The Boys Carried the Piano Upstairs
This chapter suggests taking a new look at akrasia in group actions. The results of such an investigation contribute to a better understanding of what it means to act as a free agent in a group context and to an evaluation of non-intended consequences and outcomes of group actions.
The initial discussion of the single agent’s akratic action alone and in group contexts suggests to focus on the intentional stance of the agent, not on her self-evaluation or rationality constraints. The distinction between strong and weak cases of akrasia highlights how weak akrasia is a symptom of free agency.
This yields an interesting argument against the account of groups as single agents (vs. Pettit, and Hess in the proposed volume). In considering the possibility of akrasia for groups as quasi-single-agents, the result is negative: groups cannot act akratically. Their “actions” are bound by external force since they rely on intentionality derived from agents that initiate or maintain them, no matter what the present mental states of these agents might be. Yet, if groups are not free to act akratically, they cannot act at all, and hence are not proper agents.
KeywordsSingle Agent Group Agent Group Context Musical Piece Full Sense
- Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, Margret. 1989. On social facts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hess, Kendy. 2010. The modern corporation as moral agent: The capacity for ‘Thought’ and a ‘First-Person Perspective’. Southwest Philosophy Review 26(1): 61–69.Google Scholar
- Kobow, Beatrice. 2009. GM, Kommunikatives Verstehen und Gesellschaftlichkeit. In Handeln mit Bedeutung und Handeln mit Gewalt, ed. Christoph Lumer, Ulla Wessels, and Christoph Fehige, 155–173. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
- Kobow, Beatrice. 2011. The “Sound of Power”: Polyphony as a concept for a theory of action. Transposition – Musique et Sciences Sociales. http://transposition-revue.org/article/the-sound-of-power-investigating?lang=fr. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
- Meggle, Georg (ed.). 2002. Social facts & collective intentionality. Frankfurt am Main: Dr. Hänsel – Hohenhausen AG.Google Scholar
- Raz, Joseph. 1975. Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rovane, Carol. 1998. The bounds of agency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1992. Being and nothingness, translated and with an introduction by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, John R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, John R. 2001. Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, John R. 2010. Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1971. Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge.Google Scholar