Finland: Satisfaction Guaranteed! A Tale of Two Systems

Chapter
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 7)

Abstract

Whereas the trend in many countries has been towards merging former teaching institutions with each other and with existing universities to form new universities (such as in Australia and the UK), in Finland, a new higher education subsector has been created to become the second branch of Finnish higher education. Finland’s polytechnics have existed for a mere 20 years, having been created from myriad small vocational teaching institutions. Therefore, Finland has a new academic group responding to the needs of a set of nonuniversity institutions, and it is relevant to consider the attributes of these polytechnic academics, compared with the attributes of equivalent cohorts of university academics. Results…..

Keywords

High Education Institution Academic Freedom Academic Staff High Education System High Education Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This chapter was written with the assistance of funding to support the EUROAC-FIN (2011) project received from HEINE, the Network for Higher Education and Innovation Research, University of Helsinki.

References

  1. Aarrevaara, T. (2007). Enhancing Universities in Finland. The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 4, 261–292.Google Scholar
  2. Aarrevaara, T., & Pekkola, E. (2010). Muuttuva Akateeminen Professio – Maaraportti (Changing academic profession – A country report, in Finnish). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I., & Elander, C. (2009). Brave new world – Higher education reform in Finland. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(2), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I., & Pekkola, E. (2011). Finland: CAPtive academics – An examination of the binary divide. In W. Locke, W. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education. The perspectives of the academy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Ahola, S. (1997). ‘Different but equal’ – Student expectations and the Finnish dual higher education policy. European Journal of Education, 32(3), 291–302.Google Scholar
  6. DEET (Department of Employment, Education and Training). (1993). National report on Australia’s higher education sector. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  7. EUROAC. (2011). http://blogs.helsinki.fi/euroac-fin/.Google Scholar
  8. Hölttä, S., & Malkki, P. (2000). Response of Finnish higher education institutions to the national information society programme. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Locke, W., & Bennion, A. (2011). The United Kingdom: Academic retreat or professional renewal? In W. Locke, W. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education. The perspectives of the academy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyytinen, A. (2011). Finnish polytechnics in the regional innovation system – Towards new ways of action (Higher Education Finance and Management Series). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Education, Finland. (1996). Higher education policy in Finland. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Education, Finland. (2005). Korkeakoulututkintojen viitekehys (Description of Finnish higher education qualifications, in Finnish). The ‘Qualifications Framework’ Committee. Reports of the Ministry of Education, Finland 2005:4. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  13. Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland. (2011). Yliopistot ja ammattikorkeakoulut 2011 (Universities and Polytechnics 2011, in Finnish). Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, 2011:10. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  14. Salminen, H., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2010). Reform of financial and administrative status of Polytechnics. Ministry of Education and Culture, Publications 2010:23. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  15. Statistics Finland. (2009). Lasten Koulutus Mukailee vanhempien koulutusta (Children’s education is a reflection of parents’ education). Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/artikkelit/2009/art_2009-03-16_002.html?s=2.
  16. Statistics Finland. (2011). The population of Finland in 2008. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2008/vaerak_2008_2009-03-27_tie_001_en.html.
  17. Vuori, J. (2010). Leadership frames of program directors at Finnish Universities of applied sciences (Higher Education Finance and Management-Series). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, B., Bowerbank, A., Geens, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2009). Regional visit report RVR1. Helsinki Metropolitan Region, 8–11 November 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher Education Governance and Management UnitUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.School of Education and ArtsUniversity of BallaratBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations