Skip to main content

Impact of Aerosol Activation on Modelled Regional Particulate Matter Mass and Size Distribution Due to Cloud Processing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Aerosol activation is a key process in aerosol-AQ cloud interaction. Although it is widely studied within the climate modeling community it has not been attracting significant attention within the air quality modeling community. In this study an off-line, sectional, chemically-speciated regional air quality model, AURAMS, has been used to assess the impact of aerosol activation on the modelled regional particulate matter (PM) mass concentration and size distribution. Asimple activation scheme based on an empirical relationship between cloud droplet number density and aerosol number density is compared to a more physically-based activation scheme. Model simulations were compared to aircraft observations obtained during the 2004 ICARTT field campaign. Modelled aerosol light extinction and column aerosol optical depth (AOD) were computed in three different ways in the current study. Two of them based on Mie calculations and one empirical reconstructed mass extinction method. The magnitude of the modeled AOD varies significantly depending on the approach. The impact of different aerosol activation schemes on the modelled AOD in this case is generally in the range of 20–30 % for the two Mie methods. As the empirical reconstructed mass extinction method is not size dependent, it is less sensitive to aerosol activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdul-Razzak H, Ghan SJ (2002) A parameterization of aerosol activation. Part 3: Sectional representation. J Geophys Res 107(D3). doi:10.1029/2001JD000483

  2. Binkowski FS, Roselle SJ (2003) Models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description. J Geophys Res 108(D6):4183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans BTN, Fournier GR (1990) Simple approximation to extinction efficiency valid over all size parameters. Appl Opt 29(31):4666–4670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fehsenfeld FC et al (2006) International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT): North America to Europe – overview of the 2004 summer field study. J Geophys Res 111(D23):D23S01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong W, Stroud C, Zhang L (2011) Cloud processing of gases and aerosols in air quality modeling. Atmosphere 2(4):567–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gong W et al (2006) Cloud processing of gases and aerosols in a regional air quality model (AURAMS). Atmos Res 82(1–2):248–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong W et al (2010) Comparative evaluation of model simulations of regional ozone and particulate matters for two distinct summers over eastern North America. In: Steyn DG, Trini Castelli S (eds) Air pollution modelling and its application XXI. Springer, Dordrecht, pp513–518

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayden KL et al (2008) Cloud processing of nitrate. J Geophys Res 113(D18):D18201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoose C et al (2010) Parameterization of in-cloud vertical velocities for cloud droplet activation in coarse-grid models: analysis of observations and cloud resolving model results. Paper presented at 13th AMS conference on atmospheric radiation, Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones A, Roberts DL, Slingo J (1994) A climate model study of indirect radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulphate aerosols. Nature 370:450–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malm WC et al (1994) Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States. J Geophys Res 99:1347–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng Y, Lohmann U, Leaitch R (2005) Importance of vertical velocity variations in the cloud droplet nucleation process of marine stratus clouds. J Geophys Res 110(D21):D21213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanmin Gong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Questions and Answers

Questioner Name: K. Alapaty

Q: You are looking for AOD data. This data is available from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program.

A: Thank you very much for the info. We will definitely be pursuing to get hold of any suitable data for our evaluation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gong, W. et al. (2014). Impact of Aerosol Activation on Modelled Regional Particulate Matter Mass and Size Distribution Due to Cloud Processing. In: Steyn, D., Builtjes, P., Timmermans, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5577-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics