Advertisement

The Most Frequent Pollutants in a River

  • Marcello Benedini
  • George Tsakiris
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 70)

Abstract

There are numerous pollutants of various nature that affect a water body. They can be chemicals, bacteria or radioactive substances. Many of them are nonconservative and undergo changes when they are in contact with the water. The most frequent pollutants are the compounds of oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus, whose transformations can be described by means of specific biochemical processes. Their presence in the water quality models is realised in the form of local injection or first-order kinetics.

Keywords

River Water Algal Biomass Organic Nitrogen Ammonia Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexakis D (2011) Assessment of water quality in the Messolonghi-Etoliko and Neochorio region (West Greece) using hydrochemical and statistical analysis methods. Environ Monit Assess 182:397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedini M, Passino R, Piacentini G (1998) The quality of receiving bodies in agriculture-dominated areas of Italy. Paper presented at EURAQUA 5th scientific and technical review, Oslo, Norway, pp 93–108Google Scholar
  3. Chang HH (1998) Fluvial processes in river engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapra SC (1997) Surface water-quality modeling. WCB-McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapra SC, Pellettier G, Tao Hua (2006) QUAL2K: a modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality (version 2.04), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Chevereau G (1980) Mathematical model for oxygen balance in rivers. Models for environmental pollution control. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan US: 107–127Google Scholar
  7. Harrison R (2007) Principles of environmental chemistry. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hornberger GM, Kelly MG (1975) Atmospheric reaeration in a river using productivity analysis. J Environ Eng Div ASCE 101(EE5):729–739Google Scholar
  9. James A (1979) The value of biological indicators in relation to other parameters of water quality. In: James A, Evison L (eds) Biological indicators of water quality. Wiley, New York, (1): 1–13Google Scholar
  10. Marini L, Canepa M, Cipolli F, Ottonello G, Zuccolini MV (2001) Use of stream sediment chemistry to predict trace element chemistry of groundwater. A case study from the Bisagno valley (Genoa, Italy). J Hydrol 241:194–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merrington G, Winder L, Parkinson R, Redman M (2005) Agricultural pollution environmental problems and practical solutions. Taylor & Francis e-Library, Abingdon, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Millero FJ (2001) Physical chemistry of natural waters. Wiley Interscience of Geochemistry, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Millero FJ, Hershey JP (1989) Thermodynamic and kinetics of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. In: Saltzman ES, Cooper WJ (eds) Biogenic sulphur in the environment, vol 393, ACS symposium. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 283–313Google Scholar
  14. O’Brien DJ, Birkner FG (1977) Kinetics of oxygenation of reduced sulphur species in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol 11:1114–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Odum HT (1956) Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol Oceanogr 1(2):102–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettine M, Millero FJ (1990) Chromium speciation in seawater: the probable role of hydrogen peroxide. Limnol Oceanogr 35:730–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pham AN, Waite TD (2008) Oxygenation of Fe(II) in natural waters revisited: kinetic modeling approaches, rate constant estimation and importance of various reaction pathways. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:3616–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prati L, Richardson QB (1971) Water pollution and self-purification study on the Po River below Ferrara. Water Res 5:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schnauder I, Bockelmann B (2005) A numerical nitrogen transport model for Carmarthen Bay, Wales, UK. In: Proceedings of the 31st IAHR congress, Seoul, Korea, (2), pp 952–953 (printed summary)Google Scholar
  20. Stumm W, Morgan J (1996) Aquatic chemistry, 3rd edn. Environmental science and technology. A Wiley-Interscience series of texts and monographs. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhen-Gang J (2008) Hydrodynamics and water quality: modelling rivers, lakes and estuaries. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Benedini
    • 1
  • George Tsakiris
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Research InstituteArea Ricerca MontelibrettiRomeItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory of Reclamation Works and Water Resources ManagementNational Technical University of Athens School of Rural and Surveying EngineeringZografou, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations