Advertisement

A Mathematical Approach for Studying Ca2+-Regulated Smooth Muscle Contraction

  • Saeil C. Murtada
  • Gerhard A. Holzapfel

Abstract

Smooth muscle is found in various organs. It has mutual purposes such as providing mechanical stability and regulating organ size. To better understand the physiology and the function of smooth muscle different experimental setups and techniques are available. However, to interpret and analyze the experimental results basic models of smooth muscle are necessary. Advanced mathematical models of smooth muscle contraction further allow, to not, only investigate the experimental behavior but also to simulate and predict behaviors in complex boundary conditions that are not easy or even impossible to perform through in vitro experiments. In this chapter the characteristic behaviors of vascular smooth muscle, specially those relevant from a biomechanical point of view, and the mathematical models able to simulate and mimic those behaviors are reviewed and studied.

Keywords

Smooth Muscle Contraction Myosin Filament Muscle Stretch Elastic Serial Element Myosin Phosphorylation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for SCM was provided through a Project Grant (#20056167, #20094302) from the Swedish Research Council (VR) and the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Arner A (1982) Mechanical characteristics of chemically skinned guinea-pig taenia coli. Eur J Physiol 395:277–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dillon PF, Aksoy MO, Driska SP, Murphy RA (1981) Myosin phosphorylation and the cross-bridge cycle in arterial smooth muscle. Science 211:495–497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fung YC (1970) Mathematical representation of the mechanical properties of the heart muscle. J Biomech 269:441–515 Google Scholar
  4. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3:15–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ, (1966). The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184:170–192 Google Scholar
  6. Guilford WH, Warshaw DM (1998) The molecular mechanics of smooth muscle myosin. Comp Biochem Physiol 119:451–458 Google Scholar
  7. Hai CM, Murphy RA (1988) Cross-bridge phosphorylation and regulation of latch state in smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 254:C99–106 Google Scholar
  8. Herrera AM, McParland BE, Bienkowska A, Tait R, Paré PD, Seow CY (2005) Sarcomeres of smooth muscle: functional characteristics and ultrastructural evidence. J Cell Sci 118:2381–2392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61:1–48 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW (2010) Constitutive modelling of arteries. Proc R Soc A 466:1551–1597 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamm KE, Gerthoffer WH, Murphy RA, Bohr DF (1989) Mechanical properties of carotid arteries from DOCA hypertensive swine. Hypertension 13:102–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kato S, Osa T, Ogasawara T (1984) Kinetic model for isometric contraction in smooth muscle on the basis of myosin phosphorylation hypothesis. Biophys J 46:35–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murtada S, Kroon M, Holzapfel GA (2010a) A calcium-driven mechanochemical model for prediction of force generation in smooth muscle. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:749–762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murtada S, Kroon M, Holzapfel GA (2010b) Modeling the dispersion effects of contractile fibers in smooth muscles. J Mech Phys Solids 58:2065–2082 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murtada SC, Arner A, Holzapfel GA (2012) Experiments and mechanochemical modeling of smooth muscle contraction: significance of filament overlap. J Theor Biol 21:176–186 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson JW (1982) Simple model of smooth muscle myosin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation as rate-limiting mechanism. Biophys J 37:453–459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rachev A, Hayashi K (1999) Theoretical study of the effects of vascular smooth muscle contraction on strain and stress distributions in arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 27:459–468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rembold CM, Murphy RA (1990a) Latch-bridge model in smooth muscle: [Ca2+]i can quantitatively predict stress. Am J Physiol 259:C251–C257 Google Scholar
  19. Rembold CM, Murphy RA (1990b) Muscle length, shortening, myoplasmic [Ca2+] and activation of arterial smooth muscle. Circ Res 66:1354–1361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schriefl AJ, Zeindlinger G, Pierce DM, Regitnig P, Holzapfel GA (2012) Determination of the layer-specific distributed collagen fiber orientations in human thoracic and abdominal aortas and common iliac arteries. J R Soc Interface 9:1275–1286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV (2002) The sarcoplasmic reticulum: then and now. Novartis Found Symp 246:258–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stålhand J, Klarbring A, Holzapfel GA (2008) Smooth muscle contraction: mechanochemical formulation for homogeneous finite strains. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 96:465–481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wingard CJ, Browne AK, Murphy RA (1995) Dependence of force on length at constant cross-bridge phosphorylation in the swine carotid media. J Physiol 488:729–739 Google Scholar
  24. Woledge RC, Curtin NA, Homsher E (1985) Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
  25. Yang J, Clark JW Jr, Bryan RM, Robertson C (2003) The myogenic response in isolated rat cerebrovascular arteries: smooth muscle cell model. Med Eng Phys 25:691–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division Genetic Physiology, Department of Physiology and PharmacologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Institute of Biomechanics, Center of Biomedical EngineeringGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  3. 3.Department of Solid Mechanics, School of Engineering SciencesRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations