Implications for Prevention and Intervention: A More Person-Centered Approach

  • Sherry HambyEmail author
  • John Grych
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)


One of the most important functions of any theoretical framework is to guide practice in the field. The accumulated data on co-occurrence provide strong evidence that prevention and intervention of all types of violence should be organized around the full context of individuals’ experiences, not narrowly defined subtypes of abuse or violence. The research discussed in previous chapters provides new urgency to calls to better integrate victim services. Additionally, services aimed at perpetrators or would-be perpetrators of particular violence types could be more effective if they address the fact that many perpetrators offend in multiple contexts and often have victimization histories. In this chapter, we discuss how recognizing the interrelations among different forms of violence can guide prevention, assessment, and intervention.


Intimate Partner Violence Domestic Violence Child Sexual Abuse Sexual Violence Child Protection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, L., & Whiston, S. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, B., Kerig, P. K., & Rosenbluth, B. (2009). “Like a family but better because you can actually trust each other”: The expect respect dating violence prevention program for at-risk youth. Health Promotion Practice, 10, 45S–58S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banyard, V. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., et al. (2011). The national intimate and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, S. (2010). Organizational stress as a barrier to trauma-informed service delivery. In M. Becker & B. Levin (Eds.), A public health perspective of women’s mental health (pp. 295–311). New York: Spring.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications for research and policy. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 8(3), 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2000). Improving substance abuse treatment: The national treatment plan initiative. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  8. Chaffee, R. B. (2007). Managed care and termination. In W. T. O’Donohue & M. Cucciare (Eds.), Terminating psychotherapy: A clinician’s guide (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chandrasekaran, C., & Hamby, S. (2010). Lifetime exposure to violence prevention programs in a college sample. Paper presented at the International Family Violence & Child Victimization Research Conference. Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, A. T. D., Yasui, M., & Kavanagh, K. (2007). An adaptive approach to family intervention: Linking engagement in family-centered intervention to reductions in adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coté, S., Vaillancourt, T., LeBlanc, J., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. (2006). The development of physical aggression from toddlerhood to pre-adolescence: A nationwide longitudinal study of Canadian children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Bellis, M. (2001). Developmental traumatology: The psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 537–561.Google Scholar
  13. DeBoer, K., Rowe, L., Frousakis, N., Dimidjian, S., & Christensen, A. (2012). Couples excluded from a therapy trial due to intimate partner violence: Subsequent treatment-seeking and occurrence of IPV. Psychology of Violence 2(1), 28–39.Google Scholar
  14. Dishion, T., & Stormshak, E. (2007). Intervening in children’s lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doss, B., Simpson, L., & Christensen, A. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 608–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. English, D. J., Edleson, J. L., & Herrick, M. E. (2005). Domestic violence in one state’s child protective caseload: A study of differential case dispositions and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1183–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Ormrod, R., & Hamby, S. L. (2005). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment, 10(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., Turner, H., & Holt, M. (2009). Pathways to poly-victimization. Child Maltreatment, 14(4), 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foshee, V., Linder, G., Bauman, K., Langwick, S., Arriaga, X., Heath, J., et al. (1996). The safe dates project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 39–47.Google Scholar
  22. Foshee, V., Bauman, K. E., Greene, W. F., Koch, G. G., Linder, G. F., & MacDougall, J. E. (2000). The safe dates program: 1-year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1619–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foshee, V., Bauman, K., Ennett, S., Suchindran, C., Benefield, T., & Linder, G. (2005). Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program “safe dates” using random coefficient regression modeling. Prevention Science, 6, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham-Bermann, S., Lynch, S., Banyard, V., DeVoe, E. R., & Halabu, H. (2007). Community-based intervention for children exposed to intimate partner violence: An efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham-Bermann, S., Sularz, A., & Howell, K. (2011). Additional adverse events among women exposed to intimate partner violence: Frequency and impact. Psychology of Violence, 1(2), 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamby, S., & Clark, S. (2011). Beyond rope ladders & padlocks: A new approach to safety planning. Paper presented at the Ending Domestic & Sexual Violence: Innovations in Practice & Research Conference, Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
  27. Hamby, S., Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., & Ormrod, R. (2010). The overlap of witnessing partner violence with child maltreatment and other victimizations in a nationally representative survey of youth. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, M., & Fallot, R. (2001). Using trauma theory to design service systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Jaffe, P. G., Sudermann, M., Reitzel, D., & Killip, S. M. (1992). An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence and Victims, 7(2), 129–146.Google Scholar
  30. Kazdin, A. E., & Blase, S. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lieberman, A. F., Van Horn, P., & Ippen, C. G. (2005). Toward evidence-based treatment: Child-parent psychotherapy with preschoolers exposed to marital violence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(12), 1241–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcus, L. J., Dorn, B. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness: A model to build government connectivity. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy. Practice, and Science, 4(2), 128–134. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.128.
  33. Mathews, B., & Kenny, M. C. (2008). Mandatory reporting legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences, and issues. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 50–63. doi: 10.1177/1077559507310613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McNamee, C., & Mulford, C. (2007). Innovations assessment of the elder abuse forensic center of orange county, California (NCJ 220331). Washington: National Institutes of Justice.Google Scholar
  35. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K., Seybolt, D., Morissey-Kane, E., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Center for Infants Toddlers & Families (2011). Zero to Three Retrieved December 20, 2011, from
  37. Noll, J. G., & Grych, J. H. (2011). Read-react-respond: An integrative model for understanding sexual revictimization. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. North Carolina Council for Women (2009). Statistical Bulletin 2007–2008 Retrieved from
  39. Nugent-Borakove, M. E., Fanflik, P., Troutman, D., Johnson, N., Burgess, A., & O’Connor, A. (2006). Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do they make a difference in sexual assault arrest & prosecution outcomes? (NCJRS No. 214252). Washington: National Institutes of Justice.Google Scholar
  40. Olds, D. (2006). The nurse–family partnership: An evidence-based preventive intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Potter, S. (2012). Using a multi-media social marketing campaign to increase active bystanders on the college campus Journal of American College Health., 60(4), 282–295.Google Scholar
  42. Potter, S., Moynihan, M. M., & Stapleton, J. G. (2011). Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(5), 971–990. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Repetti, R., Robles, T., & Reynolds, B. (2011). Allostatic processes in the family. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhodes, J. E. (2008). Improving youth mentoring programs through research-based practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sacks, S., & Ries, R. (2005). Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders (SMA 05–3922). Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  46. Schechter, S., & Edleson, J. L. (1999). Effective intervention in domestic violence and child maltreatment: Guidelines for policy and practice Reno. NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
  47. Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (Eds.). (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Sherman, L. (1992). Policing domestic violence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sirotkin, J. N., & Fecko, C. M. (2008). A case study in post-Nicholson litigation. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence Newsletter, 12,  .Google Scholar
  50. Stormshak, E., & Dishion, T. (2009). A school-based, family-centered intervention to prevent substance use: The family check-up. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, B., Stein, N., Woods, D., & Mumford, E. (2011). Shifting boundaries: Final report on an experimental evaluation of a youth dating violence prevention program in New York city middle schools (No 236175). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  52. Thornton, T., Craft, C., Dahlberg, L., Lynch, B., & Baer, K. (2002). Best practices of youth violence prevention: a sourcebook for community action (revised). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  53. Tierney, J. P., & Grossman, J. B. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of big brothers, big sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  54. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington: National Institutes of Justice.Google Scholar
  55. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington: National Institutes of Justice.Google Scholar
  56. Waller, M., & Patterson, S. (2002). Natural helping and resilience in a Diné (Navajo) community. Families in Society, 83(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
  57. Walsh, W. A., Cross, T. P., Jones, L. M., Simone, M., & Kolko, D. J. (2007). Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination?: The impact of children’s advocacy centers. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(10), 1053–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolfe, D., Crooks, C., Jaffe, P. G., Chiodo, D., Hughes, R., Ellis, W., et al. (2009). A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 163(8), 692–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySewanee, The University of the SouthSewaneeUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations