote JR, Gbikpi B (2002) Participatory governance: political and societal implications. Leske + Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2000) Integrated water resouces management TAC background paper no. 4. GWP. Global Water Partnership – Technical Advisory Committee (GWP-TAC), Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2004) Integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency plans by 2005. TAC background papers no. 10. GWP. Global Water Partnership – Technical Advisory Committee (GWP-TAC), Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke G, Levitsky S (2004) Informal institutions and comparitive politics: a research agenda. Perspect Polit 2(4):740–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier A (2002) New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without legislating? In: Héritier A (ed) Common goods: reinventing European and international governance. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 185–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle E (2010a) South African water governance between administrative and hydrological boundaries. Clim Dev 2:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle E (2010b) The transformation towards adaptive water governance regimes in the context of climate change. Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unravelling the central state. But how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14(1):26. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss21/art26/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert M (2008) An analysis of trends related to the adaptation of water law to the challenge of climate change: experiences from Canada. Paper presented at the Climate 2008, Online, 3–7 Nov 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert M (2009) The adaptation of water law to climate change. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manage 1(3):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert M, Diaz H, Corkal DR (2008) Government, water governance and adaptive capacity in the South saskatchewan river basin. Institutional Adaptation to Climate Change Project, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schlüter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C, Nabide Kiti I (2011) Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environ Policy Gov 21:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISD (2006) Designing policies in a world of uncertainty, change and surprise: adaptive policy-making for agriculture and water resources in the face of climate change. International Development Research Centre & The Energy and Resources Institute, Winnipeg/Manitoba/New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram H (2011) Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach. In: Garrido A, Ingram H (eds) Water, food and sustainability. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A (2008) The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 26:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keman H (2006) The comparative approach: theory and method. In: Pennings P, Keman H, Kleinnijenhuis J (eds) Doing research in political science: an introduction to comparative methods and statistics, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane R, Ostrom E (1995) Local commons and global interdependence. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2008) The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. Penguin Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (1993) Modern governance: new government-society interactions. Sage, London/Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (2000) Societal governance: levels, modesl and orders of social-political interaction. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (2003) Governing as governance. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach D, Ingram H, Rayner S (2006) You never miss the water till the well runs dry: crisis and creativity in California. In: Clumsy solutions for a complex world, Verweij M, Thompson M (eds) Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. pp 226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas A, Anderson RL (1978) The desert shall rejoice: conflict, growth and justice in arid environments. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (2004) Governance im modernen Staat. In: Benz A (ed) Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 65–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (2006) Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In: Schuppert GF (ed) Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien. Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management. Ecol Soc 13(2):29. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss22/art29/

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R (2007) Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):15200–15205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrey DJ, Meinzen-Dick RS, Mollinga PP, Karar E (2007) Water for food, water for life. In: Molden D (ed) A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London, pp 193–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting RM (1981) Balancing on an Alp: ecological change and continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):419–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom V, Tiebout CH, Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am Polit Sci Rev 55:831–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21(1):49–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 19(3):354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre J (2000) Debating governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (2007) Understanding governance: ten years on. Org Stud 28:1243–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. GWP TAC background papers no. 7. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee, http://www.gwpforum.org/servlet/PSP?iNodeID=215&itemId=197

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanes M, Gonzalez-Villareal F (1999) The Dublin principles for water as reflected in a comparitive assessment of institutional and legal arrangement for integrated water resources management. Global Water Partnership: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/80638/IWRM4%5FTEC03%2DDublinPrinciples%2DSolanes%26Gonzales.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2008

  • Thobani M (1995) Tradable property rights to water: how to improve water use and resolve the water conflicts, Finance & private sector development note no. 34. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G, Frnaces J, Levacic R, Mitchel J (1991) Markets, hierarchies and networks: the co-ordination of social life. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib O, Bähr H, Falkner G (2007) Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. J Eur Public Policy 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1997) Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme [Online]. http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy/

  • Valdes JG (1995) Pinochet’s economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile (Historical perspectives on modern economics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • WB (2002) Toward more operationally relevant indicators of governance. Prem notes no 49, Dec 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Young O (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margot Hill .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, M. (2013). A Starting Point: Understanding Governance, Good Governance and Water Governance. In: Climate Change and Water Governance. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5796-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics