Advertisement

Subsidy, Revenue and Tragedies in Heterogeneous Communities

  • Mbuyu Sumbwanyambe
  • Andre L. Nel
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 186)

Abstract

Developing countries have embarked on the promotion of “ICT access for all” through subsidized Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), especially in underserviced areas of such countries. The main aim of the “ICT access for all” is to extend the communication services to the large areas of underserviced regions through subsidized communication services. In some instances, subsidies may lead to high ICT penetration and high resource utilization while in some instances unsubsidized services may lead to low utilization of resources and low ICT penetration, which may eventually lead to market failure and destroy market efficiency. With explicitly defined objectives, regarding subsidy policy, however, developing countries always fall short on the implementation of such subsidy policy due to economic reasons and unrealistic subsidy driven pricing models. In this paper we investigate the impact of subsidy driven pricing model on resource utilization and revenue maximization in a developing country. We try to find a middle ground between promoting “ICT access for all” (given a subsidy and diverse income variations between the groups) and resource utilization in a network.

Keywords

Heterogeneous communities ICTs Pricing developing country Revenue Subsidy Tragedy of the commons Tragedy of the anti-commons 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the University of Johannesburg commonwealth bursary fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Sumbwanyambe M, Nel AL (2012) Subsidy and revenue maximization in developing countries. In: International multiconference of engineers and computer scientist, IMECS 2012. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science. Hong Kong, 14–16 March, pp 1568–1573Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jagannathan S, Almeroth KC (2002) Prices issues in delivering E-content on-demand. ACM Sigecom Exch 3(2):19–26Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levin SL (2010) Universal service and targeted support in a competitive telecommunication environment. Telecommun Policy J 34:92–97Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mariscal J (2005) Digital divide in a developing country. Telecommun Policy J 29(5–6):406–428Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garbacz C, Thompson HG (2005) Universal telecommunication service: a world perspective. Inf Econ Policy 17:495–512Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sumbwanyambe M, Nel AL, Clarke WA (2011) Challenges and proposed solutions towards telecentre sustainability: a Southern Africa case study. In: Proceedings of IST-Africa 2011 Gaborone Botswana 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TIBA (2012) South Africa’s universal service agency to offer big players subsidy to take voice and data to most rural areas”, Feb 2012. http://www.balancingact-africa.com/news/en/issue-no-398/telecoms/south-africa-s-unive/en
  8. 8.
    M. Sumbwanyambe, A. L Nel, W.A. Clarke “Optimal pricing of telecomm services in a developing country: A game theoretical approach” in proceedings of AFRICON 2011 pages 1–6 Livingstone, ZambiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garbacz C, Thompson HG (2007) Demand for telecommunication services in developing countries. Telecommun Policy 31:276–289Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramos B, Saeed K, Pavlov O (2010) The impact of universal service obligations and international cross-subsidies on the dispersion of telephone services in developing countries. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 44:57–72Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heller MA (1997) The tragedy of the anti-commons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. In: Proceedings of Harvard Law Review, vol 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harding G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. J Sci 168:1246–1248Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandjes M (2003) Pricing strategies under heterogeneous service requirements. In: Proceedings of 22nd IEEE Computer and Communications (INFOCOM)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering ScienceUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations