Skip to main content

Influence of the Variability of Concrete Mechanical Properties on the Seismic Response of Existing RC Framed Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 24))

Abstract

In Italy, many RC framed buildings have been realized in the 1960s and the 1970s before the adoption of seismic codes. These buildings were designed for vertical loads only and were realized with concrete having poor and nonhomogeneous mechanical properties. This last condition is usually neglected despite it significantly affects the seismic response of the structures. A sample structure is considered to represent a typical existing RC building realized in Italy before the introduction of seismic codes. The structure is a four-story RC framed building designed for vertical loads only. The variability of concrete mechanical properties is evaluated on the base of an extensive survey developed by the authors on a large sample of RC framed buildings realized before the adoption of seismic codes. The seismic response of the sample structure is evaluated performing a nonlinear static analysis. The seismic demand is defined following the EC8 prescriptions. In the analysis the concrete strength has been described through a probabilistic domain, and a different value of strength, consistent with the assumed domain, has been assigned to each storey of the sample structure. Therefore, an irregular distribution of stiffness and strength is assumed along the height of the building. The seismic response of the structure is expressed in terms of maximum interstory drift. The increase of the interstory drift due to the considered irregularity is analyzed following the instructions of EC8 and FEMA 356. The obtained results show that the EC8 approach can result not adequate to describe an irregular distribution of the concrete strength along the height of the building. The approach suggested by FEMA 356 provides a better representation of the seismic behavior of the sample structure, despite being not conservative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Society of Civil Engineering (2000) Prestandard for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofaro MT (2009) Metodi di valutazione della resistenza a compressione del calcestruzzo di strutture in c.a. esistenti. PhD dissertation, Università di Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano, M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2010) Seismic performance of irregular 3D RC existing frames. In: Proceedings of the 14th ECEE, Ohrid, 30 Aug–3 Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • EC 8-3 (2005) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings, European standard EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchin P, Pinto PE, Rajeev P (2010) Confidence factor? J Earthq Eng 14(7):989–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalameh F, Elafante L, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2011) Knowledge-based performance assessment of existing RC buildings. J Earthq Eng 15(3):362–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge 5/11/1971 n. 1086 (1971) Norme per la disciplina delle opere in conglomerato cementizio armato, normale e precompresso ed a struttura metallica. G.U. 321 del 21/12/1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge 2/2/1974 n. 64 (1974) Provvedimenti per le costruzioni con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche. G.U. del 21/04/1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seismostruct v5.2.1 released (2011) Computer code, finite element package. http://seismosoft.com

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the project DPC-ReLUIS 2010/2013 Task 1.1.2. “Strutture in cemento armato ordinarie e prefabbricate.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario De Stefano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Ambrisi, A., De Stefano, M., Tanganelli, M., Viti, S. (2013). Influence of the Variability of Concrete Mechanical Properties on the Seismic Response of Existing RC Framed Structures. In: Lavan, O., De Stefano, M. (eds) Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics