Skip to main content

Landscape as Method and Medium for the Ecological Design of Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design

Part of the book series: Future City ((FUCI,volume 3))

Abstract

“Landscape” refers both to a conceptual field that examines how humans affect geographic space and to real places, and the word has both analytical and experiential implications. Pairing the analytical and the experiential enables landscape to be a catalyst for synthesis in science and for insight in urban ecological design. Emphasizing that science is fundamental to ecological design, this essay broadly interprets urban ecological design to include intentional change of landscapes in cities, their megaregions, and resource hinterlands. The essay offers two laws and two related principles for employing landscape as a medium and a method for urban ecological design. The laws observe that landscapes integrate environmental processes and that landscapes are visible. Two related principles explain how these inherent characteristics can be used to effect sustainability by using landscape as a medium for synthesis and in a method that invites creative invention.

*Published first as: Joan Iverson Nassauer. Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning 106 (2012) 221–229. Elsevier B.V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (1999) Spatial concepts, planning strategies, and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. In: Klopatek J, Gardner R (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert C, Zimmermann T, Kneilling J, von Haaren C (2012) Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe Valley Biosphere Reserve. Landsc Urban Plan 105:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1987) Problems of scaling in restoration ecology: a practical application. In: Jordan WR III, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton J, Haslett T (2007) Analysis, synthesis, systems thinking and the scientific method: rediscovering the importance of open systems. Syst Res Behav Sci 24:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90:1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet IC (2010) Integrating social and ecological knowledge for planning sustainable land-and sea-scapes: experiences from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Landsc Ecol 25:1201–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I, Smith DM (2007) Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: a social-ecological framework. Landsc Urban Plan 80:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem ­services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu Rev Env Resour 32:67–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Folke C (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Armbrust EV, Arzberger PW, Chapin FS, Elser JJ, Hackett EJ, Ives AR, Kareiva PM, Leibold MA, Lundberg P, Mangel M, Merchant N, Murdoch WW, Palmer MA, Peters DPC, Pickett STA, Smith KK, Wall DH, Zimmerman AS (2009) Accelerate synthesis in ecology and environmental sciences. Bioscience 59:699–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1992) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar M, Epstein D (2007) Planning for ‘megaregions’ in the United States. J Plan Lit 22:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering OC, Kling CL, Nassauer JI, Scavia D (2007) Agricultural policy choices. In: Nassauer JI, Santelmann MV, Scavia D (eds) From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad WE, Fjellstad WJ (2011) Landscapes: bridging the gaps between science, policy and people. Landsc Urban Plan 100:330–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford CM, Gioia DA (2000) Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. J Manage 26:705–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry G (2001) Multifunctional landscapes: towards transdisciplinary research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson LL, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams engagement in creative processes. J Manage 30:453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22:959–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, Vankoppen K, Degroot R, Vanierland E (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill K (2009) Urban design and urban water ecosystems. In: Baker LA (ed) The water environment of cities. Springer Science  +  Business Media/LLC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse DW, Branscomb A, Payne SG (2004) Envisioning alternatives: using citizen guidance to map future land and water use. Ecol Appl 14:325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE, Di Vittorio S (2010) Strategies for megaregion governance. J Am Plann Assoc 77:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JB (1984) Discovering the vernacular landscape. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JL, Sheppard SRJ (2006) Culture and communication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landsc Urban Plan 77:291–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513–1516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle J (1985) Design for human ecosystems. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud M, Liu Y, Hartmann H, Stewart S, Wagener T, Semmens D, Stewart R, Gupta H, Dominguez D, Dominguez F, Hulse D, Letcher R, Rashleigh B, Smith C, Street R, Ticehurst J, Twery M, van Delden H, Waldick R, White D, Winter L (2009) A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environ Modell Softw 24:798–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine C, Seabrook L, Rhodes J, Maron M, Smith C, Bowen M, Butler S, Powell O, Ryan J, Fyfe C, Adams-Hosking C, Smith A, Robertson O, Howes A, Cattarino L (2010) Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning? Landsc Ecol 25:1155–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinig DW (1979) The beholding eye: ten versions of the same scene. In: Meinig DW (ed) The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: geographical essays. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinke H, Nelson R, Kokic P, Stone R, Selvaraju R, Baethgen W (2006) Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis. Clim Res 33:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1992) The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landsc Ecol 6:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1997) Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In: Nassauer JI (ed) Placing nature: culture in landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1999) Culture as a means of experimentation and action. In: Weins JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues in landscape ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 19:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Santelmann MV, Scavia D (eds) (2007) From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobsen R, Klingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez ML, Michelli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman OJ, Townsend A, Turner M (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DPC (2010) Accessible ecology: synthesis of the long, deep, and broad. Trends Ecol Evol 25:592–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc Urban Plan 69:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PlaNYC (2008) Sustainable stormwater management plan. City of New York, Office of the Mayor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Potschin MB, Klug H, Haines-Young RH (2010) From vision to action: framing the Leitbild ­concept in the context of landscape planning. Futures 42:656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santelmann M, Freemark K, White D, Nassauer J, Clark M, Danielson B, Eilers J, Cruse R, Galatowitsch S, Polasky S, Vache K, Wu J (2001) Applying ecological principles to land-use decision-making in agricultural watersheds. In: Dale VH, Haeuber RA (eds) Applying ecological principles to land management. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavia D, Nassauer JI (2007) Introduction: policy insights from integrated assessments and alternative futures. In: Nassauer JI, Santelmann MV, Scavia D (eds) From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom IJ (1995) Overview and state of the art of scenario studies for the rural environment. Environ Policy 5:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer AW, Mouat DA, Bassett SD, Binford MW, Johnson CW, Saarinen JA (2006) Examining development-related uncertainties for environmental management: strategic planning scenarios in Southern California. Landsc Urban Plan 77:359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SRJ (2005) Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: a framework for planning with local communities at the landscape level in Canada. Can J Forest Res 35:1515–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirn A (1998) The language of landscape. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci Technol Hum Val 35:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C, Arias H, Bassett S, Flaxman M, Goode T, Maddock T, Mouat D, Peiser R, Shearer A (2003) Alternative futures for changing landscapes: the Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick C (2009) Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 26:S62–S75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen J, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib M (1995) Must landscapes mean? Approaches to significance in recent landscape architecture. Landscape J 14:46–62

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Partnership for sustainable communities: a year of progress for American communities, Report No. EPA 231-K-10-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Sustainable Communities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):art No. 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP II (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723

    Google Scholar 

  • White DD, Wutich A, Larson KL, Gober P, Lant T, Senneville C (2010) Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers’ assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Sci Public Policy 37:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Troy A, Grove M (2008) Modeling residential lawn fertilization practices: integrating high resolution remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Environ Manage 41:742–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work on this essay was supported by funds from the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, a Center funded by NSF (Grant #DBI-1052875) and the University of Maryland. A revised version was published in Landscape and Urban Planning 106: 3. I thank Joshua Newell, Paul Gobster and Wei-Ning Xiang for their thoughtful review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Iverson Nassauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nassauer, J.I. (2013). Landscape as Method and Medium for the Ecological Design of Cities. In: Pickett, S., Cadenasso, M., McGrath, B. (eds) Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design. Future City, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics