Advertisement

Natural Law: Autonomous or Heteronomous? The Thomistic Perspective

  • Diego PooleEmail author
Chapter
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 22)

Abstract

According to Aquinas, human creatures participate in the eternal law in two different ways: as a mere material inclination stamped in nature (the improper concept of law), and as a formal participation, as imperative towards an end, constituted by human reason (the proper sense of law, insofar as it only exists in rational creatures). According to this second sense, human reason is regulatory and prescriptive, the creative source of law, in an analogous way as divine wisdom is. Natural law consists properly in this participation of human reason in the divine reason; in that it manifests itself in such a way that, in a similar manner to divine reason and cooperating with it, human reason is able to contribute to the ordering of everything —of oneself first of all— towards its end. In this ordering task, man’s reason and appetitive power interact, being perfected by moral virtue.

Keywords

Human Reason Formal Participation Rational Appetite Moral Precept Social Doctrine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1993. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Citta del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  2. Di Blasi, F. 2006. Law as ‘Act of Reason’ and ‘Command’. Nova et Vetera (English Ed.) 4(2): 515–528.Google Scholar
  3. Finnis, J. 1996. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. González, A.M. 2006. Claves de la ley natural. Pamplona: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  5. Grisez, G. 1965. The first principle of practical reason. A commentary on the summa theologie. 1–2, Question 94, Article 2, Natural Law Forum 4.Google Scholar
  6. Hittinger, R. 1987. A critique of the new natural law theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hittinger, R. 2003. The first grace: Rediscovering the natural law in a post-christian world. Wilmington (De): ISI Books.Google Scholar
  8. Kelsen, H. 1949. Teoría general del Derecho y del Estado. México D.F: UNAM.Google Scholar
  9. Levering, M. 2006. Natural law and natural inclination. The Thomist 70: 155–201.Google Scholar
  10. Long, S. A. 2006. Providence, freedom, and natural law. Nova et Vetera (English Ed.) 4(3): 557–605.Google Scholar
  11. Millán Puelles, A. 1994. La libre afirmación de nuestro ser. Madrid: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  12. Rhonheimer, M. 2000. Ley natural y razón práctica. Pamplona: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  13. Rhonheimer, M. 2002. La legge morale naturale: conoscenza morale e coscienza. Ars Interpretandi 7: 47–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Filosofía del DerechoUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations