• Elizabeth Brandon


This chapter introduces the subject of site contamination, firstly in the broader context of environmental law and then in its own right. It traces the development of environmental law over time, and the more recent emergence of, and responses to, the site contamination issue. The reasons for particular legislative approaches to the issue, and how these have developed over the past few decades, are briefly discussed. This chapter considers the terminology of site contamination, and how it can be distinguished from similar and/or closely related issues such as soil pollution and brownfields.


Groundwater Contamination Town Planning Site Remediation Site Contamination Canal Incident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bates GM (2010) Environmental law in Australia, 7th edn. LexisNexis Butterworths, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd J (1999) Environmental remediation law and economies in transition. Discussion paper no. 99–21. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Christie S, Teeuw RM (1998) Varied policy of European Union states on contaminated land. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18:175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collin RW (2006) The Environmental Protection Agency: Cleaning up America’s act. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  5. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE) (2010) A decade of change for UK’s land use: economic growth through sustainable regeneration, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Government of the United Kingdom (2008) Guidance on the legal definition of contaminated land, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. de Roo G (2003) Environmental planning in the Netherlands: too good to be true – from command-and-control planning to shared governance. Ashgate Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions: towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. COM (2002) 179Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2006) Proposal for a directive establishing a framework for the protection of soil. COM (2006) 232 finalGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (Environment Directorate-General) (2003) Specific mandates. 1st meeting of the Advisory Forum on the Soil Thematic Strategy. Brussels, 23 April 2003Google Scholar
  11. Fletcher TH (2003) From Love Canal to environmental justice: the politics of hazardous waste on the Canada-U.S. border. Broadview Press, Peterborough, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler R (2007) Site contamination law and policy in Europe, North America and Australia – trends and challenges. Paper presented to the 8th Meeting of the International Committee on Contaminated Land, Stockholm, 10–11 September 2007Google Scholar
  13. Hassan D (2006) Protecting the marine environment from land-based sources of pollution. Ashgate Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  14. Houghton PD, Charman PEV (1986) Glossary of terms used in soil conservation. Soil Conservation Service, BathurstGoogle Scholar
  15. Huber S (2007) National activities on soil in Austria. Presented at the Eionet Workshop on Soil, Brussels, 18 September 2007Google Scholar
  16. Landcare Research (New Zealand) (2007) What is a contaminated site?. Available at
  17. Lewis J (1985) The birth of the EPA. United States Environment Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin Heng L, Manguiat MSZ (eds) (2003) Towards a “second generation” in environmental laws in the Asian and Pacific region: select trends. IUCN Environmental law and policy paper no. 48. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of NatureGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucas AR, Tilleman WA, Hughes EL (eds) (2003) Environmental law and policy, 3rd edn. Emond Montgomery, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. National Environment Protection Council (Australia) (1999) National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measureGoogle Scholar
  21. Robinson NA (2003) Challenges confronting the progressive development of a second generation of environmental laws. In: Lin Heng L, Manguiat MSZ (eds) Towards a “second generation” in environmental laws in the Asian and Pacific region: select trends. IUCN Environmental law and policy paper no. 48. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, pp 27–32Google Scholar
  22. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (UK) (1972) Pollution in some British estuaries and coastal waters – third report. Cmnd 5054Google Scholar
  23. Schamann M (1997) Contaminated sites in Austria. Federal Environment Agency (Austria)Google Scholar
  24. Shoebridge L (1993) When science meets law: contractual aspects of contaminated site cleanups. In: Rowe GC, Seidler S (eds) Contaminated sites in Australia: challenges for law and public policy. Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, pp 87–94Google Scholar
  25. Switzer CS, Bulan LA (2002) CERCLA: comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability act (Superfund). American Bar Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Waite A (2005) The quest for environmental law equilibrium. Environ Law Rev 7:34–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Webster’s Reference Library (2009) English Dictionary, Conciseth edn. Geddes & Grosset, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilkinson D (1994) Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather plc: diluting liability for continuing escapes. Modern Law Rev 57:799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. World Bank (2005) Towards a more effective operational response: arsenic contamination of groundwater in South and East Asian countries. World Bank Policy report no. 31303, vol 1Google Scholar


  1. Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather plc (1994) 1 All ER 53Google Scholar
  2. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 ILM 162Google Scholar

Other Legal Materials

  1. Bill of Sewers 1531, 23 Hen 8, c 5 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  2. Clean Air Act 1956, 4 & 5 Eliz 2, c 52 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  3. Directive 2006/118/EC on the Protection of Groundwater against Pollution and Deterioration [2006] OJ L 372/19 (European Union)Google Scholar
  4. Environment Act (1995) c 25 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  5. Environmental Protection Act (1990) c 43, Part 2A (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  6. Environmental Protection Act (1974) (Denmark)Google Scholar
  7. Federal Act on the Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Altlastensanierungsgesetz) (1989) (Austria)Google Scholar
  8. Housing and Town Planning Act (1909) 9 Edw 7, c 44 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  9. Housing and Town Planning Act (1919) (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  10. National Environmental Policy Act (1969) Pub. L. No. 91–190, 42 USC 4321–4347 (United States)Google Scholar
  11. Nuisances in Towns Act (1388) 12 Ric 2, c 13 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  12. Public Health Act (1875) 38 & 39 Vict, c 55 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  13. Public Health Act (1936) 26 Geo 5, c 49 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  14. Rivers (Prevention of Pollution) Act (1876) 39 & 40 Vict, c 75 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  15. Soil Remediation Guideline (Leidraad Bodemsanering) (1983) (The Netherlands)Google Scholar
  16. Town and Country Planning Act (1932) Geo 5, c 48 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  17. Town and Country Planning Act (1947) 10 & 11 Geo VI, c 51 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar
  18. Town and Country Planning Act (1990) Eliz 2, c 8 (United Kingdom)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TanundaAustralia

Personalised recommendations