Skip to main content

Beyond Embodiment: From Internal Representation of Action to Symbolic Processes

  • 1890 Accesses

Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM,volume 8)

Abstract

In sensorimotor integration, representation involves an anticipatory model of the action to be performed. This model integrates efferent signals (motor commands), its reafferent consequences (sensory consequences of an organism’s own motor action), and other afferences (sensory signals) originated by stimuli independent of the action performed. Representation, a form of internal modeling, is invoked to explain the fact that behavior oriented to the achievement of future goals is relatively independent from the immediate environment. Internal modeling explains how a cognitive system achieves its goals despite variations in the environment with insufficient and noisy sensory–perceptual data. In a self that acts intentionally on the environment, knowledge is dependent upon the necessity to guide actions directed toward an aim. The self-inner model, a representation of internal and external environments (including reafferent and afferent messages) and also of the behavior plans and desirable future states (aims) and efferent intentions (motor planning and motor command messages), is intrinsically linked to a thinking capacity, which is supposed to emerge from the binding of multiple influences. Thinking emerges when higher behavior strategies are considered possible and capable of leading to aims or the fulfillment of intentions. In this model, symbolization processes are projective and anticipatory and, in this way, beyond present referents. Symbolization occurs linked to action planning, command, and regulation in mental simulation. Meaning is related to an inner sense of a self that acts over the environment.

Keywords

  • Cognitive model
  • Anticipation
  • Embodiment
  • Symbolic processes
  • Neurophysiological functions

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_9
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-5419-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Bertenthal, B., & Fischer, K. (1987). Development of self recognition in the infant. Developmental Psychology, 14, 44–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S.-J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551–559.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 14–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, P. W. (2002). Phantom limbs: The body in the mind. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 7(3), 252–268.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R. (2000). From nerve cells to cognition: The internal cellular representation required for perception and action. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schawrtz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neural science (pp. 381–402). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (1995). Awareness of one’s own body: An attentional theory of its nature, development and brain basis. In J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel, & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 205–223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P., & Moore, M. (1977). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2425–2438.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. H., & Melzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustic Society, 100, 2425–2438.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Llinás, R. R. (1987). ‘Mindness’ as a functional state of the brain. In C. Blakemore & S. Greenfield (Eds.), Mindwaves. Thoughts on intelligence, identity and consciousness. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llinás, R. R. (2001). I of the vortex. From neurons to self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A., & Moore, K. (1999). Persons and representation: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel & B. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 9–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacherie, E. (2005). Perceiving intentions. In J. Saagua (Ed.), A explicação da intrerpretação humana (pp. 401–414). Lisbon: Edições Colibri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacherie, E. (2007). The sense of control and the sense of agency. Psyche, 13(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107, 179–217.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. Brain, 121, 1603–1630.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P. (2010). The innate sense of the body develops to become a public affair by 2–3 years. Neuropsychologia, 48, 738–745.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., & Hespos, S. J. (1997). Differential rooting response by neonates: Evidence for an early sense of self. Early development and Parenting, 6, 105–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (2002). Who’s in the mirror? Self-other discrimination in specular images by four- and nine-month- old infants. Child Development, 73, 35–46.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010a). Biosymbols: Symbols in life and mind. Biosemiotics, 3(1), 17–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010b). How is meaning grounded in the organism? Biosemiotics, 3(2), 131–146.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 387–407.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reaffernzprinzip echselwirkungen zwichen zentrainervensystem und peripherie. Naturwissenschalten, 37, 464–476.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2002). First-person thoughts and embodied self-awareness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 7–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Barahona da Fonseca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

da Fonseca, I.B., da Fonseca, J.B., Pereira, V. (2013). Beyond Embodiment: From Internal Representation of Action to Symbolic Processes. In: Swan, L. (eds) Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_9

Download citation