Advertisement

Progress in Numerical Modelling: The Finite Difference Method

  • Marcello Benedini
  • George Tsakiris
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 70)

Abstract

Some partial differential equations (PDE) that describe several hydrodynamic phenomena do not have analytical solution, and hence they can only be solved by numerical methods. The finite difference method (FDM) is traditionally the most efficient way for numerical integration of PDEs, now empowered by the availability of computing facilities. Applied to the water quality models, the FDM has been developed according to several numerical schemes which are useful in practical applications. Some of these numerical schemes are described in this chapter, focussing on their particular characteristics, in order to provide guidance for the most frequently encountered cases of pollution in rivers and streams.

Keywords

Numerical Scheme Finite Difference Method Pollutant Concentration Finite Difference Method Pollution Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chapra SC (1997) Surface water-quality modeling. WCB-McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Eheart JW (2006) Some numerical properties of explicit solutions to the one-dimensional conservation equation. Water Int 31(2):252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1987) The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS. EPA/600/3-87/007, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernandez C, Karney B (2001) Numerical solution of the advection-dispersion-reaction equation under transient hydraulic condition. In: Proceedings of the 29th IAHR congress, Beijing, China, theme B, pp 58–72Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher CAJ (1990) Computational techniques for fluid dynamics 1 – Fundamental and general techniques, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 401Google Scholar
  6. Lax PD, Wendroff B (1964) Difference schemes for hyperbolic equations with high order of accuracy. Commun Pure Appl Math 17:381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stamou AI (1991) Numerical modelling of water quality in rivers using quick scheme. In: Tsakiris G (ed) Proceedings of the European conference advances in water resources technology, Athens, Greece, Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherland, pp 397–405Google Scholar
  8. Szymkiewicz R (2010). Numerical modeling in open channel hydraulics. Water sciences and technology library, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhihua O, Elsworth D (1989) An adaptive characteristics method for advective-diffusive transport. Appl Math Model 13:682–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Benedini
    • 1
  • George Tsakiris
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Research InstituteArea Ricerca MontelibrettiRomeItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory of Reclamation Works and Water Resources ManagementNational Technical University of Athens School of Rural and Surveying EngineeringZografou, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations