The Demand for Fertilizer When Markets Are Incomplete: Evidence from Ethiopia

Chapter

Abstract

The under-utilization of fertilizers is viewed as a hurdle to the adoption of more productive and sustainable agricultural techniques in sub-Saharan Africa. In this chapter, we investigate the role incomplete markets play in determining the use of chemical fertilizers among Ethiopian farmers with the aim of identifying policies that would encourage the adoption of profitable and sustainable agricultural practices. The results of regression analysis show that high transport costs, illiteracy, adverse local climates, and limitation in risk and credit markets are major constraints on the functioning of fertilizer markets, suggesting that government actions to close knowledge gaps and lower transportation costs can increase fertilizer use among farmers.

Keywords

Green Revolution Chemical fertilizer Organic fertilizer Soil fertility Incomplete markets Credit markets Insurance markets 

References

  1. Africa Union (2006) Abuja declaration on fertilizer for the African Green Revolution. Paper presented at the Africa fertilizer summit, Abuja, 13 June 2006Google Scholar
  2. Ahn J (2004) Panel data sample selection model: an application to employee choice of health plan type and medical cost estimation. Paper presented at econometric society 2004 far eastern meetings, Econometric SocietyGoogle Scholar
  3. Alem Y, Bezabib M, Kassie M, Zikhali P (2010) Does fertilizer use respond to rainfall variability? Panel data evidence from Ethiopia. Agric Econ 41(2):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacha D, Aboma G, Gemeda A, Groote HD (2001) The determinants of fertilizer and manure use in maize production in Western Oromiya, Ethiopia. In: Friesen DK, Palmer AFE (eds) Proceedings of the seventh Eastern and Southern Africa regional maize conference. CIMMYT, Nairobi KenyaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekele T, Höfner W (1993) Effects of different phosphate fertilizers on yield of barley and rape seed on reddish brown soils of the Ethiopian highlands. Fertilizer Res 34(3):243–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byerlee D, Spielman DJ, Alemu D, Gautam M (2007) Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: a review of evidences, vol 00707, Discussion paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Croppenstedt A, Demeke M (2003) Technology adoption in the presence of constraints: the case of fertilizer demand in Ethiopia. Rev Dev Econ 7(1):58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CSA (2008) Agricultural sample survey 2007/2008: farm management practices, vol 3. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  9. de Janvry A, Fafchamps M, Sadoulet E (1991) Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Econ J 101(409):1400–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demeke M, Kelly V, Jayne TS, Said A, Vallee JCL, Chen H (1998) Agricultural market performance and determinants of fertilizer use in Ethiopia, vol 10, Grain market research project working paper. Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dercon S (1996) Risk, crop choice, and savings: evidence from Tanzania. Econ Dev Cult Change 44(3):485–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dercon S, Christiaensen L (2007) Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: evidence from Ethiopia, vol 265, CSAE working paper series. Centre for the Study of African Economies, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Development Studies Associates (DSA) (2006) Study on improving the efficiency of input market, vol 1. Development Studies Association, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan N, Manning W, Morris C, Newhouse J (1984) Choosing between the sample selection model and the multi-part model. J Bus Econ Stat 2(3):283–289Google Scholar
  15. Fafchamps M, Quisumbing AR (1999) Human capital, productivity, and labor allocation in rural Pakistan. J Hum Res 34(2):369–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feder G, Umali DL (1993) The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 43(3 and 4):215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Change 33(2):255–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fufa B, Hassan R (2006) Determinants of fertilizer use on maize in eastern Ethiopia: a weighted endogenous sampling analysis of the extent and intensity of adoption. Agrekon 45(1):38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene WH (2007) Limdep version 9.0 econometric modeling guide. Econometric Software, BellportGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory DI, Bumb BL (2006) Factors affecting supply of fertilizer in Sub-Saharan Africa, ARD Working Paper 24, Discussion paper. Agricultural and Rural Development, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Heisey PW, Norton G (2007) Fertilizers and other farm chemicals. In: Evenson RE, Pingali PL (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, vol 3. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Henao J, Baanante C (2006) Agricultural production and soil nutrient mining in Africa: implications for resource conservation and policy development. Background paper for African fertilizer summit, AbjaGoogle Scholar
  23. Honore BE, Kyriazidou E (2000) Panel data discrete choice models with lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 68(4):839–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howard J, Crawford E, Kelly V, Demeke M, Jeje JJ (2003) Promoting high-input maize technologies in Africa: the Sasakawa-Global 2000 experience in Ethiopia and Mozambique. Food Policy 28(4):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayne TS, Govereh J, Wanzala M, Demeke M (2003) Fertilizer market development: a comparative analysis of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Zambia. Food Policy 28(4):293–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jayne TS, Yamano T, Nyoro J (2004) Interlinked credit and farm intensification: evidence from Kenya. Agric Econ 31(2 and 3):209–218Google Scholar
  27. Kyriazidou E (1997) Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica 65(6):1335–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson DF, Plessmann F (2009) Do farmers choose to be inefficient? Evidence from bicol. J Dev Econ 90(1):24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larson DF, Anderson JR, Varangis P (2004) Policies on managing risk in agricultural markets. World Bank Res Obs 19(2):199–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marenya PP, Barrett CB (2009) Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya. Agric Econ 40(5):561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsumoto T, Yamano T (2009) Soil fertility, fertilizer, and the maize Green Revolution in East Africa, vol 5158, World Bank policy research paper. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Mezgebo T (2005) Structure, conduct and performance of fertilizer marketing industry of Ethiopia, Draft paper. Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell TD, Hulme M, New M (2002) Climate data for political areas. Area 34(1):109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris ML, Kelly VA, Kopicki RJ, Byerlee D (2007) Promoting increased fertilizer use in Africa: lessons learned and good practice guidelines. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Nkonya E, Schroeder T, Norman D (1997) Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seed and fertilizer in Northern Tanzania. J Agric Econ 48(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otsuka K, Estudillo JP, Sawada Y (2009) Rural poverty and income dynamics in Asia and Africa. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pitt MM, Sumodiningrat G (1991) Risk, schooling and the choice of seed technology in developing countries: a meta-profit function approach. Int Econ Rev 32(2):457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sachs J, Mcarthur J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kruk M, Bahadur C, Faye M, Mccord G (2004) Ending Africa’s poverty trap. In: Brainard WC, Perry GL (eds) Brookings papers on economic activity 1. Brookings, Washington, DC, Spring 2004Google Scholar
  39. Skees J, Varangis P, Larson DF, Siegel P (2005) Can financial markets be trapped to help poor people cope with weather risks? In: Dercon S (ed) Insurance against poverty. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Verbeek M (1990) On the estimation of a fixed effects model with selectivity bias. Econ Lett 34(3):267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verbeek M, Nijman T (1992) Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. Int Econ Rev 33(3):681–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2006) National fertilizer sector project: implementation completion report. World Bank, Africa Region, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Wubeneh NG, Sanders JH (2006) Farm-level adoption of sorghum technologies in Tigray, Ethiopia. Agric Syst 91(1 and 2):122–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu Z, Guan Z, Jayne TS, Black R (2009) Factors influencing the profitability of fertilizer use on maize in Zambia. Agric Econ 40(4):437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zabel JE (1992) Estimating fixed and random effects models with selectivity. Econ Lett 40(3):269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Development BankTunis-BelvedèreTunisia
  2. 2.Development Research GroupWorld BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations