Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theoretical and Mathematical Physics ((TMP))

  • 7580 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we present the classical Hamilton-Jacobi theory. This theory has played an enormous role in the development of theoretical and mathematical physics. On the one hand, it builds a bridge between classical mechanics and other branches of physics, in particular, optics. On the other hand, it yields a link between classical and quantum theory. We start with deriving the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and proving the classical Jacobi Theorem. We interpret the Hamilton-Jacobi equation geometrically as an equation for a Lagrangian submanifold of phase space which is contained in the coisotropic submanifold given by a level set of the Hamiltonian. Using this geometric picture, we extract a general method for solving initial value problems for arbitrary first order partial differential equations of the Hamilton-Jacobi type, the method of characteristics. It turns out that one can go beyond the case where a solution is generated by a single function on configuration space. To do so, one must consider Morse families, that is, families of Morse functions depending on additional parameters. In this chapter, we develop the theory of Morse families in a systematic way. Subsequently, we present the theory of critical points of Lagrangian submanifolds in cotangent bundles. This includes a topological characterization in terms of the Maslov class and a description of the topological data in terms of generating Morse families. Finally, we discuss applications in the spirit of geometric asymptotics. First, we study the eikonal equation of geometric optics, including the formation of caustics. Second, we analyse the transport equation and present a detailed study of its geometry. On this basis, we derive first order short wave asymptotic solutions for a class of first-order partial differential equations. In this analysis a key role is played by a consistency condition of topological type, the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization condition. We discuss applications to the Helmholtz and to the Schrödinger equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, the phase space will always be the cotangent bundle of some configuration space.

  2. 2.

    Points where the Lagrangian submanifold is not transversal to the fibres.

  3. 3.

    The same statement holds true for a generating function \(S(\mathbf{q},\bar{\mathbf{p}},t)\) of the second kind with parameters \(\bar{p}_{i}\).

  4. 4.

    For the case where is an energy surface, this has already been discussed in Sect. 9.1.

  5. 5.

    The notation \(\bar{q}^{i}\) for the parameters is a matter of convention, their physical meaning depends on the concrete context.

  6. 6.

    Theorem 12.3.1 extends to this more general situation. For the proof one has to apply the Tubular Neighbourhood Theorem for embedded submanifolds to , see Remark 6.4.7.

  7. 7.

    According to Example 1.6.6, Λ S (B S ) can nevertheless be equipped with a submanifold structure, though in two inequivalent ways. Both of them are Lagrangian.

  8. 8.

    See Example 8.3.8/4.

  9. 9.

    For an intrinsic definition, see [36, §4.3].

  10. 10.

    We refer to Remark 12.6.16 for a comment on the notion of stability in this context.

  11. 11.

    According to Remark 12.5.3/2, \(W = \mathrm{T}_{\xi}(\mathrm{T}^{\ast}_{x} Q) \cap\iota'(\mathrm{T}_{\xi}L)\).

  12. 12.

    We may of course assume B S and hence \(\tilde{B}_{\tilde{S}}\) to be connected.

  13. 13.

    This means, in particular, that F(L) does not intersect for \(n < \frac{k(k+1)}{2}\).

  14. 14.

    This is a consequence of the Sard Theorem 1.5.18, see Lemma 4.1.3 in [13].

  15. 15.

    By an abuse of notation, via the diffeomorphism \(B_{S_{i}} \to U_{i}\) induced by \(\varLambda_{S_{i}}\), \(\mathrm{index} ((S_{i})''_{y_{i} y_{i}} )\) is viewed as a function on U i .

  16. 16.

    For any two choices, the quadratic forms \(S''_{yy}(\xi )\) are similar and hence have the same index.

  17. 17.

    If h is an even smooth function on ℝ, there exists a unique smooth function \(\tilde{h}\) on ℝ such that \(h(y) = \tilde{h}(y^{2})\). If h depends smoothly on parameters, then so does \(\tilde{h}\).

  18. 18.

    A Morse family over Q is stable if it is an inner point of its stable equivalence class with respect to a certain C -topology on the space of all Morse families over Q.

  19. 19.

    While one can show that for almost all functions f these subsets are submanifolds indeed [287, 288], the Thom-Boardman singularities can also be defined in the general case by using jet techniques as developed by Boardman.

  20. 20.

    Thus, in particular, we ignore polarization phenomena.

  21. 21.

    Built in analogy to the energy density and of the Poynting vector in Maxwell electrodynamics.

  22. 22.

    More precisely, one may view light rays as wave packets, whose width in the direction transversal to the energy current vector is negligible. That such wave packets can be prepared follows from the uncertainty relation for the Fourier transform in the short wave approximation.

  23. 23.

    This is the abstract counterpart of the condition \(|S_{0}^{\prime}(y)| < 1\) found in Example 12.7.10.

  24. 24.

    For a quite exhaustive discussion of this equation in theoretical optics, we refer to the book of Römer [253].

  25. 25.

    In brief, for s∈ℝ, an s-density on a real vector space W of dimension n is a mapping ν:W n→ℝ satisfying ν(Aw 1,…,Aw n )=|detA|s ν(w 1,…,w n ) for all endomorphisms A of W. The s-densities on W form a vector space of dimension 1. By taking the s-densities on the tangent spaces at every point of a manifold M one obtains the real line bundle |Λ|s M of pointwise s-densities on M. Sections in this bundle are called s-densities on M. Every n-form on M defines an s-density by . In particular, if M is orientable, |Λ|s M is trivial for every s. The product of an s 1-density ν 1 and an s 2-density ν 2 on M is defined by (ν 1 ν 2)(X 1,…,X n ):=ν 1(X 1,…,X n )ν 2(X 1,…,X n ). It yields an (s 1+s 2)-density. The calculus of differential forms, notably the pull-back and, based on that, the Lie derivative, extends in an obvious way to s-densities.

  26. 26.

    Because the analytic solutions are determined up to an additive constant.

  27. 27.

    With respect to the Euclidean metric.

  28. 28.

    For convenience, in the remainder, we stick to this simplified notation.

  29. 29.

    Which can always be chosen to intersect the singular subset transversally.

  30. 30.

    may be identified with the pull-back under ι of the so-called prequantum line bundle over (T Q,dθ), see Sect. 4.1 and Appendix D of [36] for a detailed description.

  31. 31.

    Named after Wentzel, Brillouin and Kramers.

  32. 32.

    See e.g. [110, §IV.2].

  33. 33.

    This goes back to Ludwig [187], see also [86, 157].

References

  1. Agricola, I., Friedrich, T.: Globale Analysis. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2001), in German

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anné, C.: A topological definition of the Maslov bundle. Math. J. Univ. Frontera 8, 1–15 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, V.I.: On a characteristic class entering in quantization conditions. Funct. Anal. Appl. 1, 1–13 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold, V.I.: Singularities of smooth mappings. Russ. Math. Surv. 23, 1–43 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, V.I.: Normal forms of functions near degenerate critical points, Weyl groups A k , D k , E k , and Lagrangian singularities. Funct. Anal. Appl. 6, 254–272 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold, V.I.: Critical points of smooth functions and their normal forms. Russ. Math. Surv. 30, 1–75 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold, V.I.: Singularities of Caustics and Wave Fronts. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold, V.I.: Catastrophe Theory. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold, V.I., Givental, A.B.: Symplectic geometry. In: Arnold, V.I., Novikov, S.P. (eds.) Dynamical Systems IV. Symplectic Geometry and Its Applications. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold, V.I., Goryunov, V.V., Lyashko, O.V., Vasil’ev, V.A.: Singularity Theory, vol. I. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bates, S., Weinstein, A.: Lectures on the Geometry of Quantization. Berkeley Mathematics Lecture Notes, vol. 8. AMS, Providence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benenti, S.: Hamiltonian Optics and Generating Families. Napoli Series on Physics and Astrophysics, vol. 7. Bibliopolis, Naples (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benenti, S., Tulczyjew, W.M.: The geometrical meaning and globalization of the Hamilton-Jacobi method. In: Proc. Differential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics, Aix-en-Provence, Salamanca, 1979. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 836. Springer, Berlin (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benenti, S., Tulczyjew, W.M.: Geometry of static mechanical systems with constraints. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 124, 139–160 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Boardman, J.M.: Singularities of differentiable maps. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 33, 21–57 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Byun, Y.: Maslov indices in practice. Trends Math. 5(1), 1–9 (2002). Information Center for Mathematical Sciences 

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Duistermaat, J.J.: Oscillatory integrals, Lagrange immersions and unfolding of singularities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 27, 207–281 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdélyi, A.: Asymptotic Expansions. Dover, New York (1956)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Galindo, A., Pascual, P.: Quantum Mechanics, vol. II. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Golubitski, M., Guillemin, V.: Stable Mappings and Their Singularities. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 14. Springer, Berlin (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guillemin, V., Sternberg, S.: Geometric Asymptotics. Math. Surveys Monogr., vol. 14. AMS, Providence (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Guillemin, V., Sternberg, S.: Semi-classical analysis. Lecture Notes (2010). Available at Victor Guillemins homepage, http://math.mit.edu/~vwg

  23. Hirzebruch, F.: Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Springer, Berlin (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hörmander, L.: Fourier integral operators I. Acta Math. 127, 79–183 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Janeczko, S.: Singularities of Lagrangian varieties and related topics. Acta Appl. Math. 25, 21–57 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Keller, J.B.: A geometrical theory of diffraction. In: Calculus of Variations and Its Applications. Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math., vol. 8, pp. 27–52. McGraw-Hill, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Libermann, P., Marle, C.-M.: Symplectic Geometry and Analytical Mechanics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ludwig, D.: Uniform asymptotic expansions at a caustic. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 19, 215–250 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Maslov, V.P.: Théorie des Perturbations et Méthodes Asymptotiques. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maslov, V.P., Fedoryuk, M.V.: Quasi-Classical Approximation for the Equations of Quantum Mechanics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Mather, J.N.: Stability of C -mappings: I. The division theorem. Ann. Math. 87, 89–104 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mather, J.N.: Stability of C -mappings: II. Infinitesimal stability implies stability. Ann. Math. 89, 254–291 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Mather, J.N.: Stability of C -mappings: III. Finitely determined map-germs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 35, 127–156 (1968)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Mather, J.N.: Stability of C -mappings: IV. Classification of stable germs by R-relations. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 37, 223–248 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Mather, J.N.: Stability of C -mappings: V. Transversality. Adv. Math. 4, 301–336 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Römer, H.: Theoretische Optik. VCH, Weinheim (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thom, R.: Les singularités des applications différentiables. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 6, 43–87 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Thom, R.: Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. An Outline of a General Theory of Models. Benjamin, Elmsford (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Torrence, R.J., Tulczyjew, W.M.: Gauge invariant canonical mechanics for charged particles. J. Math. Phys. 14, 1725–1732 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tulczyjew, W.M.: Gauge independent formulation of dynamics of charged particles. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Sect. A 34, 25–43 (1981)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Tulczyjew, W.M.: Lagrangian submanifolds, statics and dynamics of dynamical systems. In: Dynamical Systems and Microphysics, pp. 3–26. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tulczyjew, W.M.: Control of static mechanical systems. In: Dynamical Systems and Microphysics, pp. 359–377. Academic Press, Orlando (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weinstein, A.: Lectures on Symplectic Manifolds. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 29. AMS, Providence (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Whitney, H.: On singularities of mappings of euclidean spaces: I. Mappings of the plane into the plane. Ann. Math. 62, 374–410 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rudolph, G., Schmidt, M. (2013). Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. In: Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5345-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics