Advertisement

Mechanical Characterization of the Human Liver

  • Marc Hollenstein
  • Edoardo Mazza

Abstract

The aspiration technique was used to characterize the mechanical behavior of the liver. Intra-operative application on human organs aimed at (i) tissue classification towards development of novel diagnostic procedures, and (ii) constitutive modeling of liver tissue. The first goal was achieved using scalar parameters extracted from time histories of aspiration pressure and deformation. Determination of parameters for nonlinear time dependent constitutive model formulations required solving the inverse problem. Glisson’s capsule was analyzed separately from parenchyma and was shown to behave as I 2-material. 207 aspiration measurements were performed on 33 patients. The influence of the contact force between the aspiration device and the liver was kept minimal in order to achieve a high reproducibility of the mechanical measurements. Histopathological characterization with biopsies taken at the measurement location allowed analyzing the influence of tissue microstructure. Tumors with high connective tissue content were shown to significantly affect the mechanical response.

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Elastography Liver Capsule Aspiration Technique Inflation Test Aspiration Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. S. Breitenstein, University Hospital Zurich, for performing the intraoperative measurements with the aspiration device. This work was partly supported by the CO-ME/NCCR research network of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Bauer M, Mazza E, Jabareen M, Sultan L, Bajka M, Lang U, Zimmermann R, Holzapfel GA (2009) Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144:S77–S81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JD, Rosen J, Kim YS, Chang L, Sinananand M, Hannaford B (2003) In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. In: Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Stredney D (eds) Medicine meets virtual reality 11. Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 94. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 26–32 Google Scholar
  3. Bürzle W, Haller C, Ehrbar M, Mazza E (2012) Experimental investigations of fetal membrane mechanics. In: Holzapfel GA (ed) CD-ROM proceedings of the European solid mechanics conference 2012, Graz, Austria Google Scholar
  4. Carter FJ, Frank TG, Davies PJ, McLean D, Cuschieri A (2001) Measurement and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Med Image Anal 5:231–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chui C, Kobayashi E, Chen X, Hisada T, Sakuma I (2007) Transversely isotropic properties of porcine liver tissue: experiments and constitutive modelling. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:99–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egger J (2008) An inflation device for testing human fetal membranes. Master’s Thesis, ETH, Zurich Google Scholar
  7. Gao Z, Lister K, Desai JP (2010) Constitutive modeling of liver tissue: experiment and theory. Ann Biomed Eng 38:505–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hollenstein M (2011) PhD Thesis, No. 19587, ETH, Zurich Google Scholar
  9. Hollenstein M, Jabareen M, Breitenstein S, Riener M-O, Clavien P-A, Bajka M, Mazza E (2009) Intraoperative mechanical characterization of human liver. Proc Appl Math Mech 9:83–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollenstein M, Bugnard G, Joos R, Kropf S, Villiger P, Mazza E (2011) Towards laparoscopic tissue aspiration. Med Image Anal (submitted) Google Scholar
  11. Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R, Annet L, Salameh N, ter Beek LC, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19:173–179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerdok A, Ottensmeyer M, Howe R (2006) Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver. J Biomech 39:2221–2231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazza E, Nava A, Hahnloser D, Jochum W, Bajka M (2007) The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal 11:663–672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mazza E, Grau P, Hollenstein M, Bajka M (2008) Constitutive modeling of human liver based on in vivo measurements. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 11:726–733 Google Scholar
  15. Nava A (2007) In vivo characterization of the mechanical response of soft human tissue. ETH Zurich Diss., 17060 Google Scholar
  16. Nava A, Mazza E, Furrer M, Villiger P, Reinhart WH (2008) In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver. Med Image Anal 12:203–216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ottensmeyer MP (2002) TeMPeST I-D: an instrument for measuring solid organ soft tissue properties. Exp Tech 26:48–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rouvière O, Yin M, Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Burgart LJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubin MB, Bodner SR (2002) A three-dimensional nonlinear model for dissipative response of soft tissue. Int J Solids Struct 39:5081–5099 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O (2007) A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response. Med Image Anal 11:361–373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, Christidis C, Ziol M, Poulet B, Kazemi F, Beaugrand M, Palau R (2003) Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1705–1713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwartz J, Denninger M, Rancourt D, Moisan C, Laurendeau D (2005) Modelling liver tissue using a visco-elastic model for surgery simulation. Med Image Anal 9:103–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tay BK, Kim J, Srinivasan MA (2006) In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:2129–2138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. von Siebenthal M, Székely G, Lomax AJ, Cattin PC (2007) Systematic errors in respiratory gating due to intrafraction deformations of the liver. Med Phys 34:3620–3629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zheng YP, Leung SF, Mak AFT (2000) Assessment of neck tissue fibrosis using an ultrasound palpation system: a feasibility study. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:497–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mechanical SystemsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations