Coping with and Communicating Uncertainty

Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 54)


Understanding and communicating uncertain and complex dynamics is one of the biggest challenges to mobilising action in the face of climate change as well as a wide range of other environmental issues. This short chapter provides some reflections that draw on a wide range of different disciplines as to how to potential communicate uncertainties. It is suggested that applying a diverse range of insights on motivating action in the face of complex science and uncertain futures could enhance the cohesiveness of cross-sector action and ingenuity of the approaches to climate change adaptation at the watershed level.


Inter-disciplinary approaches to managing uncertainty Communicating uncertainty Behavioural economics Scientific complexity Climate change adaptation 


  1. Akerlof K, Rowan KE, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY (2012) Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science. Nat Clim Chang. Advance online publication.
  2. Balint PJ, Stewardt RE, Desai A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner RD (1996) Policy and global change research: a modest proposal. Clim Chang 32(2):121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crompton T (2008) Weathercocks and signposts: the environment movement at a crossroads. World Wildlife Fund, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawnay E, Shah H (2005) Extending the “rational man” model of human behaviour: seven key principles. Briefing note for the Environment Agency by NEF. New Economics Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Engle NL (2010) Adaptation to extreme droughts in Arizona, Georgia, and South Carolina: evaluating adaptive capacity and innovative planning and management approaches for states and their community water systems. University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  7. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440Google Scholar
  8. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey BS, Benz M, Stutzer A (2004) Introducing procedural utility: not only what, but also how matters. J Inst Theor Econ 160:377–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point. Little, Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schlüter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C, Nabide Kiti I (2011) Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environmen Policy Gov 21:145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iza A, Stein R (2009) RULE – reforming water governance. IUCN, GlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson T (2005) Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Centre for Environmental Strategy. University of Surrey, Guildford, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5(1):193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane SM, Yohe GW (2000) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change: an introduction. Clim Chang 45(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan S (2000) Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keeney RL, McDaniels TL (2001) A framework to guide thinking and analysis regarding climate change policies. Risk Anal 21:989–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Mullainathan S, Thaler R (2001) Behavioral economics. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York.Google Scholar
  20. Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the commons: the economics of climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):419–422Google Scholar
  22. Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007a) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(5):5 [online]. URL: Google Scholar
  23. Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) (2007b) Adaptive and integrated water management. Coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearce D (2002) The role of ‘Property Rights’ in determining economic values for environmental costs and benefits. Report to the Environment Agency, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Pomykala J (2005) Behavioural economics: a crash course.
  26. Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 36(1):11–46Google Scholar
  27. Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts NC (2000) Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. Int Public Manag Rev 1(1)Google Scholar
  29. Smit B, Burton I, Klein R, Wandel J (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim Chang 45:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutherland R (2011) The new sweet spot – and how to find it. Paper presented at the TEDx WWF, Geneva, Switzerland, 13 Oct 2011Google Scholar
  31. Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2005) Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. UNECE (2009) Guidance on water and adaptation to climate change. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Wales A (2011) The water-food-energy nexus – why everything you consume is connected. Paper presented at the TEDx WWF, Geneva, Switzerland, 13 Oct 2011Google Scholar
  34. Wheatley M, Frieze D (2006) Using emergence to take social innovation to scale. Berkana Institute, Spokane, WAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group on Climate Change and Climate Impacts Institute for Environmental SciencesUniversity of GenevaCarougeSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations