Skip to main content

Synergistic Use of LOTOS-EUROS and NO2 Tropospheric Columns to Evaluate the NOX Emission Trends Over Europe

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII

Abstract

The NOx-emission trend has been evaluated over Europe using the LOTOS-EUROS model and the NO2 tropospheric columns from OMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boersma KF, Jacob DJ, Bucsela EJ, Perring AE, Dirksen R, van der A RJ, Yantosca RM, Park RJ, Wenig MO, Bertram TH, Cohen RC (2006) Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 observations during INTEX-B and application to constrain Nox emissions over the eastern United States and Mexico. Atmos Environ 42(19):4480–4497. doi:10.1026/j.atmosenv.2008.02.004, 2008. 4304, 4309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boersma KF, Jacob DJ, Trainic M, Rudich Y, DeSmedt I, Dirksen R, Eskes HJ (2009) Validation of urban NO2 concentrations and their diurnal and seasonal variations observed from space (SCIAMACHY and OMI sensors) using in situ measurements in Israeli cities. Atmos Chem Phys 9:3867–3879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huijnen V, Eskes HJ, Amstrup B, Bergstrom R, Boersma KF et al (2010) Comparison of OMI NO2 tropospheric columns with an ensemble of global and European regional air quality models. Atmos Chem Phys 10:3273–3296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Konovalov IB, Beekmann M, Burrows JP, Richter A (2008) Satellite measurement based estimates of decadal changes in European nitrogen oxides emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 5(8):2623–2641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuenen J, van der Gon D , Visschedijk AH, van de Brugh H, van Gijlswijk R (2011) MACC European emission inventory for the years 2003–2007. Technical Report. report TNO-060-UT-2011-00588. TNO, Utrecht, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schaap M, Renske MA, Timmermans MR, Boersen GAC, Builtjes PJH, Sauter FJ, Velders GJM, Beck JP (2007) The LOTOS–EUROS model: description, validation and latest developments. Int J Environ Pollut (IJEP) 32(2)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der A RJ, Peters DHMU, Eskes H, Boersma KF, Van Roozendael M, De Smedt I, Kelder HM (2006) Detection of the trend and seasonal variation in tropospheric NO2 over China. J Geophys Res 111:D12317. doi:10.1029/2005JD006594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van der A RJ et al (2008) Trends, seasonal variability and dominant NOx source derived from a ten year record of NO2 measured from space. J Geophys Res 113:D04302. doi:10.1029/2007JD009021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Brunner D, Hueglin C, Henne S, Staehelin J (2012) Changes in OMI tropospheric NO2 columns over Europe from 2004 to 2009 and the influence of meteorological variability. Atmos Environ 46:482–495. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper is supported by ENERGEO, a Collaborative Project (2009–2012) funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme and TNO internal funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyana Curier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Questions and Answers

Questioner Name: W. Lefebvre

Q: How does the changing NO2/NOx ratio affect your results?.

A: The downward trend observed in NOx emissions partly resulted in the development of new technologies that influence the ratio. Changes in NO2/NOX ratios during the period of interest may result in additional uncertainty in NOX emissions.

Questioner Name: J. Silver

Q: The comparison between OMI and LOTOS-EUROS showed a seasonal bias. Is this mainly due to the model or the observations?

A: Many studies shown this bias between chemistry transport model and observation. The discrepancies observed between the tropospheric OMI NO2 tropospheric column and its modelled counterparts should occur mainly in the higher part of the atmosphere due to a lack of sources such as lightning and incorrect estimates of the lifetime of NO2 at higher altitude. On the other hand, comparison studies between OMI and ground based observations have also shown that OMI was biased high.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Curier, L., Kranenburg, R., Timmermans, R., Segers, A., Eskes, H., Schaap, M. (2014). Synergistic Use of LOTOS-EUROS and NO2 Tropospheric Columns to Evaluate the NOX Emission Trends Over Europe. In: Steyn, D., Builtjes, P., Timmermans, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5577-2_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics