Innovation in Disaster Mitigation Technologies

Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 25)

Abstract

In recent years geologically related hazards or disasters are happening more frequently and are more severe than before. We are thus in urgent need to enhance our disaster mitigation and rehabilitation capabilities by developing more innovative solutions. In this paper, the areas in which innovation may play a role are identified. A few examples are given to illustrate how innovative ideas can be adopted to develop new methods or improve the existing technologies to deal with natural disasters. These include (1) the use of geotextile mats to construct dikes; (2) the use of biogas technology to reduce liquefaction potential of sand; (3) the use of bioclogging technology to reduce riverbank or coastal erosion or make temporary water ponds on a beach or in the desert; (4) the use of quick setting materials, and (5) the use of quick construction technologies.

Keywords

Pore Water Pressure Stone Column Excess Pore Water Pressure Shake Table Test Liquefaction Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The contributions of V. Ivanov, V. Stabnikov, H. Jia, W. Guo, and N.H. Cao to the research projects presented are greatly acknowledged.

References

  1. Chu J, Varaksin S, Klotz U, Menge P (2009) Construction processes, State-of-the-art report. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, 5–9 Oct, vol 4, pp 3006–3135Google Scholar
  2. Chu J, Stabnilov V, Ivanov V (2012) Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation on surface or in the bulk of soil. Geomicrobiol J 29:544–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guo W, Chu J, Yan SW (2009) Classification of geotubes and related analysis methods. In: Leung CF, Chu J, Shen RF (eds) Ground improvement technologies and case histories. Research Publishing, Singapore, pp 263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. He J (2012) Mitigation of liquefaction of sand using microbial methods. Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technological University, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee EC (2009) Application of geotextile tubes as submerged dykes for long term shoreline management in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of 17th South East Asian geotechnical conference, Taipei, 10–13 MayGoogle Scholar
  6. Okamura M, Ishihara M, Tamura K (2006) Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132(2):258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Saathoff F, Oumeraci H, Restall S (2007) Australian and German experiences on the use of geotextile containers. Geotext Geomembr 25(4–5):251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yan SW, Chu J (2010) Construction of an offshore dike using slurry filled geotextile mats. Geotext Geomembr 28:422–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Yan SW, Chu J, Fan QJ, Yan Y (2009) Construction of offshore breakwater on soft clay using prefabricated caissons. In: Proceeding of ICE geotechnical engineering, London, 2009, vol 162, GE1, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  10. Yegian MK, Eseller-Bayat E, Alshawabkeh A, Ali S (2007) Induced-partial saturation for liquefaction mitigation: experimental investigation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133(4):372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations