Urban-Rural Connections: Banda Aceh Through Conflict, Tsunami, and Decentralization

Chapter
Part of the ARI - Springer Asia Series book series (ARI, volume 3)

Abstract

Indonesia’s northwesternmost province of Aceh has been the scene of one of the most catastrophic natural disasters and large-scale reconstruction efforts in human history following the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. It has also been the site of one of Asia’s most protracted armed separatist conflicts, as well as a uniquely successful case study on the global map of conflict resolution. Since 2005, when an internationally mediated peace process in Helsinki led to resolution of the Aceh conflict, the province has become the subject of Indonesia’s biggest experiment with democratic decentralization via the conferral, in 2006, of “self-government” to Aceh within Indonesia. Many scholars use the provincial capital of Banda Aceh as a base, not least because of the city’s historical and contemporary relevance as a center of important events and moments of transformation. Yet, to date, little attention has been paid to Banda Aceh itself as the primary unit of analysis. In this chapter, we provide a Banda Aceh-centered analysis of transformations within and about Aceh since 1998. This is done by tracing the changing position of the city provincially, nationally, and internationally, as well as internally in its relations with other (mostly rural) parts of Aceh. In so doing, we bring into view largely overlooked urban-rural cleavages and interrelations.

Keywords

Mass Grave Indian Ocean Tsunami Indonesian Government Special Autonomy Counterinsurgency Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amnesty International. (2001). Briefing on the deteriorating human rights situation in Aceh for participants in the ASEAN forum, July 2001. Indonesia: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS)/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (BPPD). (2000). Propinsi Daerah Istimewah Aceh, Aceh dalam angka, BPS Propinsi Daerah Istimewah Aceh and BAPPEDA Propinsi Daerah Istimewah Aceh [Special province of Aceh in numbers]. Government of the Republic of Indonesia: Banda Aceh.Google Scholar
  3. Budidarsono, S., Wulan, Y. C., Budi, L. J., & Hendratno, S. (2007). Livelihoods and forest resources in Aceh and Nias for a sustainable forest resource management and economic progress (ICRAF Working Paper No. 55). Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre.Google Scholar
  4. Czaika, M., & Kis-Katos, K. (2009). Civil conflict and displacement: Village level determinants of forced migration in Aceh. Journal of Peace Research, 46(3), 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, M. N. (2006). Indonesia’s war over Aceh. Last stand on Mecca’s porch. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. di Tiro, H. (1965). The political future of the Malay Archipelago. New York: Atjeh Institute in America.Google Scholar
  7. di Tiro, H. (1984). Masa-depan politik dunia Melayu [The future of Malay world politics]. Sumatra: Kementerian Penerangan Negara Atjeh Sumatra.Google Scholar
  8. Hellman, J. (2003). Performing the nation: Cultural politics in New Order Indonesia. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Human Rights Watch. (2002). Accountability for human rights violations in Aceh. Human Rights Watch/Asia Division 14(1)(C). Human Rights Watch, Asia Division.Google Scholar
  10. International Crisis Group. (2005). Aceh: A new chance for peace (Asia Briefing No. 40). Jakarta/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  11. Kell, T. (1995). The roots of Acehnese rebellion, 1989–1992. New York: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project.Google Scholar
  12. Koalisi NGO HAM Aceh. (1999). Daftar nama-nama korban penembakan misterius (petrus) [List of names of mysterious shooting victims], 19 October 1998–2 June 1999. NGO Fact Sheet.Google Scholar
  13. Kusno, A. (2000). Behind the postcolonial: Architecture, urban space and political cultures in Indonesia. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Leitmann, J. (2007). Cities and calamities: Learning from post-disaster response in Indonesia. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(1), 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahdi, S. (2007, February 24–27). Where do IDPs go? Evidence of social capital from Aceh conflict and tsunami IDPs. Paper presented at the first international conference of Aceh and Indian Ocean Studies, Banda Aceh.Google Scholar
  16. McGee, T. G. (1991). The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: An expanded hypothesis. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, & T. G. McGee (Eds.), The extended metropolis: Settlement transition in Asia (pp. 3–26). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  17. McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is special autonomy the solution? (Policy studies 10). Washington, DC: East-west Center.Google Scholar
  18. McGibbon, R. (2006). Local leadership and the Aceh conflict. In A. Reid (Ed.), Verandah of violence. The background to the Aceh problem (pp. 315–359). Singapore/Seattle: Singapore University Press/University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, M. A. (2004). The Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Law: A serious response to Acehnese separatism? Journal of Asian Ethnicity, 5(3), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, M. A. (2006). What’s special about special autonomy in Aceh? In A. Reid (Ed.), Verandah of violence. The background to the Aceh problem (pp. 292–314). Singapore/Seattle: Singapore University Press/University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, M. A. (2009). Rebellion and reform in Indonesia. Jakarta’s security and autonomy policies in Aceh. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Missbach, A. (2007). Managing heterogeneity within a ‘transnational community of co-responsibility’. Exploratory snapshots of Acehnese diasporic life experiences in Sydney. In E. Streifeneder & A. Missbach (Eds.), Indonesia—The presence of the past: A festschrift in honour of Ingrid Wessel. Berlin: Regiospectra.Google Scholar
  23. Morfit, M. (2007). The road to Helsinki: The Aceh agreement and Indonesia’s democratic development. International Negotiation, 12(1), 111–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, E. E. (1983). Islam and politics in Aceh. A study of center-periphery relations in Indonesia. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. Nas, P. J. M. (2003). Ethnic identity in urban architecture: Generations of architects in Banda Aceh. In R. Schefold, P. J. M. Nas, & G. Domenig (Eds.), Indonesian houses: Tradition and transformation in vernacular architecture (pp. 133–154). Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nurdin, M. (2006). Banda Aceh overview—After one-year tsunami. Journal of Disaster Research, 1(1), 116–117.Google Scholar
  27. Parthasarathy, D. (2010, January 4–8). Intermediate urbanism? The spatiality of caste, class and capital in India. Paper presented at the international symposium on making global cities and the world economic crisis, Shenzhen, China.Google Scholar
  28. Phelps, N., Bunnell, T., & Miller, M. A. (2011). Post-disaster economic development in Aceh: Neoliberalization and other economic-geographical imaginaries. Geoforum, 42, 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, G. (1998). Rawan is as rawan does: The origins of disorder in New Order Aceh. Indonesia, 66, 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silvey, R., & Elmhirst, R. (2003). Engendering social capital: Women workers and rural-urban networks in Indonesia’s crisis. World Development, 31(5), 865–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinar Harapan. (2003, March 31). ‘Korupsi di Aceh, penduduk miskin meningkat. Sinar Harapan.Google Scholar
  32. SIRA (Sentral Informasi Referendum Aceh). (1999, May). Acehnese consistently fight for referendum in spite of having intimidation, Press Release.Google Scholar
  33. Taufik, A. (2001, January 29). Aceh. Regions. Tempo.Google Scholar
  34. TempoInteraktif. (2001, January 29). Deplu Bantah Larang Wartawan Asing. TempoInteraktif.Google Scholar
  35. The Jakarta Post. (1999a, July 31). Garuda raises capacity to Aceh. The Jakarta Post. Google Scholar
  36. The Jakarta Post. (1999b, August 2). SMAC to serve Banda Aceh. The Jakarta Post.Google Scholar
  37. The Jakarta Post. (2003, April 29). TNI sets up Aceh media center. The Jakarta Post.Google Scholar
  38. Waspada. (1999, June 7). Hasil lengkap jajak pendapat waspada: 56% referendum dan 25.3% otonomi luas. Waspada.Google Scholar
  39. World Bank. (2006). Aceh public expenditure analysis. Spending for reconstruction and poverty reduction. Washington, DC/Jakarta: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2007). World development report 2008—Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. World Bank. (2008). The impact of the conflict, the tsunami and reconstruction on poverty in Aceh. Aceh poverty assessment 2008. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asia Research InstituteNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations