Skip to main content

Not So Exceptional: Away from Chomskian Saltationism and Towards a Naturally Gradual Account of Mindfulness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Origins of Mind

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 8))

  • 1998 Accesses

Abstract

It is argued that a chief obstacle to a naturalistic explanation of the origins of mind is human exceptionalism, as exemplified in the seventeenth century by René Descartes and in the twentieth century by Noam Chomsky. As an antidote to human exceptionalism, we turn to the account of aesthetic judgment in Charles Darwin’s Descent of Man, according to which the mental capacities of humans differ from those of lower animals only in degree, and not in kind. Thoroughgoing naturalistic explanation of these capacities is made easier by shifting away from the substance-metaphysical implications of the search for an account of mind, toward a dispositional account of the origins of mindfulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are grateful to Jared Kinggard for alerting us to this text. See Kinggard (2010).

  2. 2.

    We are grateful to Christine Wieseler for alerting us to the source of this observation, a letter by Descartes to the Marquis of Newcastle, November 23, 1646. Later in the same text Descartes allows, “if they [animals] thought as we do, they would have an immortal soul as we do” (Descartes 2000, 277). But this conclusion is unacceptable if one aims to provide a purely naturalistic explanation.

  3. 3.

    This ignores, for the moment, the many fascinating attempts to teach such languages to nonhumans, of which arguably the most successful have involved not primates, but birds (see Pepperberg 2002).

  4. 4.

    Though we have our doubts about whether it has been treated as an empirical question in the practice of comparative linguistics. If every time a new language is described that appears to violate one or another stricture of Generative Grammar, the community response is to tweak Generative Grammar to accommodate it, one begins to suspect a self-sealing argument.

  5. 5.

    Though it can—at least in plants, where allopolyploid speciation is possible. This occurs when a hybrid, which is capable of reproduction, is not capable of breeding with either of its parent species. See e.g., Soltis and Soltis (1989).

References

  • Campbell, R. L., & Bickhard, M. H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages (Contributions to human development). Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, R. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). The energetic significance of cooking. Journal of Human Evolution, 57, 379–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1997). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2009). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1992). The presence of a symbol (Reprinted in J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind Design II. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (2004). The descent of man (2nd ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (2000). Philosophical essays and correspondence. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O., Sarkissian, H., & Wong, D. (2007). Naturalizing ethics. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1992). The Panda’s thumb: More reflections in natural history. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinggard, J. (2010). Rethinking ethical naturalism. PhD thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (2011). Epistemic objects as interactive loci. Axiomathes, 21, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (Eds.). (2003). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg, I. (2002). The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of African grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2007). The language instinct: How the mind creates language (3rd ed.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., & Soltis, P. S. (1989). Allopolyploid speciation in Tragopogon: Insights from Chloroplast DNA. American Journal of Botany, 76(6), 1119–1124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (2010). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew M. Winters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winters, A.M., Levine, A. (2013). Not So Exceptional: Away from Chomskian Saltationism and Towards a Naturally Gradual Account of Mindfulness. In: Swan, L. (eds) Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics