Advertisement

What Can Landscape Ecology Contribute to Forest Landscape Restoration?

  • Thomas R. Crow
Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 15)

Abstract

The art and science of restoration is now commonly viewed as integral to managing natural resources (e.g., Hobbs and Harris 2001; Stanturf and Madsen 2004; Falk et al. 2006; Bosworth and Brown 2007). This view is due in large part to an increased awareness that the cumulative impacts of human activities are profoundly affecting the biosphere – the ultimate ecosystem on which we all depend for our life sustaining goods and services. Effective restoration, however, requires confronting some rather perplexing questions. What is to be restored and to what end? How much restoration will be required in order to obtain the desired outcomes? Where and when on the landscape should restoration occur in order to maximize the benefits? And what defines success? These questions require considering subjects ranging from environmental ethics to cultural values in addition to the technical knowledge and professional judgment that tend to dominate the practice of restoration (Light and Higgs 1996; Light 2000; Vining et al. 2000; Davis and Slobodkin 2004).

Keywords

Landscape Ecology Landscape Structure Restoration Activity Forest Restoration Vegetative Filter Strip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson J, Le Floc’h E (1996) Vital landscape attributes: missing tools for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell SS, Fonseca MS, Motten LB (1997) Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restor Ecol 5:318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondrup-Nielsen S (1995) Forestry and the boreal forest: maintaining inherent landscape patterns. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosworth D, Brown H (2007) Investing in the future: ecological restoration and the USDA Forest Service. J For 105:208–211Google Scholar
  6. Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, Hart SC, Kolb TE, Mast JN, Sackett SS, Wagner MR (1997) Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. J For 95:23–29Google Scholar
  7. Crow TR (2008) A framework for restoration in the national forests. In: Deal RL (Technical editor) Integrated restoration of forested ecosystems to achieve multiresource benefits. In: Proceedings of the 2007 National Silviculture Workshop. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-733. Portland, OR, pp 13–21Google Scholar
  8. Crow TR, Gustafson EJ (1997) Ecosystem management: managing natural resources in time and space. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. The science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 215–228Google Scholar
  9. Crow TR, Host GE, Mladenoff DJ (1999) Ownership and ecosystem as sources of spatial heterogeneity in a forested landscape, Wisconsin, USA. Landsc Ecol 14:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MA, Slobodkin LB (2004) The science and values of restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 12:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk D, Palmer M, Zedler JB (eds) (2006) Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller MM, Gross LJ, Duke-Sylvester SM, Palmer M (2008) Testing the robustness of management decisions to uncertainty: Everglades restoration scenarios. Ecol Appl 18:711–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GAO (2007) Climate change. Agencies should develop guidance for addressing the effects on federal land and water resources. GAO-07-863. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, 184 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustafson EJ, Crow TR (1996) Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. J Environ Manage 46:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustafson EJ, Gardner RH (1996) The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgs ES (1997) What is good ecological restoration? Conserv Biol 11:338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA (2001) Restoration ecology: repairing the earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor Ecol 9:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson EA, Miyanishi K, Weir JMH (1995) Old-growth, disturbance, and ecosystem management. Can J Bot 73:918–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lackey RT (2001) Values, policy, and ecosystem health. BioScience 51:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lackey RT (2004) Societal values and the proper role of restoration ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 2:45–46Google Scholar
  23. Lämås T, Fries C (1995) Emergence of a biodiversity concept in Swedish forest policy. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Light A (2000) Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: a pragmatic perspective. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB (eds) Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 49–70Google Scholar
  25. Light A, Higgs ES (1996) The politics of ecological restoration. Environ Eth 18:227–247Google Scholar
  26. Lynch HJ, Hodge S, Albert C, Dunham M (2008) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: challenges for regional ecosystem management. Environ Manag 41:820–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force (2001) Action plan for reducing, mitigating, and controlling hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Naveh Z (1994) From biodiversity to ecodiversity: a landscape-ecology approach to conservation and restoration. Restor Ecol 2:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, Boyce MS (2000) A historical perspective and future outlook on landscape scale restoration in the northwest Wisconsin pine barrens. Restor Ecol 8:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reitbergen-McCracken J, Maginnis S, Sarre A (eds) (2007) The forest landscape restoration handbook. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schulte LA, Asbjornsen H, Liebman M, Crow TR (2006) Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. J Soil Water Conserv 61:165A–169AGoogle Scholar
  35. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ, Crow TR, Merrick LC, Cleland DT (2007) Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use. Landsc Ecol 22:1089–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) International Science & Policy Working Group (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Available at http://www.ser.org. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, AZ
  37. Stanturf JA, Madsen P (eds) (2004) Restoration of boreal and temperate forests. CRC Press/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 569 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner MG, Wear DN, Flamm RO (1996) Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecol Appl 6:1150–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vining J, Tyler E, Kweon B-S (2000) Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB (eds) Restoring nature, perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 143–161Google Scholar
  40. Walker BCS, Holling SR Carpenter, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc 9(2):5. [Online] URL: http://www.ecology and society.org/vol2/iss2/art5

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rocky Mountain Research StationUS Forest ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations