Advertisement

Connecting Environmental Justice, Sustainability, and Vulnerability

  • Christopher G. BooneEmail author
  • Michail Fragkias
Chapter
Part of the Human-Environment Interactions book series (HUEN, volume 3)

Abstract

Justice is a core yet often ignored principle of sustainability. However, sustainability for some at the expense of others undermines the principles and practice of sustainability as a force for positive change. In this chapter, we argue that sustainability research and practice can benefit from a closer reading of environmental justice scholarship. At the same time, environmental justice can draw on sustainability principles of systems thinking, anticipatory action, and environmental stewardship to strengthen its methods and approaches while broadening its constituency. Vulnerability science can bridge environmental justice and sustainability and can also benefit from the convergence of ideas, principles, and practices of these fields.

Keywords

Systems thinking Anticipatory action Environmental stewardship Procedural justice Distributive justice 

References

  1. Adger, W. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolin, B. (2006). Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 113–129). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchmann, C. (2009). Cuban home gardens and their role in social–ecological resilience. Human Ecology, 37(6), 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. City of New York. (2011). PlaNYC: A greener, greater New York. http://nytelecom.vo.llnwd.net/o15/agencies/planyc2030/pdf/planyc_2011_planyc_full_report.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2012.
  6. Claudio, L. (2007). Standing on principle: The global push for environmental justice. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(10), A500–A503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cumming, A., Twardus, D., & Nowak, D. (2008). Urban forest health monitoring: Large-scale assessments in the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 34(6), 341–346.Google Scholar
  8. Cutter, S. (2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donovan, G. H., & Butry, D. T. (2010). Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape & Urban Planning, 94(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eakin, H., & Luers, A. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social–environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot, R. (1997). Faking nature: The ethics of environmental restoration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. (1986). United States Code Title 42, Chapter 116. Online: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-116
  13. Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grineski, S., Bolin, B., & Boone, C. G. (2007). Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations: Environmental inequity in Metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Janssen, M., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A crosscutting theme of the international human dimensions programme on global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16, 237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2007). Racial inequality in the distribution of hazardous waste: A national-level reassessment. Social Problems, 54(3), 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Okereke, C. (2008). Global justice and neoliberal environmental governance: Ethics, sustainable development and international co-operation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Omer, I., & Or, U. (2005). Distributive environmental justice in the city: Differential access in two mixed Israeli cities. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 96(4), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pellow, D. (2007). Resisting global toxics: Transnational movements for environmental justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pickett, S. T. A., Boone, C. G., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2007). Relationships of environmental justice to ecological theory. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 88(2), 166–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pincetl, S. (2010). From the sanitary city to the sustainable city: Challenges to institutionalising biogenic (nature’s services) infrastructure. Local Environment, 15(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, J., Burch, S., Talwar, S., O’Shea, M., & Walsh, M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 756–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rolston III, H. (2003). Value in nature and the nature of value. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics: An anthology (pp. 143–153). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Rosan, C. D. (2011). Can PlaNYC make New York City ‘greener and greater’ for everyone?: Sustainability planning and the promise of environmental justice. Local Environment. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.627322.
  27. Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W., Hammer, S. A., & Shagun Mehrotra, S. (2010). Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature, 467(7318), 909–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Hasse, D., Langake, T., Marcotullio, P., Munroe, D. K., Branislav, O., & Simon, D. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117622109.
  30. Singh, R. J., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, T., Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Pellow, D. N. (2006). Challenging the chip: Labor rights and environmental justice in the global electronics industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.Google Scholar
  34. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, E., Kahhat, R., Allenby, B., Kavazanjian, E., Kim, J., & Xu, M. (2008). Environmental, social, and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(17), 6446–6454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xing, G. H., Chan, J. K. Y., & Leung, A. O. W. (2009). Environmental impact and human exposure to PCBs in Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling site in China. Environment International, 35(1), 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations