Advertisement

ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments

  • Henrique Lopes CardosoEmail author
  • Joana Urbano
  • Ana Paula Rocha
  • António J. M. Castro
  • Eugénio Oliveira
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 8)

Abstract

The ANTE framework encompasses results of research efforts on three main agreement technology concepts, namely negotiation, normative environments and computational trust. ANTE has been conceived as a general framework with a wide range of applications in mind. This chapter provides an overview of the main guidelines of this project, and explores two application domains for this framework: automated B2B electronic contracting, and disruption management in the context of an airline company operational control.

Keywords

Negotiation Process Normative Environment Negotiation Protocol Computational Trust Quantifiable Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), under project PTDC/EIA-EIA/104420/2008, and by QREN under project RESPLAN. The authors would also like to thank Pedro Brandão for his work on the implementation of the ANTE prototype.

References

  1. Bachmann, R. 2001. Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies 22(2): 341–369.Google Scholar
  2. Castelfranchi, C., and R. Falcone. 2010. Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model, Wiley Series in Agent Technology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Castro, A., and E. Oliveira. 2011. A new concept for disruption management in airline operations control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 3(3): 269–290. doi:10.1243/09544100JAERO864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen, J., A. Larsen, and J. Larsen. 2005. Disruption management in the airline industry – concepts, models and methods. Technical report, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU, Richard Petersens Plads, Building 321, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby. http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/p.php?3763.
  5. Craswell, R. 2000. Contract law: General theories. In Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. III, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Das, T.K., Teng, B. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23(3): 491–512.Google Scholar
  7. Dijkstra, E.W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ireland, R.D., and J.W. Webb. 2007. A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 25(2): 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonker, C.M., J. Treur. 1999. Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based on experiences. In MultiAgent system engineering, 9th European workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world, 221–231. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Josang, A., R. Ismail, C. Boyd. 2007. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43(2): 618–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaplow, L. 2000. General characteristics of rules. In: Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. Volume V: The economics of crime and litigation, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 502–528. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Kirkpatrick, S., C.Gelatt Jr, M. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598): 671–680.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kohl, N., A. Larsen, J. Larsen, A. Ross, S. Tiourline. 2004. Airline disruption management: Perspectives, experiences and outlook. Technical report CRTR-0407, Carmen Research.Google Scholar
  14. Lopes Cardoso, H. 2010. Electronic institutions with normative environments for agent-based e-contracting. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
  15. Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2008. Norm defeasibility in an institutional normative framework. In Proceedings of the 18th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2008), ed. M. Ghallab, C. Spyropoulos, N. Fakotakis, and N. Avouris, 468–472. Patras: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2009. A context-based institutional normative environment. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems IV, LNAI, vol. 5428, ed. J. Hubner, E. Matson, O. Boissier, V. Dignum, 140–155. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2010. Directed deadline obligations in agent-based business contracts. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems V, LNAI, vol. 6069, ed. J. Padget, A. Artikis, W. Vasconcelos, K. Stathis, V. Torres da Silva, E. Matson, A. Polleres pp. 225–240. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Luhmann, N. 1979 Trust and power. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.Google Scholar
  20. Quinlan, J.R. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1: 81–106.Google Scholar
  21. Rocha, A., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2005. Virtual enterprise integration: Technological and organizational perspectives, chap. Contributions to an electronic institution supporting virtual Enterprises’ life cycle, chapter XI, 229–246. Hershey: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  22. Sako, M. 1998. Does trust improve business performance? In Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications, ed. C. Lane and R. Bachmann. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2009. Computing confidence values: Does trust dynamics matter? In 14th Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence (EPIA 2009), LNAI, 520–531. Aveiro: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2010a. Making electronic contracting operational and trustworthy. In 12th Ibero-American conference on artificial intelligence. Bahia Blanca: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2010b. Trustworthiness tendency incremental extraction using information gain. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT), Toronto, vol. 2, pp. 411–414. doi:10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.151.Google Scholar
  26. Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011a. A situation-aware computational trust model for selecting partners. Transactions on computational collective intelligence V pp. 84–105. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011b. Trust-based selection of partners. In E-Commerce and web technologies, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol. 85, ed. C. Huemer, T. Setzer, W. Aalst, J. Mylopoulos, M. Rosemann, M.J. Shaw, and C. Szyperski, 221–232. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Urbano, J., LH. Lopes Cardoso, E. Oliveira, and A. Rocha. 2012a. Normative and trust-based systems as enabler technologies for automated negotiation. In Negotiation and argumentation in MAS, ed. F. Lopes and H. Coelho. Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah (United Arab Emirates).Google Scholar
  29. Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2012b. Trust and normative control in multi-agent systems: An empirical study. In 10th International conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (PAAMS 2012), Special sessio on trust, incentives and norms in open multi-agent systems (TINMAS). Salamanca: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Wathne, K.H., and J.B. Heide. 2000. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. The Journal of Marketing 64(4): 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrique Lopes Cardoso
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joana Urbano
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Rocha
    • 1
  • António J. M. Castro
    • 1
  • Eugénio Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.LIACC, Department of Engineering, Informática, Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations