Advertisement

Participatory Soil and Land Evaluation Mapping: An Alternative Approach to Improve Soil and Land Evaluation Information for Decision Makers

  • Ivan Luiz Z. Bacic
  • Juniele R. Pivetta
  • Roberta P. Martins
Chapter

Abstract

Results of soil and land evaluation survey and mapping, which were expected to be essential to rural land use and management planning, most of the time are not adequately used by their potential users and rarely reach the decision makers. This may reflect the poor communication between the main actors of the rural land use planning process and inappropriate language of the presented results. When following traditional methods, there is a risk that questions may be answered that have no relevance and/or those questions may not be answered properly according to the community expectation. Therefore, it is important to change the strategies of communication and language of the results to make information more useful to the decision makers. In this context, the objective of this work was to test a participatory soil survey and land evaluation methodology to make the information more useful and consequently more used by the decision makers. This work shows the results obtained up to now in Barra Bonita municipality, Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. The study started with meetings, interviews and questionnaires with local community, and the main demands for information raised were the need for area expansion and management improvement of pastures for milk production. But, instead of giving them information showing soil types with technical language and a general information about land evaluation, the presented information shows what they want to know, namely, spatial location of potential new areas for pasture, what pasture type is better for different conditions and what management is recommended for each area. In the final stage of the study, participants positively evaluated the presented information.

Keywords

Alternative approach Decision makers Soil mapping Rural land use Land evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CNPq, MDA/SAF, MDS/SESAN and Epagri.

References

  1. Bacic ILZ (2003) Demand-driven land evaluation: with case studies in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Wageningen University/ITC, Wageningen/EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacic ILZ, Rossiter DG, Bregt AK (2003) The use of land evaluation information by land use planners and decision-makers: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Soil Use Manag 19:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouma J (1999) Land evaluation for landscape units. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp E393–E412Google Scholar
  4. EMBRAPA-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2006) Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, 2nd edn. Rio de Janeiro, p 306Google Scholar
  5. IBGE (2000) Censo Demográfico do Brasil 2000 – Características da População e dos Domicílios: Resultados do universo. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE. Available at: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2000/universo.php?tipo=31o/tabela13_1.shtm&paginaatual=1&uf=42&letra=B. Verified on Mar 2010
  6. IBGE (2006) Censo Agropecuário 2006. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro. Available at: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/pesquisas/ca/default.asp?o=2&i=P. Verified on Mar 2010
  7. Rossiter DG (1996) A theoretical framework for land evaluation (with discussion). Geoderma 72:165–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Santa Catarina (1986) Atlas de Santa Catarina. Aerofoto Cruzeiro, Rio de Janeiro, p 173Google Scholar
  9. Santa Catarina (2005) Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura e Desenvolvimento Rural. LAC – Levantamento agropecuário de Santa Catarina: 2002–2003. Florianópolis: Instituto Cepa-SC, Available at: http://cepa.epagri.sc.gov.br/Publicacoes/lac_fev_2005.pdf. Verified on Mar 2010
  10. Silva LC, Bortoluzzi CA (1987) Mapa geológico do Estado de Santa Catarina escala 1:500000: texto explicativo. DNPM – 11o Distrito/Secr. Ciência Tecnologia, Minas e Energia - Coordenadoria de Recursos Minerais, FlorianópolisGoogle Scholar
  11. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn, Agriculture handbook 436. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye J (1991) Land evaluation, part 1: principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. General Administration for Development Cooperation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. Uberti AAA, Bacic ILZ, Panichi JAV, Laus Neto JA, Moser JM, Pundek M, Carriao SL (1991) Metodologia para classificação da aptidão de uso das terras do Estado de Santa Catarina. EMPASC/ACARESC, FlorianópolisGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Diepen CA, Van Keulen H, Wolf J, Berkhout JAA (1991) Land evaluation: from intuition to quantification. In: Stewart BA (ed) Advances in soil science. Springer, New York, pp 139–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Luiz Z. Bacic
    • 1
  • Juniele R. Pivetta
    • 2
  • Roberta P. Martins
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Informações de Recursos Ambientais e de Hidrometeorologia de Santa Catarina (CIRAM), Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (EPAGRI)FlorianópolisBrazil
  2. 2.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Centro de Informações de Recursos Ambientais e de Hidrometeorologia de Santa Catarina (CIRAM), Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (EPAGRI)FlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations