Gender Differences of Human Response Under Vibration Condition

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 186)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the gender differences of human response under different vibration frequencies. A total of nine frequencies (1.6, 2.0, 2.5, 3.15, 4.0, 5.0, 6.3, 8.0 and 10.0 Hz) were chosen as stimuli for testing in the experiment. In this experiment, four tests were conducted: Heart Rate Variety (HRV) Test, Posture test, Visual Reaction Test and Auditory Reaction Test. Ten males and ten females were invited to participate in the experiment. The major findings revealed that (i) there is difference in response of the feeling of discomfort for tensed upper body posture between males and females. However, (ii) there are no significant differences between males and females in visual and auditory tests. (iii) Vibration influenced our heart rate, it seems more serious on males than females as the heart rate of some female participants do not increase.

Keywords

Auditory reaction test Gender difference Heart rate variety test Posture test Vibration Visual reaction test 

References

  1. 1.
    Yau HK, Luk BL, Chan SS (2012) Evaluation of human response under vibration condition. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science, In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists,IMECS 2102, 14–16 March 2012, Hong Kong, pp 1439–1442Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mcleod RW, Griffin MJ (1995) Mechanical vibration included interference with manual control performance. Ergonomics 38:1431–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu JZ, Kubo M, Aoki H (1995) A study on the difference of human sensation evaluation to whole body vibration in sitting and lying postures. Appl Hum Sci 14:219–226Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byung CM, Soon CC, Se JP (2002) Automatic responses of young passengers contingent to the speed and driving model of a vehicle. Int J Ind Ergon 29:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subashia GHMJ, Nawaysehb N, Matsumotoa Y, Griffinc MJ (2008) Nonlinear subjective and dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to horizontal whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib 321:416–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mester J, Spitzenpfeil P, Yue ZY (2003) Vibration loads: potential for strength and power development In: Komi P.V. (ed) In strength and power in sport. Blackwell Publishing Company, Oxford, pp. 488−501.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nawayseh N, Griffin MJ (2002) Non-linear dual-axis biodynamic response to vertical whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib 268:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsumoto Y, Griffin MJ (2002) Non-linear characteristics in the dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. J Biomech Eng 124:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang Y, Griffin MJ (2006) Effect of voluntary periodic muscular activity on nonlinearity in the apparent mass of the seated human body during vertical random whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib 298:824–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brebner JT, Welford AT (1980) Introduction: an historical background sketch. In: Welford AT (ed) Reaction times. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Fieandt K , Huhtala A, Kullberg P, Saarl K (1956) Personal tempo and phenomenal time at different age levels. The University of Helsinki Psychological Institute Report No. 2Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galton F (1899) On instruments for (1) testing perception of differences of tint and for (2) determining reaction time. J Anthropol Inst 19:27–29Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grether WF (1971) Vibration and human performance. Hum Factors 13(3):203–216Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welford AT (1977) Motor performance. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Van Nosttrand Reinhold, New York, pp 450–496Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubo M, Terauchi F, Aoki H (2001) An investigation into a synthetic vibration model for humans: an investigation into a mechanical vibration human model constructed according to the relations between the physical, psychological and physiological reactions of humans exposed to vibration. Int J Ind Ergon 27:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ullsperger P, Seidel H (1980) On auditory evoked potentials and heart rate in man during whole-body vibration. Eur J Appl Physiol 43:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kun J, Li Z, Chen M, Wang C, Qi S (2004) Effect of different vibration frequencies on heart rate variability and driving fatigue in healthy drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations