From Content to Competency: Challenges Facing Higher Education Language Teaching in Europe
The Bologna Process has accelerated the drive for a more competency-based approach to the definition of learning outcomes in all sectors of higher education, including language teaching. Traditionally, language learning was viewed in terms of the assimilation of a certain aggregation of content. At present, with languages assuming a rising profile in the academic programme of students of non-linguistic disciplines, there is an urgent need to define learning outcomes in terms of pragmatically relevant competencies. This is a reflection of the fact that, in the increasingly multilingual international context in which students and graduates are required to operate, practical language skills are crucial. The challenge facing language educators is thus to define what students will be able to do in the target language in a range of social, academic and professional contexts. The Council of Europe’s Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) offers language educators a precious tool in responding to this challenge. The chapter surveys the need for a competency-based approach to goal-setting in higher education language teaching and, on this basis, examines the way in which the CEFR can be used to guide goal-setting, course development and evaluation.
KeywordsHigh Education European Union Language Policy Language Learning Language Teaching
- Arnold, Jane (ed.). 1999. Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brindley, Gregory. 1984. Needs analysis and objective setting in the adult migrant education program. Sydney: New South Wales Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar
- Brookes, Arthur, and Peter Grundy (eds.). 1988. Individualisation and autonomy in language learning. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
- Brumfit, Chistopher. 1984. Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Coleman, Hywel. 1996. Society and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. European Language Portfolio. http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/?L=E&M=/main_pages/introduction.html. Accessed 15 April 2012.
- ENLU. 2004–2007. European Network for the Promotion of Language Learning among all Undergraduates. http://www.celelc.org/matrix_engine/content.php?page_id=507. Accessed 15 April 2012.
- European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education. 2003. Realising the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the conference of ministers responsible for higher education in Berlin on 19th September 2003. http://www.eua.be/fileadmin/user_upload/files/EUA1_documents/OFFDOC_BP_Berlin_communique_final.1066741468366.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2010.
- Holec, Henri. 1987. The learner as manager: Managing learning or managing to learn? In Learner strategies in language learning, ed. Anita Wenden and Joan Rubin, 147–157. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Holliday, Adrian. 1994. Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mackiewicz, Wolfgang. 2002. Lifelong Foreign Language Learning. Speech presented at the European Seminar on Foreign Language Learning Needs in Education Systems. Valencia: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 5–7 May, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
- MOLAN. 2007–2010. Network for the exchange of information about good practices that serve to motivate language learners. http://www.molannetwork.org/matrix_engine/content.php?page_id=1418. Accessed 15 April 2012.
- Munby, John. 1978. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Oxford, Rebecca. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
- Richterich, René. 1973. Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
- Robinson, Patricia. 1991. ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Skehan, Peter. 1989. Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
- Trim, John. 1980. The place of needs analysis in the Council of Europe’s modern languages project. In Foreign language teaching: Meeting individual needs, ed. H. Altman and C. James, 46–65. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Tudor, Ian. 1996. Learner-centredness as language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tudor, Ian. 2001. The dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tudor, Ian. 2008. Higher education language policy: Why and how? In Languages at work in Europe: Festschrift in Honour of Professor Wolfgang Mackiewicz, ed. Karen Lauridsen and Daniel Toudic, 51–64. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.Google Scholar
- Tudor, Ian. 2009. Promoting language learning in European higher education: an overview of strategies. European Journal of Language Policy 1(2): 188–205.Google Scholar
- Tudor, Ian, and Wolfgang Mackiewicz. 2009. Bologna and languages: Reference points for higher education language policy development. In English language teaching in the European Credit Transfer System: Facing the challenge, ed. Maria Pérez Canado, 35–53. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Widdowson, Henry. 1978. Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar