The Geography of Rural Aging in a Regional Context, 1990–2008

  • Peter B. Nelson
Part of the Understanding Population Trends and Processes book series (UPTA, volume 7)


The population in many advanced economies is growing older, and the distribution of the aging population is geographically uneven within these countries. Certain areas show high concentrations of older people, while other areas remain young. The analysis in this chapter examines population data from 1990 to 2008 at the county level within the United States to answer three research questions: which counties in rural America are aging most rapidly; what factors contribute to the geographic unevenness of rural aging; and how do these factors vary across space? As the baby boomers aged into their 60s during the most recent decade, many more nonmetropolitan counties had increasing elderly populations, and the Great Plains and Appalachia stand out as areas with consistently increasing older populations. However, due to an overall slowdown in nonmetropolitan migration in the 2000s, aging in place has become a more powerful driver of nonmetropolitan aging. This shift has distinct policy implications for rural communities.


Natural Aging Real Estate Market Population Loss Elderly Migration County Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Brown, D. L., & Glasgow, N. (2008). Rural retirement migration. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bures, R. M. (1997). Migration and the life course: Is there a retirement transition? International Journal of Population Geography, 3(2), 109–119. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099–1220(199706)3:2<109::aid-ijpg65>;2-i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cromartie, J. (2009). Rural population and migration. Accessed 15 Oct 2010.
  4. Cromartie, J., & Nelson, P. B. (2009). Baby boom migration and its impact on rural America (Economic Research Report No. 79). Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  5. Day, F. A., & Barlett, J. M. (2000). Economic impact of retirement migration on the Texas hill country. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 19(1), 78–94. doi: 10.1177/073346480001900105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deller, S. C. (1995). Economic impact of retirement migration. Economic Development Quarterly, 9(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1177/089124249500900103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey, W., & Johnson, K. (1998). Concentrated immigration, restructuring, and the ‘selective’ deconcentration of the United States population. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues (pp. 79–106). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Fuguitt, G. V., Beale, C. L., & Tordella, S. J. (2002). Recent trends in older population change and migration for nonmetro areas, 1970–2000. Rural America, 17(3), 11–19.Google Scholar
  9. Fuguitt, G. V., & Heaton, T. B. (1995). The impact of migration on the nonmetropolitan population age structure, 1960–1990. Population Research and Policy Review, 14(2), 215–232. doi: 10.1007/bf01074459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, K. M. (2006). Demographic trends in rural and small town America (Reports on Rural America) (Vol. 1, No. 1). Durham: Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, K. M., & Cromartie, J. (2006). The rural rebound and its aftermath: changing demographic dynamics and regional contrasts. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 25–49). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, K. M., & Fuguitt, G. V. (2000). Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology, 65(1), 27–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1549–0831.2000.tb00341.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, K. M., Voss, P. R., Hammer, R. B., Fuguitt, G. V., & McNiven, S. (2005). Temporal and spatial variation in age-specific net migration in the United States. Demography, 42(4), 791–812. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirschner, A., Berry, E. H., & Glasgow, N. (2006). The changing faces of rural America. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 53–74). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Litwak, E., & Longino, C. F. (1987). Migration patterns among the elderly: A developmental perspective. The Gerontologist, 27(3), 266–272. doi: 10.1093/geront/27.3.266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morrill, R. L. (1995). Aging in place, age specific migration and natural decrease. The Annals of Regional Science, 29(1), 41–66. doi: 10.1007/bf01580362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pandit, K. (1997). Cohort and period effects in U.S. Migration: How demographic and economic cycles influence the migration schedule. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(3), 439–450. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parker, T. (2005). Measuring rurality: 2004 county typology codes—Methods, data sources, and documentation. Accessed 30 Nov 2011.
  19. Pastalan, L. A. (Ed.). (1999). Making aging in place work. Binghamton: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  20. Plane, D. A., & Heins, F. (2003). Age articulation of U.S. inter-metropolitan migration flows. The Annals of Regional Science, 37(1), 107–130. doi: 10.1007/s001680200114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reeder, R. J. (1998). Retiree attraction policies for rural America (Agriculture Information Bulletin 741). Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, A., & Raymer, J. (2001). Immigration and the regional demographics of the elderly population in the United States. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(1), S44–S55. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.1.S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, A., & Woodward, J. (1988). The sources of regional elderly population growth: Migration and aging-in-place. The Professional Geographer, 40(4), 450–459. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00450.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogerson, P. A. (1996). Geographic perspectives on elderly population growth. Growth and Change, 27(1), 75–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1996.tb00897.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowles, G. D., & Watkins, J. F. (1993). Elderly migration and development in small communities. Growth and Change, 24(4), 509–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1993.tb00136.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sastry, M. L. (1992). Estimating the economic impacts of elderly migration: An input–output analysis. Growth and Change, 23(1), 54–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1992.tb00572.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Serow, W. J., & Haas, W. H. (1992). Measuring the economic impact of retirement migration: The case of western North Carolina. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 11(2), 200–215. doi: 10.1177/073346489201100206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations. (2002). World population aging: 1950–2050. New York: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.Google Scholar
  29. US Census Bureau. (1990). Decennial census 100 percent count, age. Accessed 11 Feb 2010.
  30. US Census Bureau. (2000). Decennial Census 100% count, sex by age. Accessed 11 Feb 2010.
  31. US Census Bureau. (2009). Population estimates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Accessed 11 Feb 2010.
  32. Wilson, F. D. (1988). Components of change in migration and destination-propensity rates for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: 1935–1980. Demography, 25(1), 129–139. doi: 10.2307/2061482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiseman, R. (1979). Regional patterns of elderly concentration and migration. In S. M. Golant (Ed.), Location and environment of elderly population (pp. 21–36). Washington, DC and New York: V.H. Winston and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyMiddlebury CollegeMiddleburyUSA

Personalised recommendations